Robinson Cole LLP
High Contrast Mode

Benjamin M. Daniels advises financial institutions and global corporations about litigation and dispute resolution. As a member of our Business Litigation group, Ben provides creative and ardent advocacy during litigation, enforcement actions, investigations, crisis management, and white-collar defense matters.

Financial Services Disputes

Ben’s clients have come to expect practical and strong representation. He counsels several financial institutions, including investment banks, private-equity firms, portfolio companies, broker-dealers, SPACs, and fintech companies. He represents these institutions before all levels of federal court and state court, as well as before federal agencies such as the SEC and FINRA.

Recently, Ben represented an international fintech corporation in several federal lawsuits; represented a creditor in a fintech bankruptcy; counseled SPACs and SPAC founders on securities litigation and shareholder disputes; and represented a global investment bank in government enforcement actions and concurrent securities litigation.

International Business Disputes

Ben’s clients often face complex, cross-border disputes. He has deep experience with the interplay between domestic and international courts, including discovery disputes and Hague convention proceedings. He also represents clients in international arbitrations and mediations.

Recent highlights include representing U.S. aerospace companies in international arbitration; representing an industry-leading video game developer in international discovery; representing creditors in a multi-billion-dollar bankruptcy in international discovery; representing a former head-of-state in U.S. litigation; and representing a foreign sovereign in the U.S. Supreme Court.

IP, Technology, + Manufacturing

Ben has counseled several technology and manufacturing companies in matters ranging from contract disputes to intellectual property litigation. Among other things, he successfully represented three clients before the Federal Circuit; handled a complex-international patent litigation in the aerospace industry; and represented an international electronics manufacturer in patent litigation at both the trial and appellate levels.

Past Experience + Clerkships

Before joining Robinson and Cole, Ben worked for another major Connecticut-based firm, focusing on complex litigation and appellate law. Prior to that experience, he was an associate at a global law firm in New York City, focusing on complex litigation and government enforcement actions.

Ben is the former co-head of the Appellate Litigation Project at Yale Law School, where his students represented indigent clients in the Second and Third Circuits.

Ben has clerked for two federal judges. He first clerked for Chief Judge Irma E. Gonzalez in the Southern District of California. He then clerked for Judge John M. Rogers of the Sixth Circuit.

  • Washington University in St. Louis School of Law (Juris Doctor, summa cum laude)
    • Order of the Coif
    • Law Review
    • Moot Court
  • Mercy College (Masters, with distinction)
    • Master of Education
  • University of Michigan (Bachelors, with high honors)
    • B.A., History and Anthropology

  • State of Connecticut
  • State of New York
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

Selected as a Rising Star to the Connecticut Super Lawyers list from 2015 to 2019

Recognized as a New Leader in the Law by the Connecticut Law Tribune, 2017

Named to the Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence (CCADV) First 100 Plus Class of 2023 for demonstrating leadership and commitment to improving the lives of domestic violence survivors throughout Connecticut

American Bar Association

Connecticut Bar Association

National Association of College and University Attorneys

Federal Practice

New York City Bar Association
Committee on Securities Litigation

American Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists

Junior Achievement of Greater Fairfield County

Member, ​​​​​​​Board of Directors

Ben has clerked for two federal judges. He first clerked for Chief Judge Irma E. Gonzalez in the Southern District of California. He then clerked for Judge John M. Rogers of the Sixth Circuit.

Experience


Aerospace + Manufacturing Litigation: Domestic Patent-Infringement Dispute

Defended international aerospace company in a domestic patent-infringement dispute with a subsidiary of a major German airline. The airline demanded billions in alleged licensing fees, but we convinced the trial court to invalidate the German airline’s U.S. patent and the Federal Circuit to affirm. *

*Attorney Daniels was counsel in this representative transaction prior to joining Robinson+Cole.

Read More

Aerospace + Manufacturing Litigation: Multi-National Aspects of Patent-Infringement Dispute

Defended international aerospace company in multi-national aspects of a patent-infringement dispute with a German airline. We assisted the client in resisting discovery in the United States, and advised them on strategy in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. We protected our client’s interests, helped them navigate thorny international issues, and obtained positive results in European courts. *

*Attorney Daniels was counsel in this representative transaction prior to joining Robinson+Cole.

Read More

Aerospace + Manufacturing Litigation: Arbitration Against World’s Largest Airliner Manufacturer

Represented an aerospace company in international arbitration against world’s largest airliner manufacturer, which resolved a dispute over a patent sublicense. *

*Attorney Daniels was counsel in this representative transaction prior to joining Robinson+Cole.

Read More


Publications


August 16, 2024

'SEC v. Jarkesy’: Constitutional Protections From Federal Agency Enforcement

New York Law Journal

In the article, Ben and Ileana discuss the recent Supreme Court decision affirming a constitutional right to a jury whenever the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) seeks a civil fine to punish securities fraud. The Court’s decision struck down the SEC’s preferred method of levying fines – administrative hearings – and increased protections for the subjects of SEC investigations. The authors note that this won’t have an immediate effect on the SEC. “Even before the decision in Jarkesy, the [SEC] Division of Enforcement had anticipated an adverse ruling and began bringing most civil enforcement actions to federal court…However, given the costs of federal civil litigation, the Jarkesy decision could portend a change in SEC civil enforcement priorities…” and could create an “opportunity for more favorable settlements for SEC targets.” Read the article. 

Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider teaser
May 24, 2024

Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider

May 10, 2024

SEC’s Crackdown on AI Washing Has Broad Implications

New York Law Journal

The article discusses the SEC’s aggressive stance on “AI washing” with its first enforcement actions of 2024, the history of companies exaggerating technological claims, and the implications of the SEC’s stance moving forward. Read the article.

August 16, 2024

'SEC v. Jarkesy’: Constitutional Protections From Federal Agency Enforcement

New York Law Journal

In the article, Ben and Ileana discuss the recent Supreme Court decision affirming a constitutional right to a jury whenever the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) seeks a civil fine to punish securities fraud. The Court’s decision struck down the SEC’s preferred method of levying fines – administrative hearings – and increased protections for the subjects of SEC investigations. The authors note that this won’t have an immediate effect on the SEC. “Even before the decision in Jarkesy, the [SEC] Division of Enforcement had anticipated an adverse ruling and began bringing most civil enforcement actions to federal court…However, given the costs of federal civil litigation, the Jarkesy decision could portend a change in SEC civil enforcement priorities…” and could create an “opportunity for more favorable settlements for SEC targets.” Read the article. 

Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider teaser
May 24, 2024

Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider

May 10, 2024

SEC’s Crackdown on AI Washing Has Broad Implications

New York Law Journal

The article discusses the SEC’s aggressive stance on “AI washing” with its first enforcement actions of 2024, the history of companies exaggerating technological claims, and the implications of the SEC’s stance moving forward. Read the article.

January 5, 2024

New York District Courts Split on Whether Cryptocurrency Is a Security

New York Law Journal

The article focuses on two cases, SEC vs. Ripple and SEC vs. Terraform, which reached opposite conclusions about whether cryptocurrency is a currency or security. While both cases focused on each platform’s marketing and investor reports, the court’s used different standards to evaluate whether the cryptocurrency in question was an investment contract or simply a currency transaction. “Companies should closely evaluate all statements made to investors about cryptocurrencies,” the authors urge, and “focus on whether they are portraying crypto assets as investments through the nature of transactions, statements to investors, or any other representations.” To read the article, click here.

Legal Update: DOJ Announces Extension of Voluntary Self-Disclosure Guidance for Misconduct Discovered Through M&A Due Diligence teaser
October 6, 2023

Legal Update: DOJ Announces Extension of Voluntary Self-Disclosure Guidance for Misconduct Discovered Through M&A Due Diligence

September 4, 2023

International Discovery Tool Kit Aims to Facilitate Discovery in Both Domestic and Foreign Litigation

Journal on Emerging Issues in Litigation

Business knows no borders. Every year companies increase their global reach and open new offices both domestically and abroad. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this process—remote employees spread documents and witnesses from Chicago to Shanghai to Sumatra. This has made litigation—especially discovery—more complex. Navigating this environment requires a tool kit of resources to secure discovery in support of both domestic and foreign litigation. This article discusses those tools and several traps for the unwary practitioner facing cross-border discovery to anticipate to effectively use those tools to their benefit. View the article.

May 15, 2023

Delaware Courts Rejecting SPAC Defenses

New York Law Journal

As litigation involving special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) continues to gain momentum in Delaware, the authors analyze the recent decision in Delman v. Gig Acquisitions3 that could foretell a limiting of available defenses in future cases. In short, the Delaware Court of Chancery rejected each of the defendants’ arguments, which included derivative claims, holder claims, contract claims, ratification/’Corwin’ cleansing, and exculpation. To avoid future litigation claims, the authors suggest that SPACS should consider giving conservative forecasts of company performance in the proxy materials, and using lead negotiators who are disinterested and who do not stand to realize significant gains from the transaction, among their preventative measures. View the article.

Legal Update: DOJ Announces Significant Corporate Compliance Initiatives teaser
March 8, 2023

Legal Update: DOJ Announces Significant Corporate Compliance Initiatives

March 7, 2023

New Enforcement Tools in Regulating Cryptocurrency

New York Law Journal

Ben and Trevor examine the Department of Justice’s newly formed National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team’s first public action that targeted the Hong-Kong-based exchange, Bitzlato, Ltd., which allegedly served as a haven for money laundering and cybercrime. The action is noteworthy for numerous reasons: because Bitzlato does not accept users in the U.S. and the investigation was coordinated through numerous agencies from several foreign countries. The Bitzlato enforcement action signals a change in the U.S. government’s approach to monitoring cryptocurrency and fighting money laundering activities, both within and outside the U.S. Ben and Trevor suggest that traditional financial institutions should also be cautious if dealing in cryptocurrency. Those institutions should consider refraining from trading on exchanges that permit anonymous or near anonymous trading as it could inadvertently entangle them in funding criminal enterprises. View the article.



January 5, 2024

New York District Courts Split on Whether Cryptocurrency Is a Security

New York Law Journal

The article focuses on two cases, SEC vs. Ripple and SEC vs. Terraform, which reached opposite conclusions about whether cryptocurrency is a currency or security. While both cases focused on each platform’s marketing and investor reports, the court’s used different standards to evaluate whether the cryptocurrency in question was an investment contract or simply a currency transaction. “Companies should closely evaluate all statements made to investors about cryptocurrencies,” the authors urge, and “focus on whether they are portraying crypto assets as investments through the nature of transactions, statements to investors, or any other representations.” To read the article, click here.

Legal Update: DOJ Announces Extension of Voluntary Self-Disclosure Guidance for Misconduct Discovered Through M&A Due Diligence teaser
October 6, 2023

Legal Update: DOJ Announces Extension of Voluntary Self-Disclosure Guidance for Misconduct Discovered Through M&A Due Diligence

September 4, 2023

International Discovery Tool Kit Aims to Facilitate Discovery in Both Domestic and Foreign Litigation

Journal on Emerging Issues in Litigation

Business knows no borders. Every year companies increase their global reach and open new offices both domestically and abroad. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this process—remote employees spread documents and witnesses from Chicago to Shanghai to Sumatra. This has made litigation—especially discovery—more complex. Navigating this environment requires a tool kit of resources to secure discovery in support of both domestic and foreign litigation. This article discusses those tools and several traps for the unwary practitioner facing cross-border discovery to anticipate to effectively use those tools to their benefit. View the article.

May 15, 2023

Delaware Courts Rejecting SPAC Defenses

New York Law Journal

As litigation involving special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) continues to gain momentum in Delaware, the authors analyze the recent decision in Delman v. Gig Acquisitions3 that could foretell a limiting of available defenses in future cases. In short, the Delaware Court of Chancery rejected each of the defendants’ arguments, which included derivative claims, holder claims, contract claims, ratification/’Corwin’ cleansing, and exculpation. To avoid future litigation claims, the authors suggest that SPACS should consider giving conservative forecasts of company performance in the proxy materials, and using lead negotiators who are disinterested and who do not stand to realize significant gains from the transaction, among their preventative measures. View the article.

Legal Update: DOJ Announces Significant Corporate Compliance Initiatives teaser
March 8, 2023

Legal Update: DOJ Announces Significant Corporate Compliance Initiatives

March 7, 2023

New Enforcement Tools in Regulating Cryptocurrency

New York Law Journal

Ben and Trevor examine the Department of Justice’s newly formed National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team’s first public action that targeted the Hong-Kong-based exchange, Bitzlato, Ltd., which allegedly served as a haven for money laundering and cybercrime. The action is noteworthy for numerous reasons: because Bitzlato does not accept users in the U.S. and the investigation was coordinated through numerous agencies from several foreign countries. The Bitzlato enforcement action signals a change in the U.S. government’s approach to monitoring cryptocurrency and fighting money laundering activities, both within and outside the U.S. Ben and Trevor suggest that traditional financial institutions should also be cautious if dealing in cryptocurrency. Those institutions should consider refraining from trading on exchanges that permit anonymous or near anonymous trading as it could inadvertently entangle them in funding criminal enterprises. View the article.


News


December 18, 2025

Robinson+Cole and Rhonda Tobin Receive “Business Excellence” Award at 2025 Equal Opportunity Gala

Robinson+Cole and firm Managing Partner Rhonda Tobin were honored at the 2025 Urban League of Greater Hartford’s (ULGH) 61st Annual Equal Opportunity Day Gala as the 2025 Business Excellence awardee on December 11, 2025. The recognition highlights Rhonda and the firm’s exceptional business impact and commitment to equality and opportunity in the Greater Hartford region. Through the Pro Bono Partnership, which has long served as a bridge between ULGH and Robinson+Cole, a growing team of lawyers has ULGH helped advance critical priorities, including Bruce Barth, Catherine Cuggino, Robert Foxworth, Matthew Guanci, Samuel Maduabueke, and Eden Yerby. The gala celebrated those who help support and fund the ULGH’s programs and services to fight against discrimination and help Hartford area residents overcome barriers to achieve their life goals. Robinson + Cole was proud to be a sponsor of the event.

Urban League of Greater Hartford
Robinson+Cole and Rhonda Tobin Receive “Business Excellence” Award at 2025 Equal Opportunity Gala teaser
June 23, 2025

Capital Markets + Securities Group Represents Dr Ashleys Limited in Merger with Impact BioMedical Inc

GlobeNewswire
August 20, 2024

Ben Daniels and Ileana Polanco Cavazos Author Article Discussing Constitutional Protections From Federal Administrative Agencies

New York Law Journal
December 18, 2025

Robinson+Cole and Rhonda Tobin Receive “Business Excellence” Award at 2025 Equal Opportunity Gala

Robinson+Cole and firm Managing Partner Rhonda Tobin were honored at the 2025 Urban League of Greater Hartford’s (ULGH) 61st Annual Equal Opportunity Day Gala as the 2025 Business Excellence awardee on December 11, 2025. The recognition highlights Rhonda and the firm’s exceptional business impact and commitment to equality and opportunity in the Greater Hartford region. Through the Pro Bono Partnership, which has long served as a bridge between ULGH and Robinson+Cole, a growing team of lawyers has ULGH helped advance critical priorities, including Bruce Barth, Catherine Cuggino, Robert Foxworth, Matthew Guanci, Samuel Maduabueke, and Eden Yerby. The gala celebrated those who help support and fund the ULGH’s programs and services to fight against discrimination and help Hartford area residents overcome barriers to achieve their life goals. Robinson + Cole was proud to be a sponsor of the event.

Urban League of Greater Hartford
Robinson+Cole and Rhonda Tobin Receive “Business Excellence” Award at 2025 Equal Opportunity Gala teaser
June 23, 2025

Capital Markets + Securities Group Represents Dr Ashleys Limited in Merger with Impact BioMedical Inc

GlobeNewswire
August 20, 2024

Ben Daniels and Ileana Polanco Cavazos Author Article Discussing Constitutional Protections From Federal Administrative Agencies

New York Law Journal
May 28, 2024

Ben Daniels, Jen Driscoll, and Sabrina Galli Author New York Law Journal Article Discussing the SEC’s Crackdown on AI Washing

New York Law Journal
January 9, 2024

Ben Daniels, Jenna Scoville, and Ileana Polanco Cavazos Author Article on Whether Cryptocurrency Is a Security

New York Law Journal
July 31, 2023

Ben Daniels Discusses International Discovery on Emerging Litigation Podcast

Emerging Litigation Podcast
May 17, 2023

Ben Daniels, Arila Zhou and Sabrina Galli Discuss the Limiting of SPAC Defenses in New York Law Journal

New York Law Journal
May 12, 2023

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Named to CCADV’s First 100 Plus Class of 2023

March 8, 2023

Ben Daniels and Trevor Bradley Author New York Law Journal Article on New Developments in Regulating Cryptocurrency

New York Law Journal

May 28, 2024

Ben Daniels, Jen Driscoll, and Sabrina Galli Author New York Law Journal Article Discussing the SEC’s Crackdown on AI Washing

New York Law Journal
January 9, 2024

Ben Daniels, Jenna Scoville, and Ileana Polanco Cavazos Author Article on Whether Cryptocurrency Is a Security

New York Law Journal
July 31, 2023

Ben Daniels Discusses International Discovery on Emerging Litigation Podcast

Emerging Litigation Podcast
May 17, 2023

Ben Daniels, Arila Zhou and Sabrina Galli Discuss the Limiting of SPAC Defenses in New York Law Journal

New York Law Journal
May 12, 2023

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Named to CCADV’s First 100 Plus Class of 2023

March 8, 2023

Ben Daniels and Trevor Bradley Author New York Law Journal Article on New Developments in Regulating Cryptocurrency

New York Law Journal

Events


Past

Clearing the Hurdles in International Discovery with Ben Daniels

Jul 26 2023
An Emerging Litigation podcast
Past

Clearing the Hurdles in International Discovery with Ben Daniels

Jul 26 2023
An Emerging Litigation podcast