Robinson Cole LLP
High Contrast Mode
Marquee

Real Estate Litigation

The Real Estate Litigation Group consists of lawyers with the essential background and skills to advance their clients’ objectives in the area of real estate litigation. Our representation spans these disciplines:

  • General real estate litigation
  • Land use and zoning
  • Mortgage litigation
  • Real property tax appeals
  • Condominiums/common interest communities

Our Services + Our Team

The members of the group are seasoned litigators who are knowledgeable in all aspects of real property law, "speak the language" of real estate, and understand the fundamental elements of real property law and transactions. The group also works closely with and leverages the resources of other Robinson+Cole practices to create multidisciplinary teams to advocate for our real estate clients and to resolve their disputes. The Real Estate Litigation Group represents clients before state and federal courts, both trial and appellate, as well as in administrative hearings, arbitration, and mediation.

General Real Estate Litigation

We provide litigation services and counseling to developers, lenders, owners, lessors, and lessees on a wide range of real estate disputes that includes these areas:

  • Leases and takings
  • Mortgages, liens, and foreclosures
  • Title, ownership, and development
  • Beach and waterfront rights

Land Use+ Zoning

Our lawyers regularly represent both institutional and individual clients in both federal and state actions, including litigation matters and administrative appeals, that involve the following:

  • Permit
  • Variances
  • Subdivisions
  • Covenants
  • Restrictions
  • Affordable housing
  • Wetlands

Mortgage Litigation

We provide litigation services and counseling to lenders in a wide range of disputes, including the following:

  • Validity, priority, and foreclosure of mortgages
  • Defense of consumer protection and fair debt claims
  • Predatory lending
  • Class action claims

Real Property Tax Appeals

Our lawyers regularly represent commercial owners in all stages of the appeal process, including negotiation with municipal authorities, appearances before the board of assessment appeals, and appeals to the state court. We  have years of  experience with these kinds of matters:

  • Special use
  • Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
  • Income-producing properties
  • Contingency fee tax audits
  • The impact of environmental conditions on the valuation of real property

Condominium/Common Interest

We represent condominium organizations in almost every matter likely to affect a common interest community, including the following:

  • The assessment and collection of common area fees
  • Contract and construction disputes
  • Due diligence requirements of the first independent board after turnover
  • Problems of governance (including challenges by dissident unit owners and internal boards of trustees disputes)
  • Claims against developers and contractors
  • Disputes with insurers
  • Negotiations with management companies
  • Controversies with municipalities and neighboring condominiums

Our representation ranges from negotiation to mediation to arbitration and, when appropriate, to the litigation that may ensue when some element of the condominium process goes wrong and judicial intervention is necessary. No matter the forum, we speak the language of condominium boards, unit owners, lenders, and management.

Experience


Environmental Claims

Represented national public utility company in defense of environmental claims based on historic property usage.

Dismissal of Claims Against Developer

Obtained expedited and complete dismissal of claims against a developer for easements over commercial property in Boston’s Seaport District, which enabled the development and sale of a hotel on the site.

Numerous Zoning Appeals

Litigated numerous zoning appeals in state and federal courts, including representation of leading telecommunication companies in prosecuting and defending zoning appeals.



Publications


February 14, 2024

‘Yellowstone’ Injunctions: Navigating the Wild West of Commercial Lease Disputes

New York Law Journal

The Yellowstone injunction is implicated in nearly every lease for commercial real property in the state of New York, yet most landlords and tenants do not know what it is or how it affects them. Below is a succinct overview of its implications so that commercial landlords and tenants can better navigate lease disputes. Stopping the Clock on a Cure Period Yellowstone injunctions take their name not from the popular neo-Western drama series but from the New York Court of Appeals case of First National Stores v. Yellowstone Shopping Center that created this limited-purpose injunction. In that case, the landlord and tenant disagreed about who was responsible for installing a sprinkler system, which the court ultimately decided was the tenant’s responsibility. Although the tenant was able and willing to make the installation once the court said so, the tenant had not asked to pause the cure period, and the landlord had terminated the lease for default. New York’s highest court decided it was not empowered to extend the tenant’s deadline to cure its default and upheld the lease termination. This case conceptualized and gave rise to the remedy referred to a Yellowstone injunction. Its purpose is to stop the running of the applicable cure period: it prevents a commercial landlord from prematurely terminating a lease for default until a court decides whether the alleged default is proper or not. Only a commercial tenant can ask for such an injunction, and it must demonstrate that: (1) it has received a notice of default, notice to cure, or a threat of termination; (2) it has made its request to the court for an injunction prior to the termination of the lease; and (3) it is willing and able to cure the alleged default. Since these three factors are relatively easy to prove, such injunctions are commonly granted. Although Yellowstone injunctions are a tenant’s remedy, they are not always one-sided and can provide protections for a landlord. New York courts have imposed conditions on injunctions meant to protect the landlord during the period of the stay. For example, in disputes concerning defaults unrelated to the payment of rent, courts have conditioned the injunction on the continued payment of rent or the posting of a bond. In disputes concerning the payment of rent, courts have required the tenant to deposit rent arrears in a jointly held escrow account and deposit monthly sums equal to rent in the account for the duration of the injunction. Practical Implications From a tenant’s perspective, time is often of the essence. Because most cure periods can be quite short (7 to 10 calendar days is typical), a tenant must act quickly if it receives a notice of default or notice of cure. This should involve having an attorney review the notice and the lease, assess whether an injunction remedy is available, and, if so, make an emergency application in court to stop the clock on the cure period. Acting quickly not only preserves the tenant’s right to cure its default down the road if the court decides against the tenant, but it also provides the tenant some leverage by engaging the landlord in urgent litigation. From a landlord’s perspective, these practical implications have led many landlords to require a tenant to waive its right to seek such an injunction. These waivers often go beyond Yellowstone injunctions to waive a tenant’s right to bring a lawsuit for a “declaratory judgment”—meaning a lawsuit brought in the Supreme Court of New York seeking an interpretation of the lease and giving the parties access to full discovery. As a result of such a waiver, tenants are typically limited to bringing their claims in an expedited, streamlined proceeding in the landlord-tenant part of the local court, which does not typically allow for discovery (and is, thus, less costly for the landlord). However, a wave of new laws arose in 2019 with respect to declaratory judgment waivers, making it prudent for landlords to take stock of their commercial leases well before a dispute arises. In 2019, the Court of Appeals upheld the enforceability of a lease provision waiving a commercial tenant’s right to bring an action for a declaratory judgment. In the case decided by the court, the Yellowstone injunction requested by the tenant as part of the action was also denied as waived. Almost immediately, in response to the Court of Appeals decision, the New York State Legislature passed a law prohibiting such declaratory judgment waivers effective Dec. 20, 2019. Section 235-h of the New York Real Property prohibits and nullifies any provision in a commercial lease “waiving or prohibiting the right of any tenant to bring a declaratory judgment action with respect to any provision, term or condition” of its commercial lease. Section 235-h raises more questions than it answers. First, Section 235-h has been interpreted to only apply to leases signed after Dec. 20, 2019. Therefore, waivers of declaratory judgment actions contained in older leases can still be enforceable. Second, the prohibition’s scope is unclear and has not yet been tested in court.  Section 235-h prohibits waiving the remedy of a “declaratory judgment action,” but a Yellowstone injunction can still be available to tenants in other types of actions as well. This creates opportunities and risks for both tenants and landlords. From a tenant’s perspective, a tenant whose lease only waives “declaratory judgment” actions can try to frame its lawsuit as one for breach of contract (i.e., a breach of the lease) and seek a Yellowstone injunction in that context. Although this type of action may not be ideal for the tenant, it is a potential workaround of the waiver that creates the same urgency and leverage that can promote an out-of-court resolution. From a landlord’s perspective, a landlord may still try to require a more limited waiver of only a Yellowstone injunction (not declaratory judgments broadly) because Section 235-h does not call out Yellowstone injunctions specifically. Tenants, in turn, may try to resist or negotiate such a waiver depending on their relative bargaining power. Negotiations could include lengthening the cure period in exchange for a waiver or requiring the parties to participate in a mediation before the lease can be terminated. Yellowstone injunctions and related waivers are frequently litigated, making it essential to stay updated on changes in the law. Janet Kljyan is a member of Robinson+Cole’s business litigation group and Charles F. Martin III is a partner in the firm’s real estate and development group. Reprinted with permission from the February 14, 2024 edition of the New York Law Journal© 2023 ALM Global Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited, contact 877-256-2472 or asset-and-logo-licensing@alm.com

Legal Update: Massachusetts Extends Moratorium on Certain Evictions and Foreclosures (COVID-19 Coronavirus) teaser
July 27, 2020

Legal Update: Massachusetts Extends Moratorium on Certain Evictions and Foreclosures (COVID-19 Coronavirus)

Legal Update: Massachusetts Enacts H. 4647 – Establishing Broad Eviction and Foreclosure Moratorium During COVID-19 State of Emergency (COVID-19 Coronavirus) teaser
April 21, 2020

Legal Update: Massachusetts Enacts H. 4647 – Establishing Broad Eviction and Foreclosure Moratorium During COVID-19 State of Emergency (COVID-19 Coronavirus)

February 14, 2024

‘Yellowstone’ Injunctions: Navigating the Wild West of Commercial Lease Disputes

New York Law Journal

The Yellowstone injunction is implicated in nearly every lease for commercial real property in the state of New York, yet most landlords and tenants do not know what it is or how it affects them. Below is a succinct overview of its implications so that commercial landlords and tenants can better navigate lease disputes. Stopping the Clock on a Cure Period Yellowstone injunctions take their name not from the popular neo-Western drama series but from the New York Court of Appeals case of First National Stores v. Yellowstone Shopping Center that created this limited-purpose injunction. In that case, the landlord and tenant disagreed about who was responsible for installing a sprinkler system, which the court ultimately decided was the tenant’s responsibility. Although the tenant was able and willing to make the installation once the court said so, the tenant had not asked to pause the cure period, and the landlord had terminated the lease for default. New York’s highest court decided it was not empowered to extend the tenant’s deadline to cure its default and upheld the lease termination. This case conceptualized and gave rise to the remedy referred to a Yellowstone injunction. Its purpose is to stop the running of the applicable cure period: it prevents a commercial landlord from prematurely terminating a lease for default until a court decides whether the alleged default is proper or not. Only a commercial tenant can ask for such an injunction, and it must demonstrate that: (1) it has received a notice of default, notice to cure, or a threat of termination; (2) it has made its request to the court for an injunction prior to the termination of the lease; and (3) it is willing and able to cure the alleged default. Since these three factors are relatively easy to prove, such injunctions are commonly granted. Although Yellowstone injunctions are a tenant’s remedy, they are not always one-sided and can provide protections for a landlord. New York courts have imposed conditions on injunctions meant to protect the landlord during the period of the stay. For example, in disputes concerning defaults unrelated to the payment of rent, courts have conditioned the injunction on the continued payment of rent or the posting of a bond. In disputes concerning the payment of rent, courts have required the tenant to deposit rent arrears in a jointly held escrow account and deposit monthly sums equal to rent in the account for the duration of the injunction. Practical Implications From a tenant’s perspective, time is often of the essence. Because most cure periods can be quite short (7 to 10 calendar days is typical), a tenant must act quickly if it receives a notice of default or notice of cure. This should involve having an attorney review the notice and the lease, assess whether an injunction remedy is available, and, if so, make an emergency application in court to stop the clock on the cure period. Acting quickly not only preserves the tenant’s right to cure its default down the road if the court decides against the tenant, but it also provides the tenant some leverage by engaging the landlord in urgent litigation. From a landlord’s perspective, these practical implications have led many landlords to require a tenant to waive its right to seek such an injunction. These waivers often go beyond Yellowstone injunctions to waive a tenant’s right to bring a lawsuit for a “declaratory judgment”—meaning a lawsuit brought in the Supreme Court of New York seeking an interpretation of the lease and giving the parties access to full discovery. As a result of such a waiver, tenants are typically limited to bringing their claims in an expedited, streamlined proceeding in the landlord-tenant part of the local court, which does not typically allow for discovery (and is, thus, less costly for the landlord). However, a wave of new laws arose in 2019 with respect to declaratory judgment waivers, making it prudent for landlords to take stock of their commercial leases well before a dispute arises. In 2019, the Court of Appeals upheld the enforceability of a lease provision waiving a commercial tenant’s right to bring an action for a declaratory judgment. In the case decided by the court, the Yellowstone injunction requested by the tenant as part of the action was also denied as waived. Almost immediately, in response to the Court of Appeals decision, the New York State Legislature passed a law prohibiting such declaratory judgment waivers effective Dec. 20, 2019. Section 235-h of the New York Real Property prohibits and nullifies any provision in a commercial lease “waiving or prohibiting the right of any tenant to bring a declaratory judgment action with respect to any provision, term or condition” of its commercial lease. Section 235-h raises more questions than it answers. First, Section 235-h has been interpreted to only apply to leases signed after Dec. 20, 2019. Therefore, waivers of declaratory judgment actions contained in older leases can still be enforceable. Second, the prohibition’s scope is unclear and has not yet been tested in court.  Section 235-h prohibits waiving the remedy of a “declaratory judgment action,” but a Yellowstone injunction can still be available to tenants in other types of actions as well. This creates opportunities and risks for both tenants and landlords. From a tenant’s perspective, a tenant whose lease only waives “declaratory judgment” actions can try to frame its lawsuit as one for breach of contract (i.e., a breach of the lease) and seek a Yellowstone injunction in that context. Although this type of action may not be ideal for the tenant, it is a potential workaround of the waiver that creates the same urgency and leverage that can promote an out-of-court resolution. From a landlord’s perspective, a landlord may still try to require a more limited waiver of only a Yellowstone injunction (not declaratory judgments broadly) because Section 235-h does not call out Yellowstone injunctions specifically. Tenants, in turn, may try to resist or negotiate such a waiver depending on their relative bargaining power. Negotiations could include lengthening the cure period in exchange for a waiver or requiring the parties to participate in a mediation before the lease can be terminated. Yellowstone injunctions and related waivers are frequently litigated, making it essential to stay updated on changes in the law. Janet Kljyan is a member of Robinson+Cole’s business litigation group and Charles F. Martin III is a partner in the firm’s real estate and development group. Reprinted with permission from the February 14, 2024 edition of the New York Law Journal© 2023 ALM Global Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited, contact 877-256-2472 or asset-and-logo-licensing@alm.com

Legal Update: Massachusetts Extends Moratorium on Certain Evictions and Foreclosures (COVID-19 Coronavirus) teaser
July 27, 2020

Legal Update: Massachusetts Extends Moratorium on Certain Evictions and Foreclosures (COVID-19 Coronavirus)

Legal Update: Massachusetts Enacts H. 4647 – Establishing Broad Eviction and Foreclosure Moratorium During COVID-19 State of Emergency (COVID-19 Coronavirus) teaser
April 21, 2020

Legal Update: Massachusetts Enacts H. 4647 – Establishing Broad Eviction and Foreclosure Moratorium During COVID-19 State of Emergency (COVID-19 Coronavirus)

Legal Update: COVID-19: Rhode Island’s Governor Raimondo Issues Executive Order Closing All “Non-Essential” Retail Until April 13, 2020 (COVID-19 Coronavirus) teaser
March 30, 2020

Legal Update: COVID-19: Rhode Island’s Governor Raimondo Issues Executive Order Closing All “Non-Essential” Retail Until April 13, 2020 (COVID-19 Coronavirus)



Legal Update: COVID-19: Rhode Island’s Governor Raimondo Issues Executive Order Closing All “Non-Essential” Retail Until April 13, 2020 (COVID-19 Coronavirus) teaser
March 30, 2020

Legal Update: COVID-19: Rhode Island’s Governor Raimondo Issues Executive Order Closing All “Non-Essential” Retail Until April 13, 2020 (COVID-19 Coronavirus)

News


January 5, 2026

Robinson+Cole Promotes New Partners and Counsel in Strategic Practices and Markets

Robinson+Cole announced the election of Zhuoyao (Joy) Hui, Kathryn N. Mullin, and Austin G. Provost as Partners, effective January 1, 2026. These promotions reinforce the firm’s growth strategy and deepen its Capital Markets + Securities and Real Estate practices, with expanded capacity in major commercial centers, including New York and Boston. The firm continues to invest in high‑demand work, adding depth in areas critical to clients—public and private offerings, securities compliance for U.S. and Asia cross‑border transactions, and complex real estate acquisitions, financing, and development. In addition, the firm promoted Jonathan L. Cabot, William M. Daley, Emily C. Deans, Kiernan L. Ignacio, Tasnuva (Taz) Islam, Judy Lu, Rita E. Nerney, and Abigail L. Preissler to Counsel, also effective January 1. The new Counsel represent a range of practice areas, including business transactions, finance, litigation, environmental, insurance, and managed care and ERISA litigation. “These outstanding attorneys truly embody Robinson+Cole’s core values and ongoing commitment to legal excellence,” said Rhonda J. Tobin, Managing Partner at Robinson+Cole. “Their leadership, legal acumen, and unwavering dedication and collaboration have already made a significant impact on our clients’ success and, in turn, the success of our firm. We are proud to recognize these future leaders of our firm and are delighted to congratulate them on their well-deserved promotions. I am excited to see the impact that they will continue to have on our clients, the firm and our communities.” New Partners Hui is an experienced corporate and securities lawyer with an emphasis in equity and debt capital markets. She represents issuers, underwriters, and sponsors in a wide range of equity and debt offerings. Based in the firm’s New York office and a member of Robinson+Cole’s Capital Markets + Securities Group, her practice focuses on equity offerings, including initial public offerings, SPAC and de-SPAC transactions, follow-on offerings, and private placements, as well as debt offerings, including high-yield and investment-grade bonds, convertible bonds, liability management transactions, and leveraged acquisition financing. Mullin represents lenders in multifamily housing transactions including bridge, construction and permanent financing transactions, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac transactions, and tax-exempt financing transactions. Based in the firm’s Hartford office and a member of Robinson+Cole’s Real Estate + Development group, she has extensive experience in transactions with state and federal tax credits, HAP contracts, ground leases, and a wide variety of subordinate debt. In addition, she also has experience in all aspects of affordable housing securitization programs with multiple issuers and Freddie Mac. Provost is a strategic problem-solver and real estate advisor who has extensive experience representing landlords and tenants in complex leasing transactions across retail, industrial, and office sectors nationwide; counseling clients on the acquisition and disposition of commercial real estate assets; and assisting both borrowers and lenders in commercial real estate lending transactions. Based in the firm’s Stamford office and a member of Robinson+Cole’s Real Estate + Development group, he brings a practical, solutions-driven approach to every transaction—anticipating challenges, streamlining processes, fostering collaboration, and driving deals forward with precision and efficiency. New Counsel Boston Business Transactions Counsel Cabot represents clients operating across industries, including technology, software, health tech and health services, fashion, gaming and entertainment, and manufacturing, in mergers and acquisitions and general corporate matters. He represents public and private companies, private equity sponsors, and principal owners and investors through all stages of the M&A process. Providence Insurance + Reinsurance Counsel Daley advises clients nationally and internationally in complex insurance coverage litigation and commercial disputes, including property, liability, and other types of insurance matters, class action defense, breach of contract claims, business torts, data privacy and cybersecurity litigation, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. Stamford Environmental, Energy + Telecommunications Counsel Deans advises clients with environmental compliance counseling, permitting, site remediation, and real estate and corporate transactions and represents clients such as telecommunications companies, municipalities, water and wastewater utilities, and manufacturers in proceedings before state regulatory agencies in facility siting and project permitting matters. New York Business Transactions Counsel Ignacio advises clients in mergers and acquisitions across a range of industries, including healthcare, technology, manufacturing, and energy. She also handles a variety of general corporate and commercial matters. Boston Business Litigation Counsel Islam advises clients facing a wide range of disputes, primarily focusing on real estate litigation and complex commercial litigation. New York Insurance + Reinsurance Counsel Lu’s practice focuses on large-loss property subrogation in pursuit of recoveries on behalf of property insurers for losses arising out of fires, explosions, floods, product failures, and equipment failures. Boston Managed Care + ERISA Litigation Counsel Nerney represents health insurers and other managed care organizations, third-party administrators, and self-insured plans in a wide array of matters, including ERISA, insurance fraud, and network agreement disputes. She also has extensive experience representing clients in complex commercial litigation, including employment matters, energy-related matters, and internal and government investigations. Hartford Finance and Business Transactions Counsel Preissler represents banks, borrowers, funds, small business investment companies (SBICs), and other lenders in all aspects of transactional law with a primary focus on commercial finance transactions, including secured and unsecured, mezzanine, and other senior and subordinated lending transactions.

Firm names three partners and eight counsel in New York, Boston, Hartford, Providence, and Stamford
December 30, 2025

Kendra Berardi Once Again Recognized as a Massachusetts “Go To Lawyer” in Commercial Real Estate

Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
November 14, 2025

Robinson+Cole Secures Top Rankings in 2026 Edition of Best Law Firms®

Firm earns 6 national and 46 first-tier rankings in Boston, Hartford, New York, Rhode Island, and Stamford Markets
Robinson+Cole Secures Top Rankings in 2026 Edition of Best Law Firms® teaser
January 5, 2026

Robinson+Cole Promotes New Partners and Counsel in Strategic Practices and Markets

Robinson+Cole announced the election of Zhuoyao (Joy) Hui, Kathryn N. Mullin, and Austin G. Provost as Partners, effective January 1, 2026. These promotions reinforce the firm’s growth strategy and deepen its Capital Markets + Securities and Real Estate practices, with expanded capacity in major commercial centers, including New York and Boston. The firm continues to invest in high‑demand work, adding depth in areas critical to clients—public and private offerings, securities compliance for U.S. and Asia cross‑border transactions, and complex real estate acquisitions, financing, and development. In addition, the firm promoted Jonathan L. Cabot, William M. Daley, Emily C. Deans, Kiernan L. Ignacio, Tasnuva (Taz) Islam, Judy Lu, Rita E. Nerney, and Abigail L. Preissler to Counsel, also effective January 1. The new Counsel represent a range of practice areas, including business transactions, finance, litigation, environmental, insurance, and managed care and ERISA litigation. “These outstanding attorneys truly embody Robinson+Cole’s core values and ongoing commitment to legal excellence,” said Rhonda J. Tobin, Managing Partner at Robinson+Cole. “Their leadership, legal acumen, and unwavering dedication and collaboration have already made a significant impact on our clients’ success and, in turn, the success of our firm. We are proud to recognize these future leaders of our firm and are delighted to congratulate them on their well-deserved promotions. I am excited to see the impact that they will continue to have on our clients, the firm and our communities.” New Partners Hui is an experienced corporate and securities lawyer with an emphasis in equity and debt capital markets. She represents issuers, underwriters, and sponsors in a wide range of equity and debt offerings. Based in the firm’s New York office and a member of Robinson+Cole’s Capital Markets + Securities Group, her practice focuses on equity offerings, including initial public offerings, SPAC and de-SPAC transactions, follow-on offerings, and private placements, as well as debt offerings, including high-yield and investment-grade bonds, convertible bonds, liability management transactions, and leveraged acquisition financing. Mullin represents lenders in multifamily housing transactions including bridge, construction and permanent financing transactions, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac transactions, and tax-exempt financing transactions. Based in the firm’s Hartford office and a member of Robinson+Cole’s Real Estate + Development group, she has extensive experience in transactions with state and federal tax credits, HAP contracts, ground leases, and a wide variety of subordinate debt. In addition, she also has experience in all aspects of affordable housing securitization programs with multiple issuers and Freddie Mac. Provost is a strategic problem-solver and real estate advisor who has extensive experience representing landlords and tenants in complex leasing transactions across retail, industrial, and office sectors nationwide; counseling clients on the acquisition and disposition of commercial real estate assets; and assisting both borrowers and lenders in commercial real estate lending transactions. Based in the firm’s Stamford office and a member of Robinson+Cole’s Real Estate + Development group, he brings a practical, solutions-driven approach to every transaction—anticipating challenges, streamlining processes, fostering collaboration, and driving deals forward with precision and efficiency. New Counsel Boston Business Transactions Counsel Cabot represents clients operating across industries, including technology, software, health tech and health services, fashion, gaming and entertainment, and manufacturing, in mergers and acquisitions and general corporate matters. He represents public and private companies, private equity sponsors, and principal owners and investors through all stages of the M&A process. Providence Insurance + Reinsurance Counsel Daley advises clients nationally and internationally in complex insurance coverage litigation and commercial disputes, including property, liability, and other types of insurance matters, class action defense, breach of contract claims, business torts, data privacy and cybersecurity litigation, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. Stamford Environmental, Energy + Telecommunications Counsel Deans advises clients with environmental compliance counseling, permitting, site remediation, and real estate and corporate transactions and represents clients such as telecommunications companies, municipalities, water and wastewater utilities, and manufacturers in proceedings before state regulatory agencies in facility siting and project permitting matters. New York Business Transactions Counsel Ignacio advises clients in mergers and acquisitions across a range of industries, including healthcare, technology, manufacturing, and energy. She also handles a variety of general corporate and commercial matters. Boston Business Litigation Counsel Islam advises clients facing a wide range of disputes, primarily focusing on real estate litigation and complex commercial litigation. New York Insurance + Reinsurance Counsel Lu’s practice focuses on large-loss property subrogation in pursuit of recoveries on behalf of property insurers for losses arising out of fires, explosions, floods, product failures, and equipment failures. Boston Managed Care + ERISA Litigation Counsel Nerney represents health insurers and other managed care organizations, third-party administrators, and self-insured plans in a wide array of matters, including ERISA, insurance fraud, and network agreement disputes. She also has extensive experience representing clients in complex commercial litigation, including employment matters, energy-related matters, and internal and government investigations. Hartford Finance and Business Transactions Counsel Preissler represents banks, borrowers, funds, small business investment companies (SBICs), and other lenders in all aspects of transactional law with a primary focus on commercial finance transactions, including secured and unsecured, mezzanine, and other senior and subordinated lending transactions.

Firm names three partners and eight counsel in New York, Boston, Hartford, Providence, and Stamford
December 30, 2025

Kendra Berardi Once Again Recognized as a Massachusetts “Go To Lawyer” in Commercial Real Estate

Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
November 14, 2025

Robinson+Cole Secures Top Rankings in 2026 Edition of Best Law Firms®

Firm earns 6 national and 46 first-tier rankings in Boston, Hartford, New York, Rhode Island, and Stamford Markets
Robinson+Cole Secures Top Rankings in 2026 Edition of Best Law Firms® teaser
January 13, 2025

Robinson+Cole Elects New Partners and Counsel for 2025

November 13, 2024

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Named to Pro Bono Honor Rolls

August 15, 2024

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2025

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in <i>The Best Lawyers in America</i>© 2025 teaser
February 21, 2024

Janet Kljyan and Charles Martin Author New York Law Journal Article on Yellowstone Injunctions and Commercial Lease Disputes

New York Law Journal
November 6, 2023

Robinson+Cole Receives 42 First-Tier Metropolitan Rankings and Six National Rankings in Latest Edition of Best Law Firms®

Best Law Firms
Robinson+Cole Receives 42 First-Tier Metropolitan Rankings and Six National Rankings in Latest Edition of Best Law Firms® teaser
December 13, 2021

Boston Magazine Names Seven R+C Lawyers as a Top Lawyer 2021

Boston Magazine

January 13, 2025

Robinson+Cole Elects New Partners and Counsel for 2025

November 13, 2024

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Named to Pro Bono Honor Rolls

August 15, 2024

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2025

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in <i>The Best Lawyers in America</i>© 2025 teaser
February 21, 2024

Janet Kljyan and Charles Martin Author New York Law Journal Article on Yellowstone Injunctions and Commercial Lease Disputes

New York Law Journal
November 6, 2023

Robinson+Cole Receives 42 First-Tier Metropolitan Rankings and Six National Rankings in Latest Edition of Best Law Firms®

Best Law Firms
Robinson+Cole Receives 42 First-Tier Metropolitan Rankings and Six National Rankings in Latest Edition of Best Law Firms® teaser
December 13, 2021

Boston Magazine Names Seven R+C Lawyers as a Top Lawyer 2021

Boston Magazine