Robinson Cole LLP
High Contrast Mode

John P. Casey concentrates his practice on land use and environmental matters, with particular emphasis on coastal management, development, permitting, and littoral and riparian water rights. He is a member of Robinson+Cole’s Land Use and Real Estate + Development groups, and the partner in charge of our firm’s New London office.

Land Use – Zoning

John handles planning, zoning, and wetland permits and applications. He helps his clients secure the necessary local, state, and federal approvals for their projects, whether it is an industrial complex, pier, seawall, mooring field, new medical facility, private dock, shoreline bridge, or waterfront home. John regularly appears before local zoning, wetlands, and harbor management commissions, as well as the Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection (DEEP) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He has represented a variety of clients, such as manufacturers, government and quasi-government agencies, hospitals, homeowners, condominium associations, retailers, waterfront property owners, and marinas, helping them make their projects a reality.

John has successfully represented applicants in contested administrative hearings before DEEP hearing officers for coastal development projects, including major defense manufacturing facilities and regional port facilities. He has also obtained all the necessary approvals for a regional community hospital in Connecticut to build a new 40,000-square-foot cancer treatment facility, secured a permit from DEEP for an onsite community sewerage system for a client who needed it to develop a residential adult community, successfully represented a client in a controversial proposal to rebuild a pedestrian bridge between two islands off the Connecticut shore, and helped property owners save their coastal homes after they were damaged in major storms.

Litigation

John handles litigation related to land use and property rights, including appeals of zoning and permit decisions and DEEP final administrative actions. He has achieved positive results for clients who have had to pursue litigation over land use matters. He secured money damages and injunctive relief for a client who owns lakefront property, after a neighbor illegally maintained a mooring in his client’s littoral rights area. On behalf of a large grocer, John successfully defended an environmental intervenor’s appeals of land use boards’ approvals, allowing the construction of a new grocery store. John has also successfully defended permits issued by the DEEP in court appeals brought by project opponents.

Previously, John was a member of Robinson+Cole's Trial and Appellate section. He has extensive experience in all types of civil litigation, including products liability, personal injury, and insurance coverage and subrogation matters.

Admiralty

As an extension of his coastal management practice, John also advises clients on admiralty and maritime matters, such as damage claims concerning vessels and land-based structures. He is one of the primary attorneys in our firm representing the Connecticut Port Authority, a quasi-public agency that is responsible for marketing and coordinating the development of the state’s ports and maritime economy.

Pro Bono

John has an active and diverse pro bono practice. He has represented disabled veterans in eviction actions as well as represented a non-profit entity in its efforts to allow the public to visit one of the oldest lighthouses in the nation. He is a former member of Connecticut Legal Services Inc.’s Board of Directors, where he worked on a collaborative pro bono project that provided legal assistance to low-income elderly adults faced with abusive debt collection practices and other consumer law issues.

Before joining our firm, John was a lieutenant in the U.S. Navy, Judge Advocate General's Corps, fulfilling various legal duties while stationed at the Naval Submarine Base in Groton, Connecticut. After completing his military service, he worked for a litigation firm in New London, Connecticut.

  • Washington College of Law, American University (Juris Doctor, summa cum laude)
    • Law Review
  • University of Connecticut (Bachelors)
    • B.A., Economics

  • State of Connecticut
  • State of Rhode Island
  • U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. Navy (JAG) United States Court of Military Appeals

Presented with the 2023 Jeanne Czel Person of the Year Award by the Connecticut Marine Trades Association

Connecticut Veterans Legal Center
Pro Bono Council

Environmental Business Council of New England (EBC)
Chair, Ocean and Coastal Resources Committee

Planning Team, 5th Annual Connecticut Offshore Wind Conference

Connecticut Bar Association (2000 - Current)

Connecticut Bar Foundation
James W. Cooper Fellow (2012)

Rhode Island Bar Association (2001 - Current)

Connecticut Marine Trades Association
Environment Committee (2005 - Current)

Connecticut Harbor Management Association

Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Project on Climate Change

Naval & Maritime Consortium
Thames River Working Group, Offshore Wind Working Group

Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut
Energy Council

Ocean Community YMCA (Naik Branch)
Board of Managers, and Property Committee

Connecticut Legal Services, Inc.
Treasurer and Member, Board of Directors and Executive Committee

The Mystic & Noank Library
Member, Board of Trustees

Connecticut Cruise Ship Task Force
President, Board of Directors

New London Education Foundation
Board Member

Groton Mystic Lacrosse Association
President, Board of Directors
Coach and Member, Board of Directors

Groton Housing Authority
Board Member

Experience


New Dock Opposed by Neighbor + Commission

Represented coastal property owners in connection with a proposal to build a new dock that was opposed by a neighbor and the local harbor management commission. Our services included a contested administrative hearing before the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP), an appeal to the Connecticut Superior Court, which was dismissed on the grounds that the neighbor abandoned her environmental claims and the claims regarding the power of the harbor management commission over DEEP decisions conflicted with state statutes, an appeal to the Connecticut Appellate Court, which affirmed the decision of the Superior Court and expanded on the limited powers of a local harbor management commission to make recommendations regarding state coastal permit applications, and, finally the successful opposition to petitions to have the Connecticut Supreme Court undertake further review of the Appellate Court decision.

Read More

New Waterfront Facilities Permits

Represented defense manufacturer to successfully obtain federal, state, and local permits to build new waterfront facilities that include large scale assembly space, berthing locations, and dredging.

Dock Extension Application + Approval

Represented coastal property owner in application to build extension of existing dock into waters of harbor so that there was a greater depth at which to berth his boat at low tide. Approvals were required from the Connecticut DEEP, as well as the Army Corps of Engineers, who had authority over the federal navigation project in the harbor. The approval from DEEP also required the recording of a shared dock agreement for the property and the neighboring property owned by the same owner.

Read More


Publications


June 25, 2024

How Justices’ Chevron Ruling May Influence Wind Projects

Law360

The article covers recent challenges to offshore wind projects, and how an anticipated ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court may upend long-standing principles of deference to federal agency decision making. “The court’s decision could influence the agencies’ rulemaking process, how agencies interpret their statutory authority, and the deference that courts apply to those interpretations,” they write. “While the statutes and regulations governing the approval process for offshore wind projects will remain constant, at least for the time being, the federal courts’ framework for reviewing agencies’ decision making based on those rules could be subject to upheaval.” Read the article.

Legal Update: First Circuit Rejects Challenges to Federal Permits for Vineyard Wind 1 teaser
May 21, 2024

Legal Update: First Circuit Rejects Challenges to Federal Permits for Vineyard Wind 1

Legal Update: New Federal Speed Regulations for Coastal Waters teaser
September 28, 2022

Legal Update: New Federal Speed Regulations for Coastal Waters

June 25, 2024

How Justices’ Chevron Ruling May Influence Wind Projects

Law360

The article covers recent challenges to offshore wind projects, and how an anticipated ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court may upend long-standing principles of deference to federal agency decision making. “The court’s decision could influence the agencies’ rulemaking process, how agencies interpret their statutory authority, and the deference that courts apply to those interpretations,” they write. “While the statutes and regulations governing the approval process for offshore wind projects will remain constant, at least for the time being, the federal courts’ framework for reviewing agencies’ decision making based on those rules could be subject to upheaval.” Read the article.

Legal Update: First Circuit Rejects Challenges to Federal Permits for Vineyard Wind 1 teaser
May 21, 2024

Legal Update: First Circuit Rejects Challenges to Federal Permits for Vineyard Wind 1

Legal Update: New Federal Speed Regulations for Coastal Waters teaser
September 28, 2022

Legal Update: New Federal Speed Regulations for Coastal Waters

Legal Update: Long Island Sound Blue Plan teaser
May 28, 2021

Legal Update: Long Island Sound Blue Plan

May 18, 2012

The View from the Shore - Regulation as Far as the Eye Can See

New England Real Estate Journal


Legal Update: Long Island Sound Blue Plan teaser
May 28, 2021

Legal Update: Long Island Sound Blue Plan

May 18, 2012

The View from the Shore - Regulation as Far as the Eye Can See

New England Real Estate Journal

News


April 2, 2026

John Casey Appointed to the Connecticut Veterans Legal Center’s Pro Bono Council

Real Estate + Development group partner John Casey was appointed to serve on the Connecticut Veterans Legal Center’s (CVLC) Pro Bono Council. The Council coordinates the organization’s Pro Bono Attorney Network, connecting Connecticut veterans facing urgent legal needs with free legal services. Through this work, the Council empowers and supports veterans as they overcome legal barriers to housing, healthcare, income stability, and recovery.

June 26, 2024

Peter Knight, John Casey, and Eden Yerby Co-Author Law360 Article on How SCOTUS Rulings May Impact Wind Projects

Law360
July 14, 2023

John Casey Selected to EBC Ocean and Coastal Resources Committee Leadership Team

April 2, 2026

John Casey Appointed to the Connecticut Veterans Legal Center’s Pro Bono Council

Real Estate + Development group partner John Casey was appointed to serve on the Connecticut Veterans Legal Center’s (CVLC) Pro Bono Council. The Council coordinates the organization’s Pro Bono Attorney Network, connecting Connecticut veterans facing urgent legal needs with free legal services. Through this work, the Council empowers and supports veterans as they overcome legal barriers to housing, healthcare, income stability, and recovery.

June 26, 2024

Peter Knight, John Casey, and Eden Yerby Co-Author Law360 Article on How SCOTUS Rulings May Impact Wind Projects

Law360
July 14, 2023

John Casey Selected to EBC Ocean and Coastal Resources Committee Leadership Team

April 4, 2023

John Casey Receives Person of the Year Award at CT Marine Trades Association 2023 Industry Day Conference & Annual Meeting

March 18, 2019

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Help Reopen New London Harbor Lighthouse

December 11, 2014

Robinson+Cole’s New London Office Moves Across Town

December 4, 2014

Robinson+Cole Elects New Partners and Counsel

June 18, 2014

Robinson+Cole Takes Part in Chamber Golf Tournament

Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut
October 17, 2012

Robinson & Cole Sponsors U.S. Senate Debate

The Garde Arts Center

April 4, 2023

John Casey Receives Person of the Year Award at CT Marine Trades Association 2023 Industry Day Conference & Annual Meeting

March 18, 2019

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Help Reopen New London Harbor Lighthouse

December 11, 2014

Robinson+Cole’s New London Office Moves Across Town

December 4, 2014

Robinson+Cole Elects New Partners and Counsel

June 18, 2014

Robinson+Cole Takes Part in Chamber Golf Tournament

Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut
October 17, 2012

Robinson & Cole Sponsors U.S. Senate Debate

The Garde Arts Center

Events


Past

VALOR Society's Second Annual Pro Bono Night

Apr 9 2026
University of Connecticut School of Law
Past

EBC 6th Annual Ocean and Coastal Resources Regional Agency Update

Mar 3 2026
Virtual via Zoom
Past

VALOR Society's Second Annual Pro Bono Night

Apr 9 2026
University of Connecticut School of Law
Past

EBC 6th Annual Ocean and Coastal Resources Regional Agency Update

Mar 3 2026
Virtual via Zoom
Past

EBC 5th Annual Ocean and Coastal Resources Regional Agency Update

Mar 5 2025
Virtual via Zoom
Past

EBC 5th Annual Connecticut Offshore Wind Conference

Sep 20 2024
Eversource Energy
Past

EBC 4th Annual Ocean and Coastal Resources Regional Agency Update

Feb 8 2024
Environmental Business Council of New England (EBC)
Past

2023 Annual Ocean Community YMCA Golf Tournament

Sep 11 2023
Stonington Country Club
Past

EBC 5th Annual Ocean and Coastal Resources Regional Agency Update

Mar 5 2025
Virtual via Zoom
Past

EBC 5th Annual Connecticut Offshore Wind Conference

Sep 20 2024
Eversource Energy
Past

EBC 4th Annual Ocean and Coastal Resources Regional Agency Update

Feb 8 2024
Environmental Business Council of New England (EBC)
Past

2023 Annual Ocean Community YMCA Golf Tournament

Sep 11 2023
Stonington Country Club

Environmental Law +


Below is an excerpt of Environmental Law + blog posts authored by John.

First Circuit Rejects Challenges to Federal Permits for Vineyard Wind 1 

Below is an excerpt of a legal update co-authored with Real Estate + Development Group lawyer Eden Yerby. In companion rulings favoring offshore wind developers and federal agencies, the First Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed rulings issued by the District Court (D. Mass.) and dismissed challenges brought by two Vineyard Wind opponents concerning the project’s potential impact on the endangered North Atlantic right whale.[1] In both cases, a panel of the same three judges addressed challenges to the administrative procedures followed by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in issuing a biological opinion and an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) for the project that would directly impact the right whale. In two decisions authored by Judge Kayatta analyzing aspects of the federal permit approval process, the Court ruled that the agencies properly evaluated potential impacts to the right whale and did not violate the authorizing statutes or otherwise act arbitrarily or capriciously. Read the full legal update.

Visit Blog

Favorable Winds for Offshore Development – Inflation Reduction Act and Other Updates

The offshore wind industry stands to gain additional momentum this summer as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) moves through Congress to its anticipated passage. The budget reconciliation package associated with the bill continues to reflect a substantial investment in the further development of renewable energy measures, several of which relate to offshore wind and related transmission infrastructure projects. Future offshore wind development prospects are particularly bright for several New England and east coast states, which earlier this summer joined the Biden administration in announcing a new federal-state partnership to grow American-made clean energy. While offshore wind is not the sole beneficiary of these legislative initiatives, the impacts could prove to be transformative for planned and contemplated offshore installations.  Inflation Reduction Act      The IRA contains several incentives for offshore wind development.  These include: An energy investment tax credit (ITC) provides a scaled tax credit of up to 30 percent for offshore wind projects that begin construction before January 1, 2026. A new tax credit of 10 percent for the domestic production of wind components and specialized offshore wind installation vessels.  An expansion of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to include the exclusive economic zone of U.S. territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. This would allow for the development of offshore wind projects in these areas. The Act instructs the Department of the Interior (DOI) to evaluate applicable lease opportunities. An end to the Trump-era moratorium currently prohibiting federal leasing on the outer continental shelf off the coast of the southeastern U.S. A $3 billion grant to install electrified equipment and reduce emissions at U.S. seaports, where infrastructure is a linchpin for supply chain development and management. The IRA does impose certain restrictions on the leasing of offshore wind development.  During the 10-year period following enactment, the DOI’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) would not be allowed to lease wind development unless the agency held an offshore oil and gas lease sale in the previous year that offered certain defined opportunities for fossil fuel development on the outer continental shelf. Federal-State Offshore Wind Partnership On June 23, 2022, the White House announced a new federal-state partnership to grow American-made clean energy and further the Biden administration’s goal of 30 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030. The eleven states taking part are Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New York, Delaware, Maryland, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. The main components of the partnership, which focus on the supply chain, are outlined in a White House press release, and noted below.  Mutual Federal-State Commitments Increase U.S. domestic manufacturing, logistics, and workforce to develop a robust U.S. offshore wind industry. Engage underserved communities, ocean users, tribes, and other stakeholders. Support the development of a domestic fleet of offshore wind installation and service vessels. State Commitments Use opportunities for project solicitations to support domestic commitments in offshore wind procurements.   Explore opportunities to take regional approaches to advance domestic offshore wind manufacturing. Federal Commitments Facilitate timely and effective permitting and environmental reviews for offshore wind projects. Incentivize investment in the U.S. offshore wind supply chain by utilizing the lease auction process. Develop an offshore wind supply chain roadmap to identify critical gaps in offshore wind development. Leverage federal funding opportunities to promote a U.S.-based offshore wind supply chain. A commission consisting of the U.S. Department of Energy and the states of New York and Maryland will also continue to develop a national offshore wind supply chain roadmap. The first step in developing the roadmap was a report, released in March 2022, that demonstrated the substantial need to increase the number of domestic vessels to assist in offshore wind development and construction. Currently, only some ten vessels have the capacity to construct large offshore wind turbines, globally. In an effort to alleviate this vessel shortage in the United States, the Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration has listed wind turbine installation vessels as “Vessels of National Interest.” This categorization will provide the proposed construction of such vessels with priority federal funding through the Federal Ship Financing Program. A second report further detailing the roadmap is expected to be published by the end of 2022 and will detail scenarios that would increase U.S. manufacturing of major components for the offshore wind supply chain. In Connecticut, the city of New London continues to shine as a focal point of offshore wind development in New England.  Earlier this summer, the State Pier Project attracted national attention as U.S. Secretary of Energy, Jennifer Granholm, visited New London to inspect the progress of the project. In her remarks, Secretary Granholm noted President Biden’s interest in the project and its suitability to serve as a model for other heavy-lift capable ports that will be necessary to create and maintain offshore facilities.

Visit Blog

U.S. Customs Agency Issues Guidance on Jones Act Compliance in Connection with Offshore Wind Projects

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued a ruling stating that the Jones Act does not apply to several specific offshore wind activities, which permits those activities to be performed by foreign vessels. One of the complicating factors to offshore wind development in the United States is the applicability of the Jones Act, and whether the Jones Act allows related development activities to be performed by foreign vessels.  The Jones Act limits the transportation of “merchandise” between U.S. coastwise points to vessels that are built and registered in the United States and are owned by a U.S. citizen.  CBP had previously determined that the Jones Act applies, generally, to the transportation of merchandise from a U.S. port and other coastwise points to wind turbine generator foundations.  As such, the Jones Act, and its prohibition against the use of more readily available foreign wind turbine installation vessels (WTIVs), has complicated and, in some instances, added substantial cost to the installation of offshore turbines.  A recent CBP ruling provides companies involved in offshore wind projects clearer guidance on the applicability of the Jones Act to certain specific windfarm installation activities.  In its April 2022 ruling, the CBP analyzed the applicability of the Jones Act to several specific offshore wind activities and in several instances determined the Act does not apply, which permits those activities to be performed by foreign vessels.  For example, the CBP confirmed that a foreign WTIV can move crew members and materials to the work site because crew members are not “passengers” and work materials are not “merchandise,” as those terms are defined in the Jones Act.  Similarly, a foreign WTIV may arrive in U.S. waters and install foundations and other project components it has transported from a foreign port.  The ruling also addresses the use of foreign vessels in installing underwater cables, confirming that the Jones Act does not apply to vessels laying electrical cables in U.S. waters between two U.S. points, or to vessels loading that cable at a U.S. port.  Similarly, the use of foreign cable lay vessels (which create, lay and bury cables on the sea floor), is permitted, as that activity is not considered “dredging,” a function historically reserved for Jones Act-compliant vessels.  The ruling also confirms prior CBP guidance with respect to the installation of scour protection, which is used to prevent loss of seabed sediment around the base of an offshore structure.  Foreign vessels are permitted to pick up rocks in a U.S. port, transport them offshore, and place them at a work site – provided the rocks are the first thing being added to the pristine sea floor. In one instance, the CPB’s April ruling reverses an earlier position regarding the installation of cable protection in favor of Jones Act compliance.  Previously, foreign vessels were permitted to load concrete mats and place them on top of laid piping, as the existing pipe was not considered a U.S. point.  Based on an interpretation of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, however, the CBP determined that the laying of an electrical cable on the seabed was intended to be made a U.S. point, as it is a means of transporting resources.  As a result, installation of concrete mats to protect the piping running from the offshore structure requires the use of a Jones Act-compliant vessel. While the applicability of the Jones Act to specific offshore wind development activities will continue to require careful analysis, the CBP’s April ruling provides offshore wind developers some clarity moving forward.

Visit Blog