Robinson Cole LLP
High Contrast Mode

Brian C. Freeman focuses his practice on environmental compliance counseling, permitting, site remediation, and related litigation regarding federal and state regulatory programs. Areas of particular focus include air quality, climate change, petroleum management, and waste management/recycling. Brian has worked with a variety of clients, ranging from Fortune 100 conglomerates to individual entrepreneurs, and across a broad spectrum of industries, including aerospace, specialty chemicals, petroleum, electricity generation, composting and organics management.

Air Quality

Brian has experience across the breadth of federal and state air programs in varied contexts, including permitting, day-to-day and strategic compliance counseling, facility purchase/sale, private-party claims, and civil and criminal enforcement. Specific areas of experience include: major and minor New Source Review pre-construction permitting; Title V operating permits; federal and state hazardous air pollutant programs; federal emission standards for nonroad engines; Risk Management Programs under the Clean Air Act §112(r); Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements for facilities and consumer products; New Source Performance Standards (NSPS); and management of refrigerants and other Ozone-Depleting Substances. His air experience also includes less conventional issues such as odor, noise, and open burning.

As an active member of the State Implementation Plan Revision Advisory Committee (SIPRAC), Brian has worked with the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) to develop, implement, and amend numerous air programs in that state. From 2009 to 2015, and from 2022 to the present, he has served as Co-Chair of the Air Task Force of the Connecticut Business & Industry Association's Energy and Environment Council.  Since 2017, he has also served on the Board of Directors of the Air & Waste Association’s New England Section.

Climate Change

Brian has long worked with clients in navigating the emerging and uncertain world of climate change. His experience includes assessing the impact of state, federal, and international climate change policy and programs, developing related strategy, advocacy, and compliance programs. through pre-existing programs as well as development of new approaches among industry, non-governmental organizations, and regulators.

Environmental Remediation

Brian has extensive experience in representing clients facing Superfund and other liability claims, including complex contaminated sediment sites in urbanized tidal estuaries and rivers. He also has long counseled a client on an extensive RCRA, TSCA and state remediation effort, natural resources restoration and site redevelopment at a large riverfront property following a century of intensive manufacturing use. He has particular experience with releases at petroleum bulk storage facilities and dispensing sites, including emergency response, investigation and remediation efforts, regulatory enforcement actions, and negotiation and lawsuits with adjacent property owners and operators, both commercial and residential.

Waste Management/Recycling

Brian has worked with numerous composting and other organics waste management facilities in achieving permitting, compliance and transaction objectives. He also has served as outside counsel to the U.S. Composting Council (USCC), where he was instrumental in developing the certification programs underlying the “compostable” logo found on many consumer plastic products today, and the “Seal of Testing Assurance” (STA) logo for compost products. In 2021-22, he played a lead role in the USCC’s task force in developing a model zoning ordinance for composting facilities.

Brian is a regular contributor to the firm’s Environmental Law+ blog, and frequently publishes and presents in a variety of venues on environmental law topics.  Since 2010, he has been a guest lecturer regarding the federal Clean Air Act in undergraduate and graduate environmental law and policy courses at Wesleyan University and Tufts University.

Before joining the firm, he clerked for Judge Albert J. Engel, Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

  • University of Virginia School of Law (Juris Doctor)
    • Virginia Law Review
    • Virginia Environmental Law Journal
  • Georgetown University (Bachelors, summa cum laude)
    • B.A., Government

  • State of Connecticut
  • Commonwealth of Virginia
  • U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut

Selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© in the area(s) of Environmental Law since 2006 and Litigation-Environmental since 2011

Connecticut Business & Industry Association
Energy & Environment Council, Steering Committee (2009-2015, 2022 - Present)
Co-Chair, Air Task Force (2009-2015, 2022-Present)
Air Task Force (1990 - Present)

Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection
State Implementation Plan Regulatory Advisory Committee (SIPRAC) (1993 - Present)

Connecticut Bar Association
Environmental Law Section (1990 - Present)

Air and Waste Management Association - New England Section
Board of Directors (2017 - Present)

US Composting Council (1995 - Present)
Model Zoning Ordinance Task Force (2020 - 2021)
Co-chair of Government Committee (1997 - 1999)

Environmental Business Council of New England
Climate Change and Air Committee; Solid Waste Management Committee (2017 - Present)

Experience


Air Quality: Compliance Strategies + Assurance Systems

Regularly assist manufacturing clients in developing and implementing compliance strategies and assurance systems concerning state and federal air quality requirements relative to existing operations, and in assessing, reporting and resolving compliance issues. 

Read More

Air Quality: "Potential to Emit" Analyses

Represent a specialized medical products manufacturer in responding to enforcement action by state agency regarding issues under New Source Review, Title V, and VOC RACT (Reasonable Available Control Technologies for Volatile Organic Compounds). Worked closely with client's in-house and outside experts in developing "potential to emit" analyses reflective of the complex and variable chemistries employed in production, successfully demonstrating to the agency's satisfaction that the operation was not subject to Title V, and preparing and working with the agency in review of an application for a minor New Source Review permit. Through deep-dive research of various VOC RACT standards, successfully demonstrated to the agency that none were applicable to the client's operations.

Read More

Air Quality: US EPA Request for Information

Advised and assisted the owner and operator of two hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities (TSDFs) in responding to a US EPA request for information under the Clean Air Act and the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), follow-up EPA inspections and testing order; defending against a related EPA enforcement action alleging numerous CAA and RCRA violations; and in negotiating resolution of the enforcement action at a substantial discount from the original penalty demand.

Read More


Publications


June 8, 2023

Breaking the Mold – Best Practices by Educational Institutions to Limit Mold Exposure and Loss

American School & University

Mold is one of the oldest life forms on the planet, and it continues to be a hot topic among health experts – as well as those operating and maintaining education facilities. Most types of mold grow in high-moisture areas. Mold plays an important part in our ecosystem and can have various beneficial uses, but prolonged exposure to elevated levels of certain mold types can cause allergic reactions and respiratory problems, which may be severe. Complaints about mold at education institutions may arise from students, employees or visitors. Unlike many contaminants, however, there may be few clear regulatory or health-based limits to define acceptable versus unacceptable levels for mold. Given that, plus the different types of mold and different levels of personal sensitivity, determining the risk from mold exposure can be complicated. Often, the initial response made following a mold complaint is immediate testing; however, the process, scope, and type of testing may raise more issues that must be addressed. To Test or Not Test Before a decision is made to test, several issues should be considered in consultation with technical and legal resources that are experienced in dealing with mold issues. Those issues include: Determining which test method(s) to use, and how best to carry out tests in a specific setting Ensuring that the selected test method(s) are carried out properly Interpreting test results Determining “action levels” (i.e., results that warrant follow-up action), and what such action should be Confirming that the institution is prepared to promptly commit the resources necessary for such action Testing for mold may be more complex than expected. Unlike most contaminants, mold is ubiquitous in nature as well as in built environments. The many different types of mold further complicate the picture. Some molds always produce toxins, other molds produce toxins only in certain environments and some molds do not produce toxins in any environment. Contributing to the problem, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not recommend routine sampling for mold because there are no established standards for determining what constitutes a “normal” level. If a decision is made to proceed with testing for mold, the uncertainties potentially associated with such testing make it necessary to consider how to appropriately manage information and discussions resulting from such testing. Depending on the context, it also may be appropriate to consider whether and to what degree confidentiality or attorney-client privilege protections are warranted. Prevent, Detect and Abate The time and costs required for testing and the potential value of test results should be weighed against the value of prevention, detection and abatement strategies. These strategies include: Periodically checking for possible moisture sources that could create mold issues in interior spaces Conducting visual or odor checks for mold, and using enhanced cleaning regimens in potential problem areas For moisture sources, mold experts assess not only for potential sources of liquid water (e.g., plumbing leaks), but also for water vapor (e.g., hot, humid exterior air entering air-conditioned interiors, leading to condensation). Vapor is a particular challenge on college campuses at the beginning and end of the academic year when students or visitors prop doors open to facilitate move-in or move-out. When an institution identifies a mold problem or becomes aware of a mold complaint, it is important to promptly locate and abate moisture source(s) at the specific location as well as any surrounding areas that may also be affected. The immediate response should take into account how it will affect students or employees who report having allergies or other respiratory problems. Such persons should be relocated immediately until mold removal professionals can clean the affected areas. One prevention method schools should consider is educating students on the instrumental role they play in causing or preventing the growth of mold. Encouraging best practices for student spaces and common areas can help institutions lower the risk of significant mold growth. These best practices include preventing mold growth by: Hanging wet towels or sweaty clothes to dry Using exhaust fans when showering Mopping up spills immediately, whether on floors, on countertops, inside cabinets, or elsewhere Ensuring any rugs or carpets that receive spills or tracked-in rain, snow, or ice do not stay wet Immediately reporting any wet rugs or carpets that cannot be easily dried Immediately reporting any odors Another important prevention method is diligent building maintenance. One of the many dangers of deferred maintenance, particularly in older buildings, is the growth of mold. Delays in tasks like repairing window or roof leaks or insulating piping can lead to mold infestations. Although deferring seemingly minor repairs might save costs in the short term, it can necessitate future mold remediation that may be urgent and far costlier and could expose the institution to bad publicity or legal liability. For example, a 2019 class action lawsuit against Indiana University Bloomington cited widespread mold infestation in university residence halls because of chronically leaking pipes, condensate leaks from heating and cooling systems, roof leaks, and many other unaddressed maintenance deficiencies. The university’s response included installing air filtration systems, but those led to noise complaints and an expansion of the lawsuit. The university was ultimately successful on appeal, but not before compensating 2,458 students a total of $7.7 million and enduring high-profile negative publicity. Before significant mold problems occur, institutions can employ prevention methods such as: Performing regular building and HVAC inspections that include scrutiny of potential mold sources or hot spots Routing vents outdoors for all moisture-generating appliances Avoiding putting carpeting in high-humidity spaces such as basements Assessing and if necessary, controlling humidity levels in all interior spaces Although mold is ubiquitous, serious mold infestations and resulting class-action lawsuits do not have to be. With planning and preventive action, education institutions can limit mold-related exposure and loss.

Legal Update: Ozone Nonattainment “Bump-up” in Connecticut:Is your facility about to get bumped into more stringent air regulations? teaser
October 27, 2022

Legal Update: Ozone Nonattainment “Bump-up” in Connecticut:Is your facility about to get bumped into more stringent air regulations?

Spring 2022

New Release Reporting Regulations in Connecticut: 10 Takeaways for Petroleum Marketers

CEMA Aegis, the magazine of the CT Energy Marketers Association
June 8, 2023

Breaking the Mold – Best Practices by Educational Institutions to Limit Mold Exposure and Loss

American School & University

Mold is one of the oldest life forms on the planet, and it continues to be a hot topic among health experts – as well as those operating and maintaining education facilities. Most types of mold grow in high-moisture areas. Mold plays an important part in our ecosystem and can have various beneficial uses, but prolonged exposure to elevated levels of certain mold types can cause allergic reactions and respiratory problems, which may be severe. Complaints about mold at education institutions may arise from students, employees or visitors. Unlike many contaminants, however, there may be few clear regulatory or health-based limits to define acceptable versus unacceptable levels for mold. Given that, plus the different types of mold and different levels of personal sensitivity, determining the risk from mold exposure can be complicated. Often, the initial response made following a mold complaint is immediate testing; however, the process, scope, and type of testing may raise more issues that must be addressed. To Test or Not Test Before a decision is made to test, several issues should be considered in consultation with technical and legal resources that are experienced in dealing with mold issues. Those issues include: Determining which test method(s) to use, and how best to carry out tests in a specific setting Ensuring that the selected test method(s) are carried out properly Interpreting test results Determining “action levels” (i.e., results that warrant follow-up action), and what such action should be Confirming that the institution is prepared to promptly commit the resources necessary for such action Testing for mold may be more complex than expected. Unlike most contaminants, mold is ubiquitous in nature as well as in built environments. The many different types of mold further complicate the picture. Some molds always produce toxins, other molds produce toxins only in certain environments and some molds do not produce toxins in any environment. Contributing to the problem, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not recommend routine sampling for mold because there are no established standards for determining what constitutes a “normal” level. If a decision is made to proceed with testing for mold, the uncertainties potentially associated with such testing make it necessary to consider how to appropriately manage information and discussions resulting from such testing. Depending on the context, it also may be appropriate to consider whether and to what degree confidentiality or attorney-client privilege protections are warranted. Prevent, Detect and Abate The time and costs required for testing and the potential value of test results should be weighed against the value of prevention, detection and abatement strategies. These strategies include: Periodically checking for possible moisture sources that could create mold issues in interior spaces Conducting visual or odor checks for mold, and using enhanced cleaning regimens in potential problem areas For moisture sources, mold experts assess not only for potential sources of liquid water (e.g., plumbing leaks), but also for water vapor (e.g., hot, humid exterior air entering air-conditioned interiors, leading to condensation). Vapor is a particular challenge on college campuses at the beginning and end of the academic year when students or visitors prop doors open to facilitate move-in or move-out. When an institution identifies a mold problem or becomes aware of a mold complaint, it is important to promptly locate and abate moisture source(s) at the specific location as well as any surrounding areas that may also be affected. The immediate response should take into account how it will affect students or employees who report having allergies or other respiratory problems. Such persons should be relocated immediately until mold removal professionals can clean the affected areas. One prevention method schools should consider is educating students on the instrumental role they play in causing or preventing the growth of mold. Encouraging best practices for student spaces and common areas can help institutions lower the risk of significant mold growth. These best practices include preventing mold growth by: Hanging wet towels or sweaty clothes to dry Using exhaust fans when showering Mopping up spills immediately, whether on floors, on countertops, inside cabinets, or elsewhere Ensuring any rugs or carpets that receive spills or tracked-in rain, snow, or ice do not stay wet Immediately reporting any wet rugs or carpets that cannot be easily dried Immediately reporting any odors Another important prevention method is diligent building maintenance. One of the many dangers of deferred maintenance, particularly in older buildings, is the growth of mold. Delays in tasks like repairing window or roof leaks or insulating piping can lead to mold infestations. Although deferring seemingly minor repairs might save costs in the short term, it can necessitate future mold remediation that may be urgent and far costlier and could expose the institution to bad publicity or legal liability. For example, a 2019 class action lawsuit against Indiana University Bloomington cited widespread mold infestation in university residence halls because of chronically leaking pipes, condensate leaks from heating and cooling systems, roof leaks, and many other unaddressed maintenance deficiencies. The university’s response included installing air filtration systems, but those led to noise complaints and an expansion of the lawsuit. The university was ultimately successful on appeal, but not before compensating 2,458 students a total of $7.7 million and enduring high-profile negative publicity. Before significant mold problems occur, institutions can employ prevention methods such as: Performing regular building and HVAC inspections that include scrutiny of potential mold sources or hot spots Routing vents outdoors for all moisture-generating appliances Avoiding putting carpeting in high-humidity spaces such as basements Assessing and if necessary, controlling humidity levels in all interior spaces Although mold is ubiquitous, serious mold infestations and resulting class-action lawsuits do not have to be. With planning and preventive action, education institutions can limit mold-related exposure and loss.

Legal Update: Ozone Nonattainment “Bump-up” in Connecticut:Is your facility about to get bumped into more stringent air regulations? teaser
October 27, 2022

Legal Update: Ozone Nonattainment “Bump-up” in Connecticut:Is your facility about to get bumped into more stringent air regulations?

Spring 2022

New Release Reporting Regulations in Connecticut: 10 Takeaways for Petroleum Marketers

CEMA Aegis, the magazine of the CT Energy Marketers Association
December 28, 2021

More Than a New Year’s Resolution: Connecticut Organics Recycling Mandate Expands in 2022

Environmental Compliance and Permitting

Published as an Environmental Law blog post.

June 18, 2021

Auto Shredder Regulators Attentive to Emissions and Environmental Justice

Recycling Today

While the intersection of shredder operations, related air emissions and environmental justice (EJ) regulations is not new, Brian, Earl and Jon acknowledge that the issue is “receiving significant new scrutiny from federal, state and local environmental regulators, as well as from neighborhood activists and environmental groups.” The article highlights recent EJ initiatives, covers some of the air permitting and EJ basics and offers some questions to consider regarding emissions and EJ. “Air permitting always has been a complicated and cumbersome process that can bring lengthy permitting battles or significant enforcement actions. With an increased focus on EJ, air permitting for recycling facilities in general, and especially those with shredders, will only become a more important process for which a facility must prepare and handle appropriately from the outset.” View the article.

Legal Update: EPA Tosses Out the “Once In, Always In” Policy For Major Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants teaser
February 1, 2018

Legal Update: EPA Tosses Out the “Once In, Always In” Policy For Major Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants

July 2017

Time to Toss it Out? The ‘Once In, Always In’ Policy for ‘Major Source’ Hazardous Air Pollutant Standards

Environmental Law Reporter

Brian discusses how the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s recent call for regulatory reform suggestions provides an opportunity to end EPA’s policy for defining a major source of hazardous air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. Under the policy, if a facility’s potential to emit hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) ever exceeded “major source” thresholds after the first compliance date of any substantive requirements of an applicable “major source” HAP standard, the facility must comply with regulations for “major sources” permanently, even if the facility later reduces its potential emissions below trigger levels. The article questions the legal and practical soundness of this approach, and discusses how ending the policy would avoid compliance burdens and unwarranted penalties, and incentivize emission reductions. View the article.

October 2016

EPA Turns Up the Heat on Refrigerant Regulation

Robinson & Cole Legal Update

Overview of expanded and tightened EPA regulations for refrigerants and other ozone-depleting substances (ODS)

March 2016

EPA Proposes Significant Expansions of Its Risk Management/Accidental Release Prevention Program

Overview of EPA proposal to revise and expand its regulations under Clean Air Act section 112(r)



December 28, 2021

More Than a New Year’s Resolution: Connecticut Organics Recycling Mandate Expands in 2022

Environmental Compliance and Permitting

Published as an Environmental Law blog post.

June 18, 2021

Auto Shredder Regulators Attentive to Emissions and Environmental Justice

Recycling Today

While the intersection of shredder operations, related air emissions and environmental justice (EJ) regulations is not new, Brian, Earl and Jon acknowledge that the issue is “receiving significant new scrutiny from federal, state and local environmental regulators, as well as from neighborhood activists and environmental groups.” The article highlights recent EJ initiatives, covers some of the air permitting and EJ basics and offers some questions to consider regarding emissions and EJ. “Air permitting always has been a complicated and cumbersome process that can bring lengthy permitting battles or significant enforcement actions. With an increased focus on EJ, air permitting for recycling facilities in general, and especially those with shredders, will only become a more important process for which a facility must prepare and handle appropriately from the outset.” View the article.

Legal Update: EPA Tosses Out the “Once In, Always In” Policy For Major Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants teaser
February 1, 2018

Legal Update: EPA Tosses Out the “Once In, Always In” Policy For Major Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants

July 2017

Time to Toss it Out? The ‘Once In, Always In’ Policy for ‘Major Source’ Hazardous Air Pollutant Standards

Environmental Law Reporter

Brian discusses how the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s recent call for regulatory reform suggestions provides an opportunity to end EPA’s policy for defining a major source of hazardous air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. Under the policy, if a facility’s potential to emit hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) ever exceeded “major source” thresholds after the first compliance date of any substantive requirements of an applicable “major source” HAP standard, the facility must comply with regulations for “major sources” permanently, even if the facility later reduces its potential emissions below trigger levels. The article questions the legal and practical soundness of this approach, and discusses how ending the policy would avoid compliance burdens and unwarranted penalties, and incentivize emission reductions. View the article.

October 2016

EPA Turns Up the Heat on Refrigerant Regulation

Robinson & Cole Legal Update

Overview of expanded and tightened EPA regulations for refrigerants and other ozone-depleting substances (ODS)

March 2016

EPA Proposes Significant Expansions of Its Risk Management/Accidental Release Prevention Program

Overview of EPA proposal to revise and expand its regulations under Clean Air Act section 112(r)


News


August 26, 2025

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2026

The Best Lawyers in America© has named 78 Robinson+Cole lawyers across the firm’s practice groups and offices for inclusion in and recognition in its 2026 edition. The firm had 57 lawyers resident in its Connecticut offices named to the list and continues to have the highest number of recognized lawyers in the state. Robinson+Cole also has the highest number of listed lawyers in Connecticut in the areas of environmental law, health care law, and insurance law. Additionally, eight lawyers were named Best Lawyers® 2026 “Lawyer of the Year.” A Best Lawyers® “Lawyer of the Year” designation is awarded to one lawyer in each of various high-profile specialties in large legal communities. These lawyers received the highest ratings among their peers for their abilities, professionalism, and integrity. They include: Hartford, CT – Best Lawyers® 2026 “Lawyer of the Year” Christine E. Bromberg – Tax Law Emilee Mooney Scott – Environmental Law Gregory R. Faulkner – Construction Law Joey Lee Miranda – Energy Law John B. Lynch, Jr. – Corporate Law John H. Mutchler – Copyright Law Michael R. Enright – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Providence, RI – Best Lawyers® 2026 “Lawyer of the Year” Roger A. Peters, II – Real Estate Law The sixth edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America was also released, which includes 14 Robinson+Cole lawyers. The “Ones to Watch” recognition is given to lawyers early in their careers for their outstanding professional excellence in private practice in the United States. The firm has the highest number of lawyers to receive this designation in Hartford, Connecticut. Inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America is determined through a comprehensive peer-review survey. The 2026 awards were created by analyzing over 3.4 million evaluations, assessing over 130,000 vetted nominees. Additional information regarding the Best Lawyers selection methodology can be read here. Congratulations to the following Robinson+Cole lawyers: Hartford, CT – Best Lawyers® Wystan M. Ackerman – Litigation -Insurance Kenneth C. Baldwin – Energy Law Bruce B. Barth – Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law Garry C. Berman – Real Estate Law Patrick M. Birney – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Lisa M. Boyle – Health Care Law Dan A. Brody – Commercial Litigation; Criminal Defense: White-Collar Christine E. Bromberg – Nonprofit / Charities Law; Tax Law Dennis C. Cavanaugh – Construction Law; Litigation-Construction Stephen O. Clancy – Commercial Litigation; Litigation - Insurance Thomas P. Cody – Real Estate Law Britt-Marie K. Cole-Johnson – Employment Law - Individuals; Employment Law - Management John L. Cordani – Litigation - Intellectual Property; Trade Secrets Law; Trademark Law Kevin P. Daly – Commercial Litigation Raymond T. DeMeo – Insurance Law Natale V. DiNatale – Employment Law - Management; Labor Law - Management Conor O. Duffy – Health Care Law Michael R. Enright – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law; Litigation - Bankruptcy Gregory R. Faulkner – Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Brian C. Freeman – Environmental Law; Litigation - Environmental Stephen E. Goldman – Insurance Law Matthew J. Guanci, Jr. – Corporate Law Edward J. Heath – Commercial Litigation Frederick E. Hedberg – Construction Law, Litigation - Construction Christopher J. Hug – Litigation - Construction Rachel V. Kushel – Employment Law - Management; Labor Law - Management John B. Lynch Jr. – Corporate Law; Mergers and Acquisitions Law Michael F. Maglio – Banking and Finance Law; Commercial Finance Law; Equipment Finance Law; Securitization and Structured Finance Law Virginia E. McGarrity – Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law Robert S. Melvin – Environmental Law; Litigation - Environmental Joey Lee Miranda – Energy Law; Energy Regulatory Law; Environmental Law Linda L. Morkan – Appellate Practice John H. Mutchler – Copyright Law; Patent Law; Trademark Law Megan R. Naughton – Immigration Law Martin A. Onorato – Construction Law; Litigation - Construction David M. Panico – Public Finance Law Earl W. Phillips, Jr. – Environmental Law James P. Ray – Environmental Law; Litigation - Environmental Edward J. Samorajczyk, Jr. – Corporate Law; Securities / Capital Markets Law Jacqueline Pennino Scheib – Copyright Law; Trademark Law Emilee Mooney Scott – Environmental Law Jonathan E. Small – Insurance Law Brian R. Smith – Land Use and Zoning Law Rhonda J. Tobin – Insurance Law Theodore J. Tucci – Health Care Law; Insurance Law Abby M. Warren – Employment Law - Management Jeffrey J. White – Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants William S. Wilson II – Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Hartford, CT - Ones to Watch Christopher A. Costain – Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Jason H. DePatie – Insurance Law Scott T. Garosshen – Appellate Practice Abigail L. Preissler – Banking and Finance Law; Corporate Law Stamford, CT – Best Lawyers®  Patrick W. Begos – Litigation - Insurance Gregory J. Bennici – Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance Thomas J. Donlon – Appellate Practice Steven L. Elbaum – Real Estate Law John H. Kane – Insurance Law Eric M. Kogan – Corporate Law Charles F. Martin III – Real Estate Law John F.X. Peloso Jr. – Litigation - Real Estate Patricia D. Weitzman – Health Care Law; Litigation - Health Care Stamford, CT - Ones to Watch Emily C. Deans – Energy Law Austin G. Provost – Real Estate Law Boston, MA - Best Lawyers® Joseph A. Barra – Construction Law Kendra L. Berardi – Real Estate Law Amanda S. Eckhoff – Real Estate Law Michael S. Giaimo – Land Use and Zoning Law; Real Estate Law E. Christopher Kehoe – Real Estate Law Matthew J. Lawlor – Land Use and Zoning Law; Real Estate Law Seth B. Orkand – Criminal Defense: General Practice, Criminal Defense: White-Collar Kathleen M. Porter – Information Technology Law Deirdre M. Robinson – Real Estate Law Boston, MA - Ones to Watch Jessica D. Bardi – Environmental Law; Land Use and Zoning Law; Litigation - Environmental Jonathan L. Cabot – Corporate Law; Public Finance Law Julianna M. Charpentier – Commercial Litigation; Litigation - Real Estate Jeffrey R. Gribouski – Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law; Litigation – Construction; Litigation – Environmental; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants New York, NY - Best Lawyers® Ian T. Clarke-Fisher – Litigation - Labor and Employment E. Evans Wohlforth, Jr. – Commercial Litigation New York, NY - Ones to Watch Janet (Zhanna) Kljyan – Commercial Litigation Albany, NY - Best Lawyers® Danielle H. Tangorre – Administrative / Regulatory Law; Elder Law; Health Care Law Philadelphia, PA - Best Lawyers® Laurie A. Krepto – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Philadelphia, PA - Ones to Watch Katherine M. Fix – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Wilmington, DE - Best Lawyers® Natalie D. Ramsey – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law; Litigation - Bankruptcy Providence, RI - Best Lawyers® William M. Daley – Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance Linn F. Freedman – Artificial Intelligence Law; Commercial Litigation; Privacy and Data Security Law Dana M. Horton – Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Patricia J. Igoe – Commercial Finance Law Roger A. Peters II – Real Estate Law Daniel F. Sullivan – Insurance Law George W. Watson III – Energy Regulatory Law Miami, FL -  Ones to Watch Audrey E. Goldman – Insurance Law Washington, DC - Ones to Watch Kyle G. Hepner – Intellectual Property Law; Litigation - Intellectual Property

Firm receives top listing in Connecticut lawyer count in national peer review survey
78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2026 teaser
August 15, 2024

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2025

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in <i>The Best Lawyers in America</i>© 2025 teaser
August 17, 2023

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2024

Best Lawyers in America
78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2024 teaser
August 26, 2025

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2026

The Best Lawyers in America© has named 78 Robinson+Cole lawyers across the firm’s practice groups and offices for inclusion in and recognition in its 2026 edition. The firm had 57 lawyers resident in its Connecticut offices named to the list and continues to have the highest number of recognized lawyers in the state. Robinson+Cole also has the highest number of listed lawyers in Connecticut in the areas of environmental law, health care law, and insurance law. Additionally, eight lawyers were named Best Lawyers® 2026 “Lawyer of the Year.” A Best Lawyers® “Lawyer of the Year” designation is awarded to one lawyer in each of various high-profile specialties in large legal communities. These lawyers received the highest ratings among their peers for their abilities, professionalism, and integrity. They include: Hartford, CT – Best Lawyers® 2026 “Lawyer of the Year” Christine E. Bromberg – Tax Law Emilee Mooney Scott – Environmental Law Gregory R. Faulkner – Construction Law Joey Lee Miranda – Energy Law John B. Lynch, Jr. – Corporate Law John H. Mutchler – Copyright Law Michael R. Enright – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Providence, RI – Best Lawyers® 2026 “Lawyer of the Year” Roger A. Peters, II – Real Estate Law The sixth edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America was also released, which includes 14 Robinson+Cole lawyers. The “Ones to Watch” recognition is given to lawyers early in their careers for their outstanding professional excellence in private practice in the United States. The firm has the highest number of lawyers to receive this designation in Hartford, Connecticut. Inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America is determined through a comprehensive peer-review survey. The 2026 awards were created by analyzing over 3.4 million evaluations, assessing over 130,000 vetted nominees. Additional information regarding the Best Lawyers selection methodology can be read here. Congratulations to the following Robinson+Cole lawyers: Hartford, CT – Best Lawyers® Wystan M. Ackerman – Litigation -Insurance Kenneth C. Baldwin – Energy Law Bruce B. Barth – Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law Garry C. Berman – Real Estate Law Patrick M. Birney – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Lisa M. Boyle – Health Care Law Dan A. Brody – Commercial Litigation; Criminal Defense: White-Collar Christine E. Bromberg – Nonprofit / Charities Law; Tax Law Dennis C. Cavanaugh – Construction Law; Litigation-Construction Stephen O. Clancy – Commercial Litigation; Litigation - Insurance Thomas P. Cody – Real Estate Law Britt-Marie K. Cole-Johnson – Employment Law - Individuals; Employment Law - Management John L. Cordani – Litigation - Intellectual Property; Trade Secrets Law; Trademark Law Kevin P. Daly – Commercial Litigation Raymond T. DeMeo – Insurance Law Natale V. DiNatale – Employment Law - Management; Labor Law - Management Conor O. Duffy – Health Care Law Michael R. Enright – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law; Litigation - Bankruptcy Gregory R. Faulkner – Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Brian C. Freeman – Environmental Law; Litigation - Environmental Stephen E. Goldman – Insurance Law Matthew J. Guanci, Jr. – Corporate Law Edward J. Heath – Commercial Litigation Frederick E. Hedberg – Construction Law, Litigation - Construction Christopher J. Hug – Litigation - Construction Rachel V. Kushel – Employment Law - Management; Labor Law - Management John B. Lynch Jr. – Corporate Law; Mergers and Acquisitions Law Michael F. Maglio – Banking and Finance Law; Commercial Finance Law; Equipment Finance Law; Securitization and Structured Finance Law Virginia E. McGarrity – Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law Robert S. Melvin – Environmental Law; Litigation - Environmental Joey Lee Miranda – Energy Law; Energy Regulatory Law; Environmental Law Linda L. Morkan – Appellate Practice John H. Mutchler – Copyright Law; Patent Law; Trademark Law Megan R. Naughton – Immigration Law Martin A. Onorato – Construction Law; Litigation - Construction David M. Panico – Public Finance Law Earl W. Phillips, Jr. – Environmental Law James P. Ray – Environmental Law; Litigation - Environmental Edward J. Samorajczyk, Jr. – Corporate Law; Securities / Capital Markets Law Jacqueline Pennino Scheib – Copyright Law; Trademark Law Emilee Mooney Scott – Environmental Law Jonathan E. Small – Insurance Law Brian R. Smith – Land Use and Zoning Law Rhonda J. Tobin – Insurance Law Theodore J. Tucci – Health Care Law; Insurance Law Abby M. Warren – Employment Law - Management Jeffrey J. White – Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants William S. Wilson II – Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Hartford, CT - Ones to Watch Christopher A. Costain – Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Jason H. DePatie – Insurance Law Scott T. Garosshen – Appellate Practice Abigail L. Preissler – Banking and Finance Law; Corporate Law Stamford, CT – Best Lawyers®  Patrick W. Begos – Litigation - Insurance Gregory J. Bennici – Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance Thomas J. Donlon – Appellate Practice Steven L. Elbaum – Real Estate Law John H. Kane – Insurance Law Eric M. Kogan – Corporate Law Charles F. Martin III – Real Estate Law John F.X. Peloso Jr. – Litigation - Real Estate Patricia D. Weitzman – Health Care Law; Litigation - Health Care Stamford, CT - Ones to Watch Emily C. Deans – Energy Law Austin G. Provost – Real Estate Law Boston, MA - Best Lawyers® Joseph A. Barra – Construction Law Kendra L. Berardi – Real Estate Law Amanda S. Eckhoff – Real Estate Law Michael S. Giaimo – Land Use and Zoning Law; Real Estate Law E. Christopher Kehoe – Real Estate Law Matthew J. Lawlor – Land Use and Zoning Law; Real Estate Law Seth B. Orkand – Criminal Defense: General Practice, Criminal Defense: White-Collar Kathleen M. Porter – Information Technology Law Deirdre M. Robinson – Real Estate Law Boston, MA - Ones to Watch Jessica D. Bardi – Environmental Law; Land Use and Zoning Law; Litigation - Environmental Jonathan L. Cabot – Corporate Law; Public Finance Law Julianna M. Charpentier – Commercial Litigation; Litigation - Real Estate Jeffrey R. Gribouski – Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law; Litigation – Construction; Litigation – Environmental; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants New York, NY - Best Lawyers® Ian T. Clarke-Fisher – Litigation - Labor and Employment E. Evans Wohlforth, Jr. – Commercial Litigation New York, NY - Ones to Watch Janet (Zhanna) Kljyan – Commercial Litigation Albany, NY - Best Lawyers® Danielle H. Tangorre – Administrative / Regulatory Law; Elder Law; Health Care Law Philadelphia, PA - Best Lawyers® Laurie A. Krepto – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Philadelphia, PA - Ones to Watch Katherine M. Fix – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Wilmington, DE - Best Lawyers® Natalie D. Ramsey – Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law; Litigation - Bankruptcy Providence, RI - Best Lawyers® William M. Daley – Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance Linn F. Freedman – Artificial Intelligence Law; Commercial Litigation; Privacy and Data Security Law Dana M. Horton – Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Patricia J. Igoe – Commercial Finance Law Roger A. Peters II – Real Estate Law Daniel F. Sullivan – Insurance Law George W. Watson III – Energy Regulatory Law Miami, FL -  Ones to Watch Audrey E. Goldman – Insurance Law Washington, DC - Ones to Watch Kyle G. Hepner – Intellectual Property Law; Litigation - Intellectual Property

Firm receives top listing in Connecticut lawyer count in national peer review survey
78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2026 teaser
August 15, 2024

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2025

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in <i>The Best Lawyers in America</i>© 2025 teaser
August 17, 2023

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2024

Best Lawyers in America
78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2024 teaser
June 19, 2023

Kate Dion, Brian Freeman and Mallori Thompson Discuss Strategies for Dealing with Mold in Dormitories in American School & University Article

American School & University
August 18, 2022

74 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America 2023

The Best Lawyers in America
August 19, 2021

65 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2022

July 20, 2021

Brian Freeman, Earl Phillips and Jon Schaefer Author Recycling Today Article on Auto Shredder Operations Related to Emissions and Environmental Justice

Recycling Today
October 14, 2020

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized by Super Lawyers®

Super Lawyers
August 20, 2020

61 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2021


June 19, 2023

Kate Dion, Brian Freeman and Mallori Thompson Discuss Strategies for Dealing with Mold in Dormitories in American School & University Article

American School & University
August 18, 2022

74 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America 2023

The Best Lawyers in America
August 19, 2021

65 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2022

July 20, 2021

Brian Freeman, Earl Phillips and Jon Schaefer Author Recycling Today Article on Auto Shredder Operations Related to Emissions and Environmental Justice

Recycling Today
October 14, 2020

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized by Super Lawyers®

Super Lawyers
August 20, 2020

61 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2021


Events


Past

Underground Storage Tanks: Buried Hazards in Connecticut’s Revised UST Regulations

Feb 18 2026
Environmental Business Council of New England (EBC) Webinar
Past

Selling Your Business or Buying Another’s: Top 4 Issues That Delay Closings

Apr 30 2024
National Energy & Fuels Institute's "Visions 2024" Conference
Past

Underground Storage Tanks: Buried Hazards in Connecticut’s Revised UST Regulations

Feb 18 2026
Environmental Business Council of New England (EBC) Webinar
Past

Selling Your Business or Buying Another’s: Top 4 Issues That Delay Closings

Apr 30 2024
National Energy & Fuels Institute's "Visions 2024" Conference
Past

Suing Government

Aug 15 2023
Energy Marketers of America 2023 State Executives Annual Meeting
Past

New air permitting and other requirements for Middlesex County, New Haven County, and Shelton, CT – Who, What, When

Jul 27 2023
Webinar
Past

Impacts of the Recent ‘Severe Ozone Nonattainment’ Reclassification in Connecticut

Dec 14 2022
Air & Waste Management Association – Connecticut Chapter
Past

Annual Update on Solid Waste Management for the State of Connecticut

Oct 13 2022
Environmental Business Council of New England
Past

Suing Government

Aug 15 2023
Energy Marketers of America 2023 State Executives Annual Meeting
Past

New air permitting and other requirements for Middlesex County, New Haven County, and Shelton, CT – Who, What, When

Jul 27 2023
Webinar
Past

Impacts of the Recent ‘Severe Ozone Nonattainment’ Reclassification in Connecticut

Dec 14 2022
Air & Waste Management Association – Connecticut Chapter
Past

Annual Update on Solid Waste Management for the State of Connecticut

Oct 13 2022
Environmental Business Council of New England

Environmental Law +


Below is an excerpt of Environmental Law + blog posts authored by Brian.

“Once In, Always In” for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Back to the Grave

After a few decades of uncertainty and “it’s-alive-it’s-dead-it’s-alive” swings, EPA’s “once in, always in” (OI/AI) policy is once again dead. And this time, it seems very dead. On June 20, 2025, President Trump signed a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution that rejects a September 2024 rule adopted by the Biden EPA that had revived a... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

EPA Turns Up the Pressure on Chemical Release Prevention and Preparation

On May 10, 2024, extensive revisions recently adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the Risk Management Program (RMP) regulations (40 CFR Part 68) will take effect. The revisions, dubbed by EPA as the “Safer Communities by Chemical Accident Prevention Rule,” reinstate certain Obama-era provisions previously rolled back under the Trump administration. However, the... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Connecticut’s Amended Environmental Justice Statute: Where Does It Stand?

Earlier this year, the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) released a “Connecticut Environmental Justice Public Participation Guidance Document” (‘the Guidance”) concerning the 2023 amendments to Connecticut’s environmental justice (EJ) statute regarding permitting or other approvals for certain facilities. Although helpful in indicating DEEP’s interpretation of the amended statute (which is not a model of... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

EPA Lowers the Fine Particulate NAAQS: A Closer Look at Implementation and Potential Impacts

On February 7, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released its Final Rule lowering the primary annual National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) from the current level of 12 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) to 9 μg/m3.  Once published, the Final Rule is certain to be challenged in... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

EPA to Increase Air Monitoring at Marine Ports

In a recent report, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) describes steps the EPA should take to increase air monitoring at marine ports and neighboring communities. While not agreeing to adopt all of the OIG’s recommendations, EPA has agreed to assess the air-monitoring network around ports and in near-port communities and... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Back From the Grave? “Once In, Always In” for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions

In the Byzantine complexity of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA’s “once in, always in” policy regarding hazardous air pollutants (HAP) has been particularly confounding.  And now it’s back in play, through regulatory revisions proposed by EPA in late September.   EPA’s proposal would prohibit a source from reducing its potential emissions of HAP to below... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

EPA’s Proposal to Tighten the Fine Particulate NAAQS: What’s Proposed, Who’s Potentially Impacted

On January 6, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a pre-publication copy of a Proposed Rule, which will lower the annual National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). PM2.5 refers to PM with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less, which is about 3-5 percent of the width of... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Ozone Nonattainment “Bump-up” in Connecticut: Is your facility about to get bumped into more stringent air regulations?

For air emission sources in New Haven County, Middlesex County, and Shelton, Connecticut, the regulatory landscape will change on November 7, 2022.  Per a regulation published on October 7, 2022, the EPA is reclassifying the extent to which air quality in these parts of the state has failed to attain a certain federal air quality... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

More Than a New Year’s Resolution: Connecticut Organics Recycling Mandate Expands in 2022

Perhaps not as glamorous as the Times Square crystal ball, but something else drops at the start of the New Year: The threshold for mandated food waste separation and recycling by certain industrial and commercial facilities in Connecticut. Legislation passed this year cut in half the annual tonnage of organic waste generation – from 52... Continue Reading

Visit Blog