Robinson Cole LLP
High Contrast Mode

Evan J. Seeman concentrates his practice in land use and zoning, real property litigation, and municipal law. Evan offers his clients – including developers, corporations, landowners, municipalities, and advocacy groups – strategic counsel on a broad range of often-complex real estate and land use matters. He works directly with planning professionals to help bring a project across the finish line. Evan is a member of our firm’s Real Estate + Development group.

Land Use – Zoning

Evan assists clients in navigating local, state and federal regulatory requirements for real estate development, helping them secure the necessary permits and approvals. He leads clients in securing zoning map and text amendments, special permits, site plan and subdivision approvals, variances, and wetlands permits. Evan works directly with planning professionals, including certified planners, civil engineers, architects, scientists, and appraisers. He routinely appears before local planning, zoning, and wetlands agencies. Evan utilizes his experience as a past Chair of the Planning & Law Division of the American Planning Association as well as his service on the Executive Board of the CT Chapter of the American Planning Association to undertake projects with a collaborative approach and see them through to completion.

Evan has represented clients in the permitting and development of industrial, manufacturing, commercial, residential, social service, philanthropic, and retail facilities. He obtained special permit approval for a cannabis cultivation and manufacturing operation in Hartford. The project involved the adaptive reuse of an existing 100,000-plus square foot former warehouse facility. Evan recently represented landowners in an application regarding the proposed redevelopment of waterfront property as an outdoor restaurant and beer garden along the Connecticut River. Evan also counsels clients on ways to increase the marketability of property and helps obtain rezoning and text amendment approval to accomplish this goal. He recently obtained text amendment approval to modify a community’s outdated and restrictive business park regulations to facilitate development of approximately 300 acres of vacant land. 

Evan also conducts land use due diligence for property acquisitions.  He performed such service on behalf of a corporation that acquired property in Fairfield County to be developed with two residential buildings of more than 400 units.

Real Property Litigation

Evan has been involved in dozens of administrative appeals. He successfully argued before the Connecticut Appellate Court a zoning appeal involving a planning and zoning commission's issuance of a special permit to a Greenwich, Connecticut food pantry serving those less fortunate. He advised a planning and zoning commission in Hartford County and subsequently represented them in litigation over an affordable housing application. Evan also successfully argued in Superior Court on behalf of the fourth oldest lighthouse in the United States to permit public tours as a legally permitted non-conforming use. He represented an applicant in reaching a favorable resolution in a wetlands appeal regarding a proposal to provide student housing for a university.  He also obtained dismissal of a zoning appeal challenging the re-zoning and special permit approved for youth baseball fields.

Evan handles many other real property disputes. He obtained judgment on behalf of a pharmaceutical client in a quiet title case defending a restrictive covenant that was challenged as an unfair restraint on trade. He is currently representing a property owner in Greenwich in a quiet title action to permit the development of property with affordable housing. Evan also represented a municipality and obtained the dismissal of an injunction action brought by neighboring property owners who contested municipal approval of a 130,000-square-foot ground mounted solar array system to generate energy for a local elementary school.

Evan’s experience includes representing clients in cases involving inverse condemnation, easements, restrictive covenants, First Amendment and equal protection issues, landlord/tenant disputes, and real property tax appeals. Evan also represents property owners in eminent domain matters, challenging both the condemning authority’s right to take property and the authority’s compensation for the property. He represented a landowner whose plans for a mixed-use development were thwarted when part of his land was condemned by a state agency. Evan was part of a team that tried the case and obtained nearly double the amount of damages assessed by the agency (almost $400,000 more in damages). He also has experience in advising condemning authorities in the eminent domain process.

Religious Land Use Litigation

Evan defends municipalities nationwide in cases involving the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). He advises municipalities on religious land use issues by:

  • Revising municipal zoning codes to comply with RLUIPA
  • Counseling municipal land use agencies during the zoning application process to avoid or mitigate potential liability
  • Defending municipalities in RLUIPA litigation in federal court

Evan has been involved in RLUIPA cases across the country concerning the permitting of a mosque, a rabbinical college, cemetery, and other religious uses. He counseled a Connecticut planning and zoning commission in real-time during the public hearing process to review a special permit application for a religious conference center. He also counseled a small community in the western U.S. regarding a zoning application for a religious ritual bath. Evan often speaks and writes about religious land use issues and contributes to the firm’s widely- acclaimed RLUIPA Defense blog.

Before joining the firm, Evan clerked for the Honorable F. Herbert Gruendel of the Connecticut Appellate Court.

  • University of Connecticut School of Law (Juris Doctor)
    • Connecticut Law Review, CONNtemplations Editor
  • Trinity College (Bachelors, with honors)
    • B.A., Russian Studies
    • President's Fellow in the Department of Modern Languages and Literature

  • State of Connecticut
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut

Selected as a Rising Star to the Connecticut Super Lawyers list from 2013 to 2023

Robinson+Cole Pro Bono Service Award Recipient, 2014

Connecticut Law Tribune, recognized in 2016 New Leaders in the Law Yearbook

Named to the Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence (CCADV) First 100 Plus Class of 2019 for demonstrating leadership and commitment to improving the lives of domestic violence survivors throughout Connecticut

American Planning Association
Amicus Curie Committee (2026)
Immediate Past Chair of Planning and Law Division (2021)
Chair of Planning and Law Division (2019 - 2020)
CM Law Credit Task Force (2020)
Chair, Law Content Review Committee (2019 - 2020)
Case Law Digest Advisory Committee of Planning & Law Division (2019 - Present)
Chair-Elect of Planning and Law Division (2017 - 2018)
Secretary/Treasurer of Planning and Law Division (2014 - 2016)
Education & Outreach Committee of Planning and Law Division (2012 - 2014)

American Planning Association, Connecticut Chapter
Member, Executive Board (2021 - present)
Co-Chair, Program Committee (2021 - present)
Government Affairs Committee (2016 - present)

Connecticut Bar Association
Planning & Zoning Section (2011 - Present)
Planning & Zoning Section, Co-chair (2024-2026)
Planning & Zoning Section, Secretary (2021 - Present)
Planning & Zoning Section, Legislative Liaison (2020 - 2021)
Planning & Zoning Section, Executive Committee (2019 - 2021)
Young Lawyers Section, Chair of Planning & Zoning Committee (2014 - 2015)
Young Lawyers Section, Chair of Municipal Law Committee (2012 - 2014)
Young Lawyers Section, Executive Committee (2012 - 2015)

Connecticut Bar Foundation James W. Cooper Fellow
American Bar Association
Section of State and Local Government Law (2011 - present)

Owners' Counsel of America
Affiliate Member (2018 - 2019)

Oliver Ellsworth American Inn of Court
Barrister (2012 - 2015)

Camp Courant
Chair, Development Committee
Board of Directors
Former Advisory Board

University of Connecticut School of Law
Former Alumni Mentor

Children's Law Center of Connecticut, Inc.

Experience


Religious Land Use Litigation: Cemetery

Defended municipality in federal lawsuit filed by church seeking to develop ninety acres of property in rural community as a religious cemetery. Prevailed on several claims at the summary judgment stage.

Religious Land Use Litigation: Soup Kitchen + Food Pantry

Negotiated a favorable settlement to allow a Norwich organization to operate a soup kitchen and food pantry which serves hundreds of individuals daily. Represented client in zoning applications and in three federal lawsuits after applications were denied by zoning agencies.

Read More

Land Use - Zoning: Food Pantry

Successfully argued before Connecticut Appellate Court a zoning appeal involving a planning and zoning commission’s issuance of a special permit to a Greenwich, Connecticut food pantry serving those less fortunate.



Publications


Legal Update: New Laws to Promote Affordable Housing Development teaser
December 3, 2025

Legal Update: New Laws to Promote Affordable Housing Development

June 2023

Recreational Marijuana in the Land of Steady Habits: How Towns in Connecticut are Zoning for Recreational Cannabis Use

Connecticut Planning, a quarterly magazine issued by the Connecticut Chapter of the American Planning Association (CCAPA)

The legislation that legalized cannabis use in Connecticut “…also empowered the state’s municipalities to regulate adult recreational cannabis establishments through local zoning codes or ordinances.” The authors surveyed the state’s 169 municipalities to identify regulatory trends and varying approaches taken by communities across the state. There are at least 90 municipalities that permit some form of cannabis establishments, with 72 of them having enacted their own regulations. Evan, Ryan and Chris examine and report how municipalities are dealing with related issues including where establishments are allowed, permitting and procedural considerations, distance separation requirements, security and odor issues, and visibility of products. Evan serves as CCAPA’s Program Committee Chair and is a member of the Executive Board. View the article.

March 4, 2022

Connecticut Supreme Court Finds Zoning Enabling Act Permits Planned Development Districts

Case Law Digest, an online publication of the American Planning Association’s Planning & Law Division

The Digest presents summaries of recent federal and state court decisions addressing issues at the intersection of planning and law, with takeaway lessons to assist planners and land use attorneys in their practice. Evan’s article takes a close look at Tillman v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Shelton, 341 Conn. 117 (2021). The case considered whether the Connecticut Zoning Enabling Act authorizes municipalities to permit planned development district (PDDs). A PDD is a zoning tool that is generally used to permit a mix of uses and dimensional elements that may not otherwise be allowed in a standard zoning district. The Supreme Court upheld the use of PDDs as flexible zoning techniques. Evan is the immediate Past Chair of the Planning & Law Division. View the article.

Legal Update: New Laws to Promote Affordable Housing Development teaser
December 3, 2025

Legal Update: New Laws to Promote Affordable Housing Development

June 2023

Recreational Marijuana in the Land of Steady Habits: How Towns in Connecticut are Zoning for Recreational Cannabis Use

Connecticut Planning, a quarterly magazine issued by the Connecticut Chapter of the American Planning Association (CCAPA)

The legislation that legalized cannabis use in Connecticut “…also empowered the state’s municipalities to regulate adult recreational cannabis establishments through local zoning codes or ordinances.” The authors surveyed the state’s 169 municipalities to identify regulatory trends and varying approaches taken by communities across the state. There are at least 90 municipalities that permit some form of cannabis establishments, with 72 of them having enacted their own regulations. Evan, Ryan and Chris examine and report how municipalities are dealing with related issues including where establishments are allowed, permitting and procedural considerations, distance separation requirements, security and odor issues, and visibility of products. Evan serves as CCAPA’s Program Committee Chair and is a member of the Executive Board. View the article.

March 4, 2022

Connecticut Supreme Court Finds Zoning Enabling Act Permits Planned Development Districts

Case Law Digest, an online publication of the American Planning Association’s Planning & Law Division

The Digest presents summaries of recent federal and state court decisions addressing issues at the intersection of planning and law, with takeaway lessons to assist planners and land use attorneys in their practice. Evan’s article takes a close look at Tillman v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Shelton, 341 Conn. 117 (2021). The case considered whether the Connecticut Zoning Enabling Act authorizes municipalities to permit planned development district (PDDs). A PDD is a zoning tool that is generally used to permit a mix of uses and dimensional elements that may not otherwise be allowed in a standard zoning district. The Supreme Court upheld the use of PDDs as flexible zoning techniques. Evan is the immediate Past Chair of the Planning & Law Division. View the article.

Legal Update: New CT Zoning Laws Look to Increase Housing Diversity and Affordability teaser
June 11, 2021

Legal Update: New CT Zoning Laws Look to Increase Housing Diversity and Affordability

Legal Update: Executive Order to Address Zoning Barriers to Re-opening Restaurants and Retail (COVID-19 Coronavirus) teaser
May 14, 2020

Legal Update: Executive Order to Address Zoning Barriers to Re-opening Restaurants and Retail (COVID-19 Coronavirus)

Legal Update: COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts on Land Use and Zoning (COVID-19 Coronavirus) teaser
May 12, 2020

Legal Update: COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts on Land Use and Zoning (COVID-19 Coronavirus)

March 24, 2020

No RLUIPA Violation in Religious Ballfield Case

Case Law Digest, an online publication of the American Planning Association’s Planning & Law Division

The article addresses a 2019 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, which affirmed a lower court’s summary judgment that found that the City of Kirkwood, Missouri did not violate the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) when it approved a lighting plan for a baseball stadium subject to conditions that allegedly deprived the field of meaningful use at night. View the article.  The Eighth Circuit’s decision is available here.

October 2019

Avoiding and Defending Against RLUIPA Claims

"Government Practice” special issue of Practical Law’s The Journal. © 2019 Thomson Reuters

The feature article explains how municipalities can effectively avoid and defend against RLUIPA claims. In particular, it provides an overview of regulation of religious land use, examines claims made against municipalities under RLUIPA, describes RLUIPA’s safe harbor provision, and offers guidance on counseling municipal officials on RLUIPA’s requirements.

June 7, 2018

Inverse Condemnation: Asserting the Ripeness in Federal Courts

Practical Law

The Practice Note provides considerations to government counsel on asserting the ripeness defense in Fifth Amendment takings or inverse condemnation claims. The Note discusses the Williamson County exhaustion and finality requirements, the futility exception, and procedural aspects of asserting the defense in a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment. View article here.



Legal Update: New CT Zoning Laws Look to Increase Housing Diversity and Affordability teaser
June 11, 2021

Legal Update: New CT Zoning Laws Look to Increase Housing Diversity and Affordability

Legal Update: Executive Order to Address Zoning Barriers to Re-opening Restaurants and Retail (COVID-19 Coronavirus) teaser
May 14, 2020

Legal Update: Executive Order to Address Zoning Barriers to Re-opening Restaurants and Retail (COVID-19 Coronavirus)

Legal Update: COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts on Land Use and Zoning (COVID-19 Coronavirus) teaser
May 12, 2020

Legal Update: COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts on Land Use and Zoning (COVID-19 Coronavirus)

March 24, 2020

No RLUIPA Violation in Religious Ballfield Case

Case Law Digest, an online publication of the American Planning Association’s Planning & Law Division

The article addresses a 2019 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, which affirmed a lower court’s summary judgment that found that the City of Kirkwood, Missouri did not violate the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) when it approved a lighting plan for a baseball stadium subject to conditions that allegedly deprived the field of meaningful use at night. View the article.  The Eighth Circuit’s decision is available here.

October 2019

Avoiding and Defending Against RLUIPA Claims

"Government Practice” special issue of Practical Law’s The Journal. © 2019 Thomson Reuters

The feature article explains how municipalities can effectively avoid and defend against RLUIPA claims. In particular, it provides an overview of regulation of religious land use, examines claims made against municipalities under RLUIPA, describes RLUIPA’s safe harbor provision, and offers guidance on counseling municipal officials on RLUIPA’s requirements.

June 7, 2018

Inverse Condemnation: Asserting the Ripeness in Federal Courts

Practical Law

The Practice Note provides considerations to government counsel on asserting the ripeness defense in Fifth Amendment takings or inverse condemnation claims. The Note discusses the Williamson County exhaustion and finality requirements, the futility exception, and procedural aspects of asserting the defense in a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment. View article here.


Events


Past

Annual Legal Update and Q&A Session

Jun 7 2024
American Planning Association Connecticut Chapter Hot Topics in Land Use Law & Practice 2024
Past

Statewide Planning - the Draft 2025-2030 Conservation and Development Policies Plan for Connecticut

Apr 5 2024
APA Connecticut Chapter
Past

Annual Legal Update and Q&A Session

Jun 7 2024
American Planning Association Connecticut Chapter Hot Topics in Land Use Law & Practice 2024
Past

Statewide Planning - the Draft 2025-2030 Conservation and Development Policies Plan for Connecticut

Apr 5 2024
APA Connecticut Chapter
Past

Zoning Appeals for Real Property Lawyers

Mar 15 2024
Fairfield County Bar Association Real Estate Committee
Past

A Planner’s Primer on Adaptive Reuse Incentives

Feb 26 2024
Connecticut Chapter of the American Planning Association (CCAPA)
Past

A Planner’s Primer on Adaptive Reuse Incentives

Feb 26 2024
Connecticut Chapter of the American Planning Association (CCAPA)
Past

CT Farmlink for Planners

Feb 2 2024
American Planning Association Connecticut Chapter
Past

Zoning Appeals for Real Property Lawyers

Mar 15 2024
Fairfield County Bar Association Real Estate Committee
Past

A Planner’s Primer on Adaptive Reuse Incentives

Feb 26 2024
Connecticut Chapter of the American Planning Association (CCAPA)
Past

A Planner’s Primer on Adaptive Reuse Incentives

Feb 26 2024
Connecticut Chapter of the American Planning Association (CCAPA)
Past

CT Farmlink for Planners

Feb 2 2024
American Planning Association Connecticut Chapter

News


December 23, 2025

Evan Seeman Appointed to the American Planning Association’s Amicus Curiae Committee

Real Estate + Development group partner Evan Seeman has been appointed to serve a one-year term on the American Planning Association’s (APA) Amicus Curiae Committee, effective January 1, 2026. The committee works to advance planning through the judicial process by filing “friend of the court” briefs in state and federal courts in select cases of national importance. Evan previously served as chair of the APA’s Planning & Law Division and currently serves on the APA’s Case Law Digest Advisory Committee of Planning & Law Division, as co-chair of the APA Connecticut Chapter’s (APA CT) Program Committee, and as a member of APA CT’s Executive Board and Government Affairs Committee.

August 28, 2024

Evan Seeman Elected as Co-Chair of the Connecticut Bar Association's Planning and Zoning Section

January 11, 2024

Evan Seeman Discusses History and Impact of Camp Courant on MetroHartford Alliance’s Pulse of the Region Podcast

December 23, 2025

Evan Seeman Appointed to the American Planning Association’s Amicus Curiae Committee

Real Estate + Development group partner Evan Seeman has been appointed to serve a one-year term on the American Planning Association’s (APA) Amicus Curiae Committee, effective January 1, 2026. The committee works to advance planning through the judicial process by filing “friend of the court” briefs in state and federal courts in select cases of national importance. Evan previously served as chair of the APA’s Planning & Law Division and currently serves on the APA’s Case Law Digest Advisory Committee of Planning & Law Division, as co-chair of the APA Connecticut Chapter’s (APA CT) Program Committee, and as a member of APA CT’s Executive Board and Government Affairs Committee.

August 28, 2024

Evan Seeman Elected as Co-Chair of the Connecticut Bar Association's Planning and Zoning Section

January 11, 2024

Evan Seeman Discusses History and Impact of Camp Courant on MetroHartford Alliance’s Pulse of the Region Podcast

October 26, 2023

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized in 2023 Super Lawyers®

Super Lawyers
June 8, 2023

Evan Seeman, Ryan Hoyler and Christopher Schaut Discuss Zoning for Recreational Cannabis Use in Connecticut Planning Article

Connecticut Planning
December 22, 2022

Robinson+Cole Elects Five New Partners

October 11, 2022

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized in 2022 Super Lawyers®

March 4, 2022

Evan Seeman Authors APA Article on CT Supreme Court Ruling on Zoning Enabling Act

APA Journal Case Law Digest
February 8, 2022

Evan Seeman Authors "CCAPA Program Updates" Column in Connecticut Planning Quarterly Magazine

Connecticut Planning

October 26, 2023

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized in 2023 Super Lawyers®

Super Lawyers
June 8, 2023

Evan Seeman, Ryan Hoyler and Christopher Schaut Discuss Zoning for Recreational Cannabis Use in Connecticut Planning Article

Connecticut Planning
December 22, 2022

Robinson+Cole Elects Five New Partners

October 11, 2022

Robinson+Cole Lawyers Recognized in 2022 Super Lawyers®

March 4, 2022

Evan Seeman Authors APA Article on CT Supreme Court Ruling on Zoning Enabling Act

APA Journal Case Law Digest
February 8, 2022

Evan Seeman Authors "CCAPA Program Updates" Column in Connecticut Planning Quarterly Magazine

Connecticut Planning

RLUIPA Defense Blog


Below is an excerpt of the RLUIPA Defense Blog posts authored by Evan.

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies RLUIPA Substantial Burden Inquiry

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently clarified how to determine whether a substantial burden on religious exercise exists for purposes of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). The case involves Vision Warriors Church, a “non-profit ministry that seeks to provide a faith-based community for men recovering from... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Eleventh Circuit Finds City of Mobile Violated Religious Freedom Laws

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently considered a long-running religious land use dispute involving the Thai Meditation Association of Alabama (TMAA) and the city of Mobile, Alabama. The dispute involves TMAA’s desire to convert a property zoned for residential use into a religious meditation center. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Massachusetts’ SJC Rules RV Camp Protected by Dover Amendment

The Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) of Massachusetts recently ruled that the RV Camp proposed by Hume Lake Christian Camps’ (Hume) was predominantly religious in nature and therefore qualified for protection under the Dover Amendment.  Similar to the federal Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act, the Dover Amendment is a Massachusetts law that limits a... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Fourth Circuit: Church Seeking to Operate as Brewery or Farm Winery Did Not State RLUIPA Claim

The Fourth Circuit has ruled against the Alive Church of the Nazarene’s claims that Prince William County, Virginia, violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLIUPA) by denying the Church the opportunity to worship on its 17-acre property before the Church complied with relevant zoning regulations. Alive Church of the Nazarene, Inc. v. Prince... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Madison, Wisconsin’s Denial of Athletic Field Lights Upheld Over Claims of Religious Discrimination

On December 30, 2022, a district court dismissed a Catholic high school’s RLUIPA challenge, granting summary judgment on all claims in favor of the City of Madison, Wisconsin and various other city officials (the City). As ruled by the court, the City did not discriminate against Edgewood High School of the Sacred Heart, Inc. on... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Court Rules Meriden, CT’s Zoning Regulations Discriminatory

A district court has ruled that the City of Meriden, Connecticut (the City) discriminated against Omar Islamic Center Inc. following the City’s denial of the Islamic Center’s application to move its mosque to another location. The Islamic Center (the Center) outgrew is prior location – a 1,200 square foot space above a pizza restaurant in... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Federal Court Dismisses RLUIPA Challenge to Missouri Emergency Public Health Orders

An interesting decision regarding RLUIPA and COVID-19 emergency public health orders was recently issued by a federal court in Missouri.  Recall that in the land use context, RLUIPA applies only to “land use regulations.”  The statute defines land use regulations as “a zoning or landmarking law, or the application of such law, that limits or... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

St. Pete Beach, Florida Enjoined from Prohibiting Church’s Beach Parking Lot Evangelism

A federal court in Florida recently ruled that Pass-A-Grille Beach Community Church, Inc. (Church) was likely to prevail on its RLUIPA substantial burden claim challenging the City of St. Pete Beach’s enforcement of parking regulations.  Since 1957, the Church has allowed the general public to use its parking lot free of charge to access the... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

First Circuit Rejects Signs For Jesus’ RLUIPA and Constitutional Appeal

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently found in favor of the Town of Pembroke, New Hampshire regarding the Town’s denial of an application for an electronic sign permit for religious messages.  The Town’s Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) denied the permit because it believed the sign would “detract from the rural... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Florida Court Finds RLUIPA Protects Transition Home for Registered Sex Offenders

If you are a municipality defending against a RLUIPA lawsuit, it is generally not a good sign when a court’s memorandum of decision begins with a string of biblical quotes.  Wakulla County Florida experienced this earlier this summer.  When granting a religious group’s motion for a preliminary injunction to operate a transition home, Judge Mark... Continue Reading

Visit Blog