Robinson Cole LLP
High Contrast Mode

James P. Ray has more than 30 years of experience as an environmental and product liability litigator and counselor, and he has served as court-appointed common counsel or liaison counsel in multiple environmental matters. These experiences, combined with a strong technical and business background, enable him to work effectively with engineers, scientists, other experts, and legal counsel to help clients minimize risk and solve toxic tort, enforcement, site remediation, compliance, and cost allocation challenges. Jim chairs our firm’s Environmental, Energy + Telecommunications group.

Common Counsel

Jim has been selected as coordinating or liaison counsel for joint defense groups and has been court-appointed common counsel for groups of defendants in a number of environmental disputes. He has represented groups in active environmental litigation and guided other groups through administrative proceedings and cost allocation efforts. At most sites, his efforts resulted in the groups quickly resolving their cost allocation disputes, thereby avoiding litigation and allowing him to lead the groups' efforts to promptly and cost-effectively (in some cases under budget) address the underlying environmental problems. These engagements typically involve sites with complicated scientific issues, a multitude of consultants and experts, numerous parties with different interests and levels of involvement, and document management challenges.

Environmental Litigation

Jim represents clients in toxic tort and environmental litigation at sites throughout the United States. These disputes arise under common law and environmental statutes, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; the Clean Water Act, and most other federal and state environmental statutes. His legal experience and technical background enable him to promptly evaluate cases and recommend an appropriate strategy to his clients, whether that involves preparing a case and taking it to trial or positioning the client to pursue a favorable settlement. He has obtained a number of favorable verdicts in cases brought under federal, state and common law causes of action.

Environmental Counseling + Dispute Resolution

Jim regularly serves on the Steering Committees at Superfund sites, represents clients in alternative dispute resolution efforts, counsels clients in connection with their compliance efforts under a multitude of environmental programs, and advises clients and insurers on site cleanup efforts and the costs and obligations related to such efforts. He works closely with his clients, experts and other lawyers to creatively solve his clients’ risk management challenges.

Product Liability

Jim defends lead-based paint, mold, asbestos, and product liability cases. He counsels clients involved in product recalls with the Consumer Product Safety Commission and has advised those clients on their reporting obligations and voluntary corrective action programs.

Before joining our firm, Jim worked as an engineer for the Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection (DEEP). His DEEP experience included enforcement and permitting under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and analysis of environmental considerations in litigation, real estate transactions, and bankruptcy. 

  • University of Connecticut School of Law (Juris Doctor, with honors)
  • University of Connecticut (Masters)
    • M.B.A., Business Administration
  • University of Connecticut (Bachelors, cum laude)
    • B.S., Chemical Engineering

  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  • State of Connecticut
  • State of New York
  • U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
  • U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

Listed in the 2026 edition of Benchmark Litigation as a Local Litigation Star for Connecticut in the area of Environmental Utilities

Ranked in Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business in the state of Connecticut in the area of Environment from 2011 to 2014 and since 2020

Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© as Hartford Lawyer of the Year in the area of Litigation - Environmental for 2021 and 2023

Selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© in the areas of Environmental Law from 2008 to 2015 and since 2018 as well as Litigation-Environmental for 2011, 2013, 2014, and since 2018

Selected to the Connecticut Super Lawyers list from 2012 to 2014, from 2017 to 2022, and 2025

Named a Thomson Reuters Stand-out Lawyer for 2025 and 2024

Listed in Who's Who Legal: The International Who's Who of Environment Lawyers 2011, 2013, 2014 (Copyright by Law Business Research Ltd)

American Bar Foundation
Fellow (2013 - Current)

American Bar Association
Environmental Litigation Committee, past co-chair (2011 - 2014)
Environmental Litigation, Products Liability and Mass Tort Committees' CLE Summit Co-chair, 1/2011 and 1/2005

American College of Environmental Lawyers
Fellow (2022)

Connecticut Bar Association
Environmental Law Section (1992 - present)

Connecticut Bar Foundation
James W. Cooper Fellow

Connecticut Business & Industry Association
Environmental Policies Council (1992 - present)

Lawyers Collaborative for Diversity
Executive Board Member (2002 - 2017)

National Conference for Community and Justice, Connecticut and Western Massachusetts
Board Member
Chair, Governance Committee

Connecticut Science Center
Programming Committee (2017)

Experience


Liaison Counsel: Drum Recycling Site

Served as de facto liaison counsel to a group of third party defendants at a drum recycling site involving projected response costs in excess of $150 million.

Liaison Counsel: Waste Oil Refinery Site

Selected (and approved by the court) as common counsel for a group of third-party generator defendants at a waste oil refinery site at which plaintiffs sought injunctive relief through an RCRA citizens suit, response costs under state and federal law, and diminution of property value under common law theories.

Read More

Liaison Counsel: Contaminated Municipal Water Supply

Counseled a large, privately held manufacturing client, and served as liaison counsel for other liable parties, in a project involving a contaminated municipal water supply well, regional and on-site ground water investigation and remediation efforts, on-site soils investigation and remediation, a mediated allocation process, contribution litigation, a natural resource damages settlement, and defense of toxic tort claims.

Read More


Publications


June 23, 2021

Centredale Manor (Again): First Circuit Affirms Approval of Consent Decree

Litigation News, a monthly newsletter from the ABA Litigation Section

 The article discusses a recent decision from the First Circuit approving the Consent Decree between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Emhart Industries for the cleanup of the Centredale Manor Restoration Project Superfund Site in North Providence, RI. Jim is actively involved in the Section’s Environmental & Energy Litigation Committee and has represented several parties in the Centredale Manor litigation. Members can read the article here.

March 5, 2021

Medical Monitoring?: Depends on Where You Live

Spring 2021 edition of the American Bar Association’s Section of Litigation Environmental & Energy Litigation Committee newsletter

The article examines three recent PFAS-related cases heard in Alabama, Vermont, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, each of which had a different outcome in its respective court. Jim writes, “Depending on the jurisdiction, the claim for medical monitoring may be asserted as an independent cause of action for medical monitoring but is more typically asserted as a form of relief based on another tort theory. But whether such a claim or request for relief is available varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.” View the article.

Summer 2020

Passaic River Litigation Spawns Decision in CERCLA 107/113 Debate

American Bar Association Section of Litigation's Environmental and Energy Litigation Committee newsletter

The article focuses on the issue of whether and when a potentially responsible party can bring a claim under section 107 of CERCLA.

June 23, 2021

Centredale Manor (Again): First Circuit Affirms Approval of Consent Decree

Litigation News, a monthly newsletter from the ABA Litigation Section

 The article discusses a recent decision from the First Circuit approving the Consent Decree between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Emhart Industries for the cleanup of the Centredale Manor Restoration Project Superfund Site in North Providence, RI. Jim is actively involved in the Section’s Environmental & Energy Litigation Committee and has represented several parties in the Centredale Manor litigation. Members can read the article here.

March 5, 2021

Medical Monitoring?: Depends on Where You Live

Spring 2021 edition of the American Bar Association’s Section of Litigation Environmental & Energy Litigation Committee newsletter

The article examines three recent PFAS-related cases heard in Alabama, Vermont, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, each of which had a different outcome in its respective court. Jim writes, “Depending on the jurisdiction, the claim for medical monitoring may be asserted as an independent cause of action for medical monitoring but is more typically asserted as a form of relief based on another tort theory. But whether such a claim or request for relief is available varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.” View the article.

Summer 2020

Passaic River Litigation Spawns Decision in CERCLA 107/113 Debate

American Bar Association Section of Litigation's Environmental and Energy Litigation Committee newsletter

The article focuses on the issue of whether and when a potentially responsible party can bring a claim under section 107 of CERCLA.

March 30, 2020

Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Two CERCLA Contribution Defendants

ABA Section of Litigation, Environmental & Energy Litigation Committee “Practice Point”

The article covers the “Lammers Barrel PRP Group v. Carboline Co.” decision, which “provides an interesting analysis of areas that one might normally consider prone to factual disputes.” View the article.

Winter 2019

PFAS Litigation: Just Getting Started?

American Bar Association Section of Litigation's Environmental and Energy Litigation Committee newsletter

The article focuses on some of the more significant types and examples of PFAS lawsuits pending or recently settled in courts across the country, and cautions that there is no indication that PFAS-related litigation, in which plaintiffs are claiming damages for personal injury, medical monitoring, and loss of property value, is likely to slow down anytime soon.

Legal Update: Environmental Enforcement Actions Could be Curtailed by New DOJ Policy teaser
February 14, 2018

Legal Update: Environmental Enforcement Actions Could be Curtailed by New DOJ Policy

November 17, 2017

Now What? Key Assumptions Underlying Centredale Manor Remedy Found Arbitrary and Capricious

ABA Environmental Litigation Section Newsletter

View the article.

Summer 2017

Paxil Case: Daubert Analysis Excludes Medical Causation Expert

American Bar Association Section of Litigation’s Expert Witnesses

The article discusses a case, K.E. v. Glaxosmithkline, in which a plaintiff alleged the anti-depression drug Paxil caused birth defects. The article covers how a judge in the U.S. District Court in Connecticut excluded the plaintiff’s medical causation expert on Daubert grounds after finding insufficient evidence of the plaintiff’s exposure to the drug, which was necessary to support the expert’s opinion on specific causation. After granting the motion to exclude the expert, the court granted summary judgment to the defendant, holding that the plaintiff could not proceed without expert causation testimony. View the article.

Fall 2015

Emhart v. United States: Another Failed Attempt to Prove Divisibility under CERCLA

Environmental Litigation

The article examines the Rhode Island District Court decision that found Emhart Industries liable for past and future response costs at the Centredale Manor Restoration Project Superfund Site in North Providence, Rhode Island. The authors discuss the litigation, Emhart's Liability, and the issue of divisibility. View the article.



March 30, 2020

Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Two CERCLA Contribution Defendants

ABA Section of Litigation, Environmental & Energy Litigation Committee “Practice Point”

The article covers the “Lammers Barrel PRP Group v. Carboline Co.” decision, which “provides an interesting analysis of areas that one might normally consider prone to factual disputes.” View the article.

Winter 2019

PFAS Litigation: Just Getting Started?

American Bar Association Section of Litigation's Environmental and Energy Litigation Committee newsletter

The article focuses on some of the more significant types and examples of PFAS lawsuits pending or recently settled in courts across the country, and cautions that there is no indication that PFAS-related litigation, in which plaintiffs are claiming damages for personal injury, medical monitoring, and loss of property value, is likely to slow down anytime soon.

Legal Update: Environmental Enforcement Actions Could be Curtailed by New DOJ Policy teaser
February 14, 2018

Legal Update: Environmental Enforcement Actions Could be Curtailed by New DOJ Policy

November 17, 2017

Now What? Key Assumptions Underlying Centredale Manor Remedy Found Arbitrary and Capricious

ABA Environmental Litigation Section Newsletter

View the article.

Summer 2017

Paxil Case: Daubert Analysis Excludes Medical Causation Expert

American Bar Association Section of Litigation’s Expert Witnesses

The article discusses a case, K.E. v. Glaxosmithkline, in which a plaintiff alleged the anti-depression drug Paxil caused birth defects. The article covers how a judge in the U.S. District Court in Connecticut excluded the plaintiff’s medical causation expert on Daubert grounds after finding insufficient evidence of the plaintiff’s exposure to the drug, which was necessary to support the expert’s opinion on specific causation. After granting the motion to exclude the expert, the court granted summary judgment to the defendant, holding that the plaintiff could not proceed without expert causation testimony. View the article.

Fall 2015

Emhart v. United States: Another Failed Attempt to Prove Divisibility under CERCLA

Environmental Litigation

The article examines the Rhode Island District Court decision that found Emhart Industries liable for past and future response costs at the Centredale Manor Restoration Project Superfund Site in North Providence, Rhode Island. The authors discuss the litigation, Emhart's Liability, and the issue of divisibility. View the article.


News


December 18, 2025

Robinson+Cole and Rhonda Tobin Receive “Business Excellence” Award at 2025 Equal Opportunity Gala

Robinson+Cole and firm Managing Partner Rhonda Tobin were honored at the 2025 Urban League of Greater Hartford’s (ULGH) 61st Annual Equal Opportunity Day Gala as the 2025 Business Excellence awardee on December 11, 2025. The recognition highlights Rhonda and the firm’s exceptional business impact and commitment to equality and opportunity in the Greater Hartford region. Through the Pro Bono Partnership, which has long served as a bridge between ULGH and Robinson+Cole, a growing team of lawyers has ULGH helped advance critical priorities, including Bruce Barth, Catherine Cuggino, Robert Foxworth, Matthew Guanci, Samuel Maduabueke, and Eden Yerby. The gala celebrated those who help support and fund the ULGH’s programs and services to fight against discrimination and help Hartford area residents overcome barriers to achieve their life goals. Robinson + Cole was proud to be a sponsor of the event.

Urban League of Greater Hartford
Robinson+Cole and Rhonda Tobin Receive “Business Excellence” Award at 2025 Equal Opportunity Gala teaser
December 15, 2025

Environmental, Energy + Telecommunications Group Volunteers to Provide Affordable Access to Food with Levo International

Environmental, Energy + Telecommunications Group Volunteers to Provide Affordable Access to Food with Levo International teaser
November 6, 2025

Robinson+Cole Commends 62 Attorneys Recognized in 2025 Super Lawyers®

Recognition spans key regions and highlights the firm’s seasoned practitioners and emerging leaders in many business transactions and litigation practices
Robinson+Cole Commends 62 Attorneys Recognized in 2025 <i>Super Lawyers</i>® teaser
December 18, 2025

Robinson+Cole and Rhonda Tobin Receive “Business Excellence” Award at 2025 Equal Opportunity Gala

Robinson+Cole and firm Managing Partner Rhonda Tobin were honored at the 2025 Urban League of Greater Hartford’s (ULGH) 61st Annual Equal Opportunity Day Gala as the 2025 Business Excellence awardee on December 11, 2025. The recognition highlights Rhonda and the firm’s exceptional business impact and commitment to equality and opportunity in the Greater Hartford region. Through the Pro Bono Partnership, which has long served as a bridge between ULGH and Robinson+Cole, a growing team of lawyers has ULGH helped advance critical priorities, including Bruce Barth, Catherine Cuggino, Robert Foxworth, Matthew Guanci, Samuel Maduabueke, and Eden Yerby. The gala celebrated those who help support and fund the ULGH’s programs and services to fight against discrimination and help Hartford area residents overcome barriers to achieve their life goals. Robinson + Cole was proud to be a sponsor of the event.

Urban League of Greater Hartford
Robinson+Cole and Rhonda Tobin Receive “Business Excellence” Award at 2025 Equal Opportunity Gala teaser
December 15, 2025

Environmental, Energy + Telecommunications Group Volunteers to Provide Affordable Access to Food with Levo International

Environmental, Energy + Telecommunications Group Volunteers to Provide Affordable Access to Food with Levo International teaser
November 6, 2025

Robinson+Cole Commends 62 Attorneys Recognized in 2025 Super Lawyers®

Recognition spans key regions and highlights the firm’s seasoned practitioners and emerging leaders in many business transactions and litigation practices
Robinson+Cole Commends 62 Attorneys Recognized in 2025 <i>Super Lawyers</i>® teaser
August 26, 2025

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2026

Firm receives top listing in Connecticut lawyer count in national peer review survey
78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2026 teaser
June 5, 2025

Robinson+Cole Secures 45 Total Rankings in Chambers USA 2025 Guide

Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business
Robinson+Cole Secures 45 Total Rankings in <i>Chambers USA 2025</i> Guide teaser
May 7, 2025

Six Robinson+Cole Attorneys Named 2025 Stand-out Lawyers

Thomson Reuters
August 15, 2024

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2025

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in <i>The Best Lawyers in America</i>© 2025 teaser
June 6, 2024

2024 Chambers USA Recognizes 24 Robinson+Cole Lawyers in Nine Practice Areas

Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business
2024 <i>Chambers USA</i> Recognizes 24 Robinson+Cole Lawyers in Nine Practice Areas teaser
March 15, 2024

Five Robinson+Cole Attorneys Named Thomson Reuters Stand-out Lawyers

Thomson Reuters

August 26, 2025

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2026

Firm receives top listing in Connecticut lawyer count in national peer review survey
78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2026 teaser
June 5, 2025

Robinson+Cole Secures 45 Total Rankings in Chambers USA 2025 Guide

Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business
Robinson+Cole Secures 45 Total Rankings in <i>Chambers USA 2025</i> Guide teaser
May 7, 2025

Six Robinson+Cole Attorneys Named 2025 Stand-out Lawyers

Thomson Reuters
August 15, 2024

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2025

78 Robinson+Cole Lawyers Listed in <i>The Best Lawyers in America</i>© 2025 teaser
June 6, 2024

2024 Chambers USA Recognizes 24 Robinson+Cole Lawyers in Nine Practice Areas

Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business
2024 <i>Chambers USA</i> Recognizes 24 Robinson+Cole Lawyers in Nine Practice Areas teaser
March 15, 2024

Five Robinson+Cole Attorneys Named Thomson Reuters Stand-out Lawyers

Thomson Reuters

Events


Past

Implications of the 'Maui' Case

Mar 20 2024
2024 DRI Toxic Torts and Environmental Law Seminar
Past

Beyond GHG, EJ, ESG – OMG, (2023): To – PFAS (2024): More About Protecting Your Assets

Feb 6 2024
International Liquid Terminals Association Environment, Health, Safety & Security Committee Spring Meeting
Past

Implications of the 'Maui' Case

Mar 20 2024
2024 DRI Toxic Torts and Environmental Law Seminar
Past

Beyond GHG, EJ, ESG – OMG, (2023): To – PFAS (2024): More About Protecting Your Assets

Feb 6 2024
International Liquid Terminals Association Environment, Health, Safety & Security Committee Spring Meeting
Past

Climate Change, Environmental Justice, and ESG – Impact on the Terminal Industry

Mar 14 2023
International Liquid Terminals Association’s (ILTA) EHS&S (Environmental, Health, Safety and Security) Spring Committee Meetings
Past

ESG in 2022: Challenges & Opportunities for Public and Private Corporations

Mar 15 2022
Association of Corporate Counsel
Past

Industry Under Attack: The Rise of Citizen Suits, Class Actions, and Other Tactics to Fight Manufacturers and Unpopular Facilities

Oct 21 2021
Past

Industry Under Attack: Panel Discussion – Case Studies, Best Practices, and Strategies from the Trenches

Oct 21 2021
Past

Climate Change, Environmental Justice, and ESG – Impact on the Terminal Industry

Mar 14 2023
International Liquid Terminals Association’s (ILTA) EHS&S (Environmental, Health, Safety and Security) Spring Committee Meetings
Past

ESG in 2022: Challenges & Opportunities for Public and Private Corporations

Mar 15 2022
Association of Corporate Counsel
Past

Industry Under Attack: The Rise of Citizen Suits, Class Actions, and Other Tactics to Fight Manufacturers and Unpopular Facilities

Oct 21 2021
Past

Industry Under Attack: Panel Discussion – Case Studies, Best Practices, and Strategies from the Trenches

Oct 21 2021