Robinson Cole LLP
High Contrast Mode

Kathleen E. Dion focuses her practice on providing counseling and dispute resolution advice to colleges, universities, independent schools, childcare centers, and organizations serving children and youths. In addition, she has a nationwide practice litigating complex civil cases and defending individuals and companies in white-collar criminal matters. Kate chairs our firm’s interdisciplinary Education Industry team and is a member of our firm’s Business Litigation group and Internal Investigations and Corporate Compliance team.

Education Law

Kate has a deep understanding of the present and future challenges facing educational entities and youth organizations, and thus is able to uniquely represent and counsel her clients on a variety of complex legal issues while also maintaining a focus on the institution’s larger, longer-term objectives. Because of her extensive experience serving as outside general counsel to universities and independent schools, she is well positioned to offer expert technical counsel to clients in a personable manner reflecting her appreciation of the complex and sensitive subject matters facing her clients. She works closely with an institution’s leadership team to solve problems in unique and creative ways to the maximum benefit of the institution.

Kate counsels education clients in a broad range of areas, including crisis management, protection of minors, sexual misconduct allegations and Title IX compliance, student discipline matters, disability accommodations, Clery Act compliance and campus security issues, Family Education Rights and Privacy Act compliance, reviewing, revising and implementing handbooks and necessary policies, contracts, NCAA compliance, and governance matters. She also serves as a Title IX investigator, advisor and decision-maker.

Kate assists childcare centers and organizations serving youth and children in responding to government investigations, conducting internal investigations, regulatory compliance, protection of minors, crisis counseling and development of policies and handbooks.

When it is not possible to avoid litigation, Kate is a skilled advocate representing clients in high-stakes, highly sensitive lawsuits in state and federal courts.

Complex Civil Litigation

Kate represents clients across the country in a variety of business disputes. Her courtroom experience ranges from federal and state jury trials to arbitrations and administrative hearings. She has represented financial services companies, health care organizations and defense contractors, among other clients. Kate’s successes include obtaining a favorable mid-trial settlement for a defense contractor in a dispute involving allegations of breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. She has successfully argued appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the Connecticut Supreme Court and the Connecticut Appellate Court.

Government Enforcement and White-Collar Criminal Defense

Kate assists public and private companies with internal investigations on a variety of matters, including financial wrongdoing and regulatory non-compliance. While investigating the embezzlement of hundreds of thousands of dollars from a health care organization, she obtained a full confession from the former chief financial officer and helped coordinate with federal agencies, which led to the CFO's criminal conviction. She has assisted with multiple corporate embezzlement investigations, helping to catch those responsible and recover stolen funds.

Kate has tried serious felony criminal cases in state and federal court and is active in the criminal defense bar. She is regularly court appointed to defend clients in criminal matters and has been recognized by the Federal District Court for the District of Connecticut for making substantial contributions in this area.

Pro Bono

Kate has devoted significant time to the representation of pro bono clients. She was part of a group of Robinson+Cole attorneys whose legal assistance ultimately allowed a soup kitchen and food pantry to remain open, despite attempts by the local municipality to close them. She participates in our firm’s Domestic Violence Restraining Order program, which provides free legal services to victims of family violence. Kate also successfully argued an appeal before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals for a prisoner on a civil rights claim. She was the recipient of the firm’s Pro Bono Service Award in 2013.

Kate is a member of the firm’s Data Privacy + Cybersecurity team, and regularly contributes to the firm’s Data Privacy + Security Insider publication, writing about Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act and Fourth Amendment issues. She also contributes to the Health Law Diagnosis blog. Prior to joining the firm, she served as a law clerk to the Honorable Robert E. Beach of the Connecticut Appellate Court.

  • Western New England University School of Law (Juris Doctor, magna cum laude)
    • Western New England Law Review, Editor
  • University of Massachusetts (Bachelors, magna cum laude)
    • B.A., History

  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  • State of Connecticut
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
  • U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts

Ranked in Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business in the State of Connecticut in the area of Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations for 2025

Listed in Benchmark Litigation as a Local Litigation Star in Connecticut in the area of White Collar Crime for 2025 and 2026

Presented with the 2025 Dean’s Alumni Excellence Award  from Western New England University School of Law

Recognized by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly as a 2024 “Massachusetts Go To Lawyer” in the area of Higher Education

Selected to the Connecticut Super Lawyers list for 2024 and 2025

Selected as a Rising Star to the Connecticut Super Lawyers list from 2016 to 2019

Recognized as a "40 Under Forty" winner by BusinessWest for 2018

Connecticut Law Tribune, recognized in 2017 New Leaders in the Law Yearbook

Presented with the Ascending Alumni Award and the Distinguished Law Review Alumni Award from Western New England University School of Law in 2019

Robinson+Cole Pro Bono Service Award Recipient, 2013

Named to the Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence (CCADV) First 100 Plus Class of 2018 for demonstrating leadership and commitment to improving the lives of domestic violence survivors throughout Connecticut

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
Appointee, Criminal Justice Act (CJA) Standing Committee

Connecticut Bar Association
Member, Education Law Section
Former Consumer Law Committee Co-chair, Young Lawyers Section Executive Committee
Former Education Law Committee Co-chair, Young Lawyers Section Executive Committee
Former Federal Practice Committee Chair, Young Lawyers Section Executive Committee

American Bar Association

Massachusetts Bar Association

Women's White Collar Defense Association

Connecticut Bar Foundation
James W. Cooper Fellow

Junior Achievement of Southwest New England
Board of Directors

KNOX
Board of Directors, Secretary (2015 - 2018)

Longmeadow Educational Excellence Foundation
Former President Emeritus

Longmeadow Montessori Internationale
Board Member (2014 - 2018)

Experience


Investigations + Criminal Defense: Criminal Justice Act Client Representation

Represented Criminal Justice Act client through all stages of federal prosecution by United States Attorney’s Office, including month long jury trial.

Investigations + Criminal Defense: IRS Investigations

Represented various clients as targets and witnesses in Internal Revenue Service investigations.

Investigations + Criminal Defense: Sexual Assault Acquittal

Obtained the acquittal of an individual who had been charged with sexual assault.



Publications


November 19, 2025

Here are 3 big AI-related legal issues for higher ed

University Business

As artificial intelligence rapidly transforms the landscape of higher education, college and university administrators are finding themselves on the frontlines of new, and sometimes unprecedented, legal challenges. While much of the public discourse has focused on students using AI tools to cheat, the legal implications for administrators are far broader. From data privacy laws to anti-discrimination requirements and the complexities of policy development, the legal environment is evolving just as quickly as the technology itself. This article identifies three significant AI-related legal issues facing higher education administrators—and provides actionable suggestions to navigate these challenges. Data privacy, security, and compliance The Challenge AI systems in higher education collect and process large amounts of personal and institutional data, including student records, behavioral analytics and, increasingly, biometric information. Administrators face overlapping data privacy laws, including the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, evolving state privacy statutes, and international regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation. These laws establish strict requirements for how student and institutional data must be collected, stored and shared, and they are designed to protect individual privacy and prevent unauthorized access or misuse of sensitive information. As AI technologies become more pervasive, ensuring compliance with these regulations is crucial to avoid legal penalties and maintain trust within the academic community. AI-driven platforms often share data with third-party vendors, raising substantial questions about consent, control and oversight. As we enter a new year, the legal liability for data breaches or improper sharing is heightened by increased regulatory enforcement and class action litigation regarding student and employee data privacy. To protect against this liability: Ensure contracts with third-party vendors require compliance with all relevant privacy laws and set clear protocols for breach notification and data handling Provide clear, advance notice and obtain valid consent whenever personal data, especially sensitive or student/employee data, is collected or shared Collect and retain only the minimum amount of data necessary for the stated purpose Continually audit vendors and internal processes for compliance, and quickly address potential vulnerabilities Have robust response plans for breaches, and be prepared with documentation of compliance efforts. Practical steps for administrators Audit existing data practices: Proactively conduct an audit of all AI systems and third-party vendors to map data flows and ensure compliance with current federal and state laws and regularly review how institutional stakeholders use and input information into AI systems. Update contracts: Strengthen contract language with vendors to mandate compliance with privacy standards, notification protocols, and data protection requirements. Develop clear policies: Draft and disseminate clear institutional privacy and contracting policies tailored to AI tools and ensure ongoing training for staff and students. Algorithmic bias and discrimination risks The Challenge AI systems used for admissions, grading, advising and faculty hiring can inadvertently perpetuate or amplify bias, potentially running afoul of federal antidiscrimination laws such as Title VI, Title IX and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Algorithms trained on historical data may entrench past inequities, and lack of transparency can make it difficult to audit decision-making. Litigation and regulatory actions alleging disparate impact and failure to prevent discrimination are increasing, putting institutional reputation and accreditation at risk. Institutions adopting AI systems in admissions, evaluation and other critical processes must proactively address potential sources of bias and ensure compliance with relevant antidiscrimination laws. Key lessons include the importance of ongoing auditing and transparency in AI decision-making, involving diverse stakeholders in system design, and regularly updating algorithms to reflect current, equitable standards rather than outdated or biased historical data. Proactive risk management, including legal reviews and bias mitigation strategies, not only helps avoid liability but also upholds institutional values of fairness, inclusion, and integrity. Practical Steps for Administrators Assess and monitor AI systems: Require regular, independent testing of AI systems for evidence of disparate impact or discriminatory outcomes. Demand explainable AI: Insist that vendors provide audit trails and “explainability” features for all decision-making algorithms. Build diverse oversight panels: Establish interdisciplinary committees—including legal, ethics, IT and DEI representatives—to oversee adoption and review of AI tools. Academic integrity and AI-generated content The Challenge While AI-enabled cheating is top-of-mind, the legal issues go deeper: unclear policies about AI use, inconsistent enforcement and concerns about due process. Ambiguous rules expose institutions to challenges by students and faculty alike, particularly when disciplinary action is taken. Federal grant agencies are increasingly regulating the use of AI in applications, with some restricting or requiring disclosures where AI-generated content is included. Defining and enforcing what constitutes permissible AI use will be a central legal and reputational challenge for institutions next year and beyond. Practical steps for administrators Clarify codes of conduct: Update student and faculty codes of conduct to explicitly address AI and its varied uses in academic work. Ensure procedural fairness: Prepare due process protocols and hearing procedures for alleged AI-related infractions, to reduce the risk of successful legal challenges. Educate the community: Launch ongoing educational campaigns highlighting ethical AI use, provide guidance on distinguishing between collaboration and misconduct, and provide timely information on compliance with federal regulations and agency-specific guidance on the use of AI in sponsored programs. Leading in a new era For higher ed administrators, successfully navigating the legal landscape of AI in 2026 demands a proactive, multidisciplinary approach. By prioritizing data privacy, guarding against algorithmic bias and updating policies around academic integrity, institutions can mitigate risk while harnessing the benefits of AI. Implementing these practical measures will position universities not merely to comply with the law, but to lead in this new era of technology-enhanced education.

Legal Update: Federal Court Enjoins NCAA’s “Five-Year Rule” for JUCO Athletes teaser
November 4, 2025

Legal Update: Federal Court Enjoins NCAA’s “Five-Year Rule” for JUCO Athletes

February 11, 2025

AI is transforming higher ed: What you need for compliance and governance

University Business

As generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into higher education…it raises concerns about its ethical and effective use, including data privacy and security issues around the data input into these AI systems, and the potential for algorithm bias. Co-authors Kate Dion and Kathryn Rattigan suggest that as colleges and universities tackle this new era of generative AI, they may wish to consider implementing an AI governance program. The authors identify several key aspects that an AI governance program should encompass including data governance and privacy, risk management and continuous monitoring and improvement. “By integrating these components, a university can develop a robust AI governance program that aligns with ethical standards, ensures data protection, and fosters a safe and inclusive educational environment.” Read the article.

November 19, 2025

Here are 3 big AI-related legal issues for higher ed

University Business

As artificial intelligence rapidly transforms the landscape of higher education, college and university administrators are finding themselves on the frontlines of new, and sometimes unprecedented, legal challenges. While much of the public discourse has focused on students using AI tools to cheat, the legal implications for administrators are far broader. From data privacy laws to anti-discrimination requirements and the complexities of policy development, the legal environment is evolving just as quickly as the technology itself. This article identifies three significant AI-related legal issues facing higher education administrators—and provides actionable suggestions to navigate these challenges. Data privacy, security, and compliance The Challenge AI systems in higher education collect and process large amounts of personal and institutional data, including student records, behavioral analytics and, increasingly, biometric information. Administrators face overlapping data privacy laws, including the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, evolving state privacy statutes, and international regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation. These laws establish strict requirements for how student and institutional data must be collected, stored and shared, and they are designed to protect individual privacy and prevent unauthorized access or misuse of sensitive information. As AI technologies become more pervasive, ensuring compliance with these regulations is crucial to avoid legal penalties and maintain trust within the academic community. AI-driven platforms often share data with third-party vendors, raising substantial questions about consent, control and oversight. As we enter a new year, the legal liability for data breaches or improper sharing is heightened by increased regulatory enforcement and class action litigation regarding student and employee data privacy. To protect against this liability: Ensure contracts with third-party vendors require compliance with all relevant privacy laws and set clear protocols for breach notification and data handling Provide clear, advance notice and obtain valid consent whenever personal data, especially sensitive or student/employee data, is collected or shared Collect and retain only the minimum amount of data necessary for the stated purpose Continually audit vendors and internal processes for compliance, and quickly address potential vulnerabilities Have robust response plans for breaches, and be prepared with documentation of compliance efforts. Practical steps for administrators Audit existing data practices: Proactively conduct an audit of all AI systems and third-party vendors to map data flows and ensure compliance with current federal and state laws and regularly review how institutional stakeholders use and input information into AI systems. Update contracts: Strengthen contract language with vendors to mandate compliance with privacy standards, notification protocols, and data protection requirements. Develop clear policies: Draft and disseminate clear institutional privacy and contracting policies tailored to AI tools and ensure ongoing training for staff and students. Algorithmic bias and discrimination risks The Challenge AI systems used for admissions, grading, advising and faculty hiring can inadvertently perpetuate or amplify bias, potentially running afoul of federal antidiscrimination laws such as Title VI, Title IX and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Algorithms trained on historical data may entrench past inequities, and lack of transparency can make it difficult to audit decision-making. Litigation and regulatory actions alleging disparate impact and failure to prevent discrimination are increasing, putting institutional reputation and accreditation at risk. Institutions adopting AI systems in admissions, evaluation and other critical processes must proactively address potential sources of bias and ensure compliance with relevant antidiscrimination laws. Key lessons include the importance of ongoing auditing and transparency in AI decision-making, involving diverse stakeholders in system design, and regularly updating algorithms to reflect current, equitable standards rather than outdated or biased historical data. Proactive risk management, including legal reviews and bias mitigation strategies, not only helps avoid liability but also upholds institutional values of fairness, inclusion, and integrity. Practical Steps for Administrators Assess and monitor AI systems: Require regular, independent testing of AI systems for evidence of disparate impact or discriminatory outcomes. Demand explainable AI: Insist that vendors provide audit trails and “explainability” features for all decision-making algorithms. Build diverse oversight panels: Establish interdisciplinary committees—including legal, ethics, IT and DEI representatives—to oversee adoption and review of AI tools. Academic integrity and AI-generated content The Challenge While AI-enabled cheating is top-of-mind, the legal issues go deeper: unclear policies about AI use, inconsistent enforcement and concerns about due process. Ambiguous rules expose institutions to challenges by students and faculty alike, particularly when disciplinary action is taken. Federal grant agencies are increasingly regulating the use of AI in applications, with some restricting or requiring disclosures where AI-generated content is included. Defining and enforcing what constitutes permissible AI use will be a central legal and reputational challenge for institutions next year and beyond. Practical steps for administrators Clarify codes of conduct: Update student and faculty codes of conduct to explicitly address AI and its varied uses in academic work. Ensure procedural fairness: Prepare due process protocols and hearing procedures for alleged AI-related infractions, to reduce the risk of successful legal challenges. Educate the community: Launch ongoing educational campaigns highlighting ethical AI use, provide guidance on distinguishing between collaboration and misconduct, and provide timely information on compliance with federal regulations and agency-specific guidance on the use of AI in sponsored programs. Leading in a new era For higher ed administrators, successfully navigating the legal landscape of AI in 2026 demands a proactive, multidisciplinary approach. By prioritizing data privacy, guarding against algorithmic bias and updating policies around academic integrity, institutions can mitigate risk while harnessing the benefits of AI. Implementing these practical measures will position universities not merely to comply with the law, but to lead in this new era of technology-enhanced education.

Legal Update: Federal Court Enjoins NCAA’s “Five-Year Rule” for JUCO Athletes teaser
November 4, 2025

Legal Update: Federal Court Enjoins NCAA’s “Five-Year Rule” for JUCO Athletes

February 11, 2025

AI is transforming higher ed: What you need for compliance and governance

University Business

As generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into higher education…it raises concerns about its ethical and effective use, including data privacy and security issues around the data input into these AI systems, and the potential for algorithm bias. Co-authors Kate Dion and Kathryn Rattigan suggest that as colleges and universities tackle this new era of generative AI, they may wish to consider implementing an AI governance program. The authors identify several key aspects that an AI governance program should encompass including data governance and privacy, risk management and continuous monitoring and improvement. “By integrating these components, a university can develop a robust AI governance program that aligns with ethical standards, ensures data protection, and fosters a safe and inclusive educational environment.” Read the article.

November 5, 2024

Where Are New Title IX Regulations Not Enforceable?

By August 1, 2024, educational institutions across the country were required to implement the Biden administration’s new regulations concerning Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which contained numerous expansions on the law’s protections. As anticipated, litigation followed, resulting in district courts issuing preliminary injunctions barring enforcement throughout the country. As of now, the 2024 regulations are enjoined from being enforced in nearly 26 states. While the litigations play out in due course, institutions in affected states will want to be on the lookout for any changes to these preliminary injunctions, and consider whether any state laws weigh into their consideration to amend their policies consistent with the new regulations. Read the article.

August 16, 2024

Schools Need To Consider These Seven Key Questions/New Title IX Compliance

BusinessWest

With the start of this new academic year, schools in jurisdictions not covered by a Federal injunction or listed here were required to comply with the new Title IX regulations by August 1, 2024. In their article, Kate and Sabrina share a list of top questions federally funded institutions are urged to have answers for. “[A]s institutions ensure compliance with the new regulations, it would not be surprising to see schools continue to revise policies based on how the new procedures pan out in practice,” Kate and Sabrina write. “This is especially true given that the new regulations give schools more autonomy in deciding how to manage grievance procedures and related policies…Title IX teams should keep an eye out for how their chosen policies work in practice and consider any needed changes as the school year progresses.” Read the article.

June 28, 2024

With New Title IX Regs Come New Cost Implications

Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

With the Aug. 1 implementation date fast approaching, the authors discussed potential increased costs associated with three areas of the new Title IX regulations: compliance requirements, the increased scope of applicability and grievance procedures. The revised regulations broaden the definition of sexual harassment and discrimination, remove barriers to reporting misconduct, and provide educational institutions with greater autonomy over their grievance procedures, including the option to revert to a single- investigator model and to choose whether to conduct live hearings. To ensure compliance with the new regulations by the Aug. 1 effective date, institutions can expect increased costs associated with updating their policies, procedures and training. While the authors recognize that these cost increases and compliance with the new regulations will affect schools differently depending on size and resources, schools can anticipate receiving more complaints and carrying out more investigations as a result of the broadened scope of Title IX applicability, both of which will require greater use of resources. Ultimately, individual schools can evaluate what procedures work best — both for the institution and the students. Read the article. Erica Whaley, candidate juris doctor at Roger Williams University School of Law and member of the firm’s 2024 summer associate class, contributed to the research, drafting and editing of the article.

June 3, 2024

Title IX coordinator: More than just a mandatory role

University Business

On the heels of recently released Title IX regulations, Kate and Sabrina identify how the role Title IX coordinator continues to ramp up as schools begin to implement the new regulations by August 1, 2024. All schools receiving federal financial assistance are required to designate at least one employee as their coordinator, with that person being “responsible for not only understanding Title IX’s evolving requirements but for ensuring the school’s compliance with them.” In addition, Title IX coordinators will be crucial in ensuring compliance in critical areas such as training of all employees about their obligations under the new regulations, policy drafting and grievance procedures. Read the article.

Legal Update: Department of Education Releases Issue Papers to Strengthen Program Integrity and Institutional Quality teaser
May 20, 2024

Legal Update: Department of Education Releases Issue Papers to Strengthen Program Integrity and Institutional Quality

Legal Update: The Department of Education Releases Significant Revisions to Title IX Regulations teaser
April 23, 2024

Legal Update: The Department of Education Releases Significant Revisions to Title IX Regulations



November 5, 2024

Where Are New Title IX Regulations Not Enforceable?

By August 1, 2024, educational institutions across the country were required to implement the Biden administration’s new regulations concerning Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which contained numerous expansions on the law’s protections. As anticipated, litigation followed, resulting in district courts issuing preliminary injunctions barring enforcement throughout the country. As of now, the 2024 regulations are enjoined from being enforced in nearly 26 states. While the litigations play out in due course, institutions in affected states will want to be on the lookout for any changes to these preliminary injunctions, and consider whether any state laws weigh into their consideration to amend their policies consistent with the new regulations. Read the article.

August 16, 2024

Schools Need To Consider These Seven Key Questions/New Title IX Compliance

BusinessWest

With the start of this new academic year, schools in jurisdictions not covered by a Federal injunction or listed here were required to comply with the new Title IX regulations by August 1, 2024. In their article, Kate and Sabrina share a list of top questions federally funded institutions are urged to have answers for. “[A]s institutions ensure compliance with the new regulations, it would not be surprising to see schools continue to revise policies based on how the new procedures pan out in practice,” Kate and Sabrina write. “This is especially true given that the new regulations give schools more autonomy in deciding how to manage grievance procedures and related policies…Title IX teams should keep an eye out for how their chosen policies work in practice and consider any needed changes as the school year progresses.” Read the article.

June 28, 2024

With New Title IX Regs Come New Cost Implications

Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

With the Aug. 1 implementation date fast approaching, the authors discussed potential increased costs associated with three areas of the new Title IX regulations: compliance requirements, the increased scope of applicability and grievance procedures. The revised regulations broaden the definition of sexual harassment and discrimination, remove barriers to reporting misconduct, and provide educational institutions with greater autonomy over their grievance procedures, including the option to revert to a single- investigator model and to choose whether to conduct live hearings. To ensure compliance with the new regulations by the Aug. 1 effective date, institutions can expect increased costs associated with updating their policies, procedures and training. While the authors recognize that these cost increases and compliance with the new regulations will affect schools differently depending on size and resources, schools can anticipate receiving more complaints and carrying out more investigations as a result of the broadened scope of Title IX applicability, both of which will require greater use of resources. Ultimately, individual schools can evaluate what procedures work best — both for the institution and the students. Read the article. Erica Whaley, candidate juris doctor at Roger Williams University School of Law and member of the firm’s 2024 summer associate class, contributed to the research, drafting and editing of the article.

June 3, 2024

Title IX coordinator: More than just a mandatory role

University Business

On the heels of recently released Title IX regulations, Kate and Sabrina identify how the role Title IX coordinator continues to ramp up as schools begin to implement the new regulations by August 1, 2024. All schools receiving federal financial assistance are required to designate at least one employee as their coordinator, with that person being “responsible for not only understanding Title IX’s evolving requirements but for ensuring the school’s compliance with them.” In addition, Title IX coordinators will be crucial in ensuring compliance in critical areas such as training of all employees about their obligations under the new regulations, policy drafting and grievance procedures. Read the article.

Legal Update: Department of Education Releases Issue Papers to Strengthen Program Integrity and Institutional Quality teaser
May 20, 2024

Legal Update: Department of Education Releases Issue Papers to Strengthen Program Integrity and Institutional Quality

Legal Update: The Department of Education Releases Significant Revisions to Title IX Regulations teaser
April 23, 2024

Legal Update: The Department of Education Releases Significant Revisions to Title IX Regulations


News


April 30, 2026

Kate Dion Named to 2026 “Women in Business” Class

Robinson+Cole Education industry team chair Kathleen Dion was selected by the Hartford Business Journal for inclusion in its 2026 “Women in Business” recognition. Kate was among 29 honorees chosen by a panel of independent judges for demonstrating exceptional business acumen, confidence in themselves and their organizations, and a strong track record of professional leadership. Kate was profiled in a special section of the Hartford Business Journal published on March 23, 2026, and was honored during the publication’s annual Women in Business Awards event on April 29. In her profile, she reflected on her most meaningful professional accomplishment—advising clients with strategic judgment that aligns legal risk management with business goals—along with her long‑term career goal of helping build a private‑practice environment where women are supported, mentored, and positioned for sustainable success. Kate also discussed navigating the path to partnership at Robinson+Cole as her most significant career challenge and highlighted her commitment to community service through her board roles with Hartford International University for Religion and Peace and Junior Achievement of Southwest New England. For over 20 years, the publication has honored the region's most talented women in leadership roles throughout central Connecticut with the Women in Business distinction.

Hartford Business Journal
Kate Dion Named to 2026 “Women in Business” Class teaser
December 4, 2025

Kate Dion Reappointed to Criminal Justice Act Standing Committee

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
November 25, 2025

Kathleen Dion and Kathryn Rattigan Spotlight Three AI-related Legal Issues Facing Higher Education Administrators

University Business
April 30, 2026

Kate Dion Named to 2026 “Women in Business” Class

Robinson+Cole Education industry team chair Kathleen Dion was selected by the Hartford Business Journal for inclusion in its 2026 “Women in Business” recognition. Kate was among 29 honorees chosen by a panel of independent judges for demonstrating exceptional business acumen, confidence in themselves and their organizations, and a strong track record of professional leadership. Kate was profiled in a special section of the Hartford Business Journal published on March 23, 2026, and was honored during the publication’s annual Women in Business Awards event on April 29. In her profile, she reflected on her most meaningful professional accomplishment—advising clients with strategic judgment that aligns legal risk management with business goals—along with her long‑term career goal of helping build a private‑practice environment where women are supported, mentored, and positioned for sustainable success. Kate also discussed navigating the path to partnership at Robinson+Cole as her most significant career challenge and highlighted her commitment to community service through her board roles with Hartford International University for Religion and Peace and Junior Achievement of Southwest New England. For over 20 years, the publication has honored the region's most talented women in leadership roles throughout central Connecticut with the Women in Business distinction.

Hartford Business Journal
Kate Dion Named to 2026 “Women in Business” Class teaser
December 4, 2025

Kate Dion Reappointed to Criminal Justice Act Standing Committee

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
November 25, 2025

Kathleen Dion and Kathryn Rattigan Spotlight Three AI-related Legal Issues Facing Higher Education Administrators

University Business
November 14, 2025

Kate Dion Receives Dean’s Alumni Excellence Award

Western New England 2025 Law Alumni Awards
Kate Dion Receives Dean’s Alumni Excellence Award teaser
November 6, 2025

Robinson+Cole Commends 62 Attorneys Recognized in 2025 Super Lawyers®

Recognition spans key regions and highlights the firm’s seasoned practitioners and emerging leaders in many business transactions and litigation practices
Robinson+Cole Commends 62 Attorneys Recognized in 2025 <i>Super Lawyers</i>® teaser
June 5, 2025

Robinson+Cole Secures 45 Total Rankings in Chambers USA 2025 Guide

Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business
Robinson+Cole Secures 45 Total Rankings in <i>Chambers USA 2025</i> Guide teaser
February 14, 2025

Kate Dion and Kathryn Rattigan Co-Author Article on Artificial Intelligence Compliance and Governance in Higher Education

University Business
November 20, 2024

Robinson+Cole Participates in Annual Junior Achievement Program at Parkville Elementary School

Robinson+Cole Participates in Annual Junior Achievement Program at Parkville Elementary School teaser
November 5, 2024

Kate Dion and Sabrina Galli Co-Author BusinessWest Article On The Enforceability of New Title IX Regulations

BusinessWest

November 14, 2025

Kate Dion Receives Dean’s Alumni Excellence Award

Western New England 2025 Law Alumni Awards
Kate Dion Receives Dean’s Alumni Excellence Award teaser
November 6, 2025

Robinson+Cole Commends 62 Attorneys Recognized in 2025 Super Lawyers®

Recognition spans key regions and highlights the firm’s seasoned practitioners and emerging leaders in many business transactions and litigation practices
Robinson+Cole Commends 62 Attorneys Recognized in 2025 <i>Super Lawyers</i>® teaser
June 5, 2025

Robinson+Cole Secures 45 Total Rankings in Chambers USA 2025 Guide

Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business
Robinson+Cole Secures 45 Total Rankings in <i>Chambers USA 2025</i> Guide teaser
February 14, 2025

Kate Dion and Kathryn Rattigan Co-Author Article on Artificial Intelligence Compliance and Governance in Higher Education

University Business
November 20, 2024

Robinson+Cole Participates in Annual Junior Achievement Program at Parkville Elementary School

Robinson+Cole Participates in Annual Junior Achievement Program at Parkville Elementary School teaser
November 5, 2024

Kate Dion and Sabrina Galli Co-Author BusinessWest Article On The Enforceability of New Title IX Regulations

BusinessWest

Events


Past

One Big Beautiful Bill

Mar 19 2026
Boston Bar Association 2026 Higher Education Conference
Past

Equity in Education: University Policies Through a Legal Lens

Nov 18 2025
The Knowledge Group Live CLE Webinar
Past

One Big Beautiful Bill

Mar 19 2026
Boston Bar Association 2026 Higher Education Conference
Past

Equity in Education: University Policies Through a Legal Lens

Nov 18 2025
The Knowledge Group Live CLE Webinar
Past

2025 WNE Law Alumni Awards

Nov 14 2025
Western New England University
Past

Equity in Education: University Policies Through a Legal Lens

Oct 16 2025
The Knowledge Group Live CLE Webinar
Past

Creating an Effective AI Compliance Program for Your Campus

Nov 15 2024
2024 CCIC Annual Member Forum "Partnering for Progress"
Past

Title IX: What You Need to Know About the Final Regulations

Apr 29 2024
R+C-Hosted Webinar
Past

2025 WNE Law Alumni Awards

Nov 14 2025
Western New England University
Past

Equity in Education: University Policies Through a Legal Lens

Oct 16 2025
The Knowledge Group Live CLE Webinar
Past

Creating an Effective AI Compliance Program for Your Campus

Nov 15 2024
2024 CCIC Annual Member Forum "Partnering for Progress"
Past

Title IX: What You Need to Know About the Final Regulations

Apr 29 2024
R+C-Hosted Webinar

Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider


Below is an excerpt of Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider blog posts authored by Kathleen.

Cyber Criminals Hone Attacks Against Schools

The FBI recently issued a Flash Alert warning higher education institutions, K-12 schools, and seminaries about increasing numbers of ransomware attacks affecting the education industry. According to the warning, “Since March 2020, the FBI has become aware of PYSA ransomware attacks against US and foreign government entities, educational institutions, private companies, and the healthcare sector... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Dealing with Two Schoolyard Bullies: Schools Are Forced to Contend with Cyber-attacks While Also Trying to Manage Covid-19 Crisis

Criminals are apparently not taking any time off during this pandemic, and in fact by all accounts have increased their attacks, particularly targeting entities whose attention is diverted to dealing with the fallout of the Covid-19 crisis. In particular, educational institutions across the country have faced a recent onslaught of ransomware attacks, often crippling an... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

FERPA and COVID-19 Virus DOE Guidelines

The COVID-19 virus is having an unprecedented effect on all aspects of our daily lives, and has hit the educational system especially hard with forced closures and cancellations.  Because educational institutions play such a vital role in our communities, the Department of Education (DOE) recently issued guidance in the form of Frequently Asked Questions (Guidance)... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

States Struggle with Regulating Risks Associated with College Closures

Based on an unprecedented number of college closures, along with complex demographic challenges showing continued reductions in the number of college-aged students, states are struggling to determine how to best protect both students and college employees. Currently, most states have been reactive, and have only taken action after a college has announced its intention to... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Has Investigative Genealogy Become the Wild, Wild West?

DNA technology has assisted law enforcement in identifying criminals for decades.  The U.S. National DNA Database System stores the DNA data of millions of criminals, and allows law enforcement officers around the country to compare and match forensic evidence in this central repository.  This closed universe of DNA only contains data from individuals arrested or convicted of a... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Fourth Circuit Expands Title IX Liability for Harassment Through Anonymous Online Posts

The Fourth Circuit recently held that universities could be liable for Title IX violations if they fail to adequately respond to harassment that occurs through anonymous-messaging apps. The case, Feminist Majority Foundation v. Hurley, concerned messages sent through the now-defunct app Yik Yak to the individual plaintiffs, who were students at the University of Mary... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Smile and Say “Cheese” — When is a Photo an Educational Record under FERPA?

As the myriad of Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act  (FERPA) interpretation issues continues to cloud many educators’ understanding of what is permissible and not permissible under the statute, some assistance was recently provided by the U.S. Department of Education. The Family Policy Compliance Office (FPCO) advises that as with any other “education record,” a photo or video of a student... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

EDUCAUSE Challenges the US DOE’s Guidance on Data Breach Reporting

On January 30, 2018, EDUCAUSE, a higher education technology association, submitted a letter to the U.S. Department of Education describing concerns that it had with the Federal Student Aid (“FSA”) ability to protect federal student financial aid data. EDUCAUSE’s members include IT professionals from over 1,800 colleges and universities as well as other organizations. First,... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

US Supreme Court Evaluates Privacy of Cell Phone Data

Last Thursday, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Carpenter v. United States.  At issue was whether the FBI violated the Fourth Amendment when it obtained the cellphone location records of Timothy Carpenter.  The FBI used these records to establish Mr. Carpenter’s whereabouts during time periods in which certain armed robberies occurred.  The government... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Empowerment or Intrusion? The College Transparency Act of 2017

Stating the obvious, college is one of the most important and expensive investments Americans make. In addition to tuition costs, from a consumer perspective, other factors should be important in deciding on a college, including graduate employment prospects, average student loan debt, and average number of semesters taken to complete a degree. If you were... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

State of Connecticut Provides Guidance on Changes to Education Records of Transgender Students

The Connecticut State Department of Education (DOE) recently published guidance on implementing civil rights protections for transgender students. The guidance, in part, provides information on issues related to requests that a school change a student’s education records to be consistent with their chosen name and gender identity. Notably, the guidance recognized tension that may arise... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Southern Oregon University Victim of Phishing Scheme

Last month, Southern Oregon University (SOU) announced that it was the victim of a $1.9 million phishing scheme. SOU received an email purportedly from their contractor, Anderson Construction, requesting the April payment for construction on the McNeal Pavilion and Student Recreation Center. An employee then sent funds to a bank account that the contractor did... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Illinois Court Rules That College Foundation Documents Subject to FOIA

On May 9, 2017, the Illinois Appellate Court held that the College of DuPage Foundation (Foundation), a fundraising organization for the public College of DuPage (College), is subject to the state’s open records law. In doing so, the Court rejected the Foundation’s argument that it was a charitable organization with no public role, and instead... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

EFF Report Finds That Student Data is Not Adequately Protected By Ed Tech Companies

On April 13, 2017, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) published Spying on Students, a report detailing its investigation into school-issued devices and student privacy. EFF found that parents were overwhelmingly not informed about what educational technology (Ed Tech) their students were using. As a result, students and/or parents were the ones burdened with investigating what... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

IRS to Notify 100,000 Taxpayers That Their Information May Have Been Obtained Through Misuse of FAFSA Retrieval Tool

On Thursday, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Commissioner John Koskinen testified that the personal data of up to a 100,000 taxpayers could have been compromised as a result of criminal use of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid Data Retrieval Tool (“DRT”). Last week, we posted that the IRS disabled the tool after it suspected... Continue Reading

Visit Blog