Robinson Cole LLP
High Contrast Mode

Peter H. Struzzi has represented and advised hospitals, health systems and other health care entities on a variety of health law and business issues over his more than 30-year career. His practice focuses on health care-related contractual, transactional and regulatory matters. Prior to joining our firm, Peter served as Vice President and General Counsel of a hospital and health system in Connecticut. He is a member of our firm’s Health Law group.

Transactional

Peter has represented and counseled health care providers on transactional matters, including physician practice acquisitions, affiliation agreements, professional service agreements, co-management arrangements, physician employment and service agreements, equipment purchase and lease agreements, space lease arrangements, and grant agreements.

Regulatory

Peter has advised health care providers on federal healthcare laws and regulations, including the Stark law, the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA); Connecticut healthcare laws and regulations, including certificate of need matters and state reporting requirements; medical staff matters, including medical staff bylaws, hearings and peer review; and physician recruitment and compensation. He also has advised health care providers and other entities on corporate governance and corporate compliance, including internal investigations and providing education to stakeholders regarding regulatory and compliance responsibilities.

Pro Bono + Community Involvement

Peter has served on the Board of Directors of Bridge House, Inc. for more than 10 years, and as President of its Board since September 2018. Located in Bridgeport, Connecticut and accredited by Clubhouse International, Bridge House, Inc. provides resources and programs to empower adults living with persistent mental illness to improve their quality of life.

Peter has taught a course in Advanced Business Law at the Jack Welch College of Business and Technology at Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, Connecticut.

  • University of Pennsylvania School of Law (Juris Doctor)
    • Articles Editor, Journal of Comparative Business and Capital Markets Law
    • Instructor, Arthur.D.Littleton Legal Writing
  • Williams College (Bachelors, magna cum laude)
    • B.A.
    • Phi Beta Kappa

  • State of Connecticut
  • State of New York

Bridge House, Inc.
President, Board of Directors

Publications


Health Law Diagnosis teaser
November 30, 2022

Health Law Diagnosis

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
October 31, 2022

Health Law Diagnosis

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
September 28, 2022

Health Law Diagnosis

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
November 30, 2022

Health Law Diagnosis

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
October 31, 2022

Health Law Diagnosis

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
September 28, 2022

Health Law Diagnosis

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
March 25, 2022

Health Law Diagnosis

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
December 15, 2020

Health Law Diagnosis

November 3, 2020

The benefit of COVID-19 waivers to Stark Law, anti-kickback statute

Medical Economics

In response to the COVID-19 public health emergency, the federal government has issued a series of regulatory waivers and guidelines relaxing the applicability of otherwise stringent fraud and abuse laws, including the physician self-referral (Stark) law, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. The pandemic waivers afford providers an opportunity to demonstrate that these fraud and abuse laws are inhibiting beneficial arrangements and can be changed without significant risk to the public fisc; but fraudulent schemes that seek cover under the waivers could spoil things for everyone. In the article, Conor and Peter review the current waivers and guidelines in place, the types of arrangements they are intended to protect, and whether there may be unintended consequences that prevent the waivers from laying the foundation for long-term change. View the article.

August 13, 2020

COVID-19 pandemic brings telehealth into U.S. homes

Medical Economics

The article provides a high-level overview of the systemic changes throughout the nation’s health care system that have resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic, highlights key issues for health care providers to monitor as federal and state governments, physicians and patients continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic, and considers how the post-COVID-19 health care landscape will look for telehealth services. View the article.

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
July 13, 2020

Health Law Diagnosis

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
June 11, 2020

Health Law Diagnosis



Health Law Diagnosis teaser
March 25, 2022

Health Law Diagnosis

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
December 15, 2020

Health Law Diagnosis

November 3, 2020

The benefit of COVID-19 waivers to Stark Law, anti-kickback statute

Medical Economics

In response to the COVID-19 public health emergency, the federal government has issued a series of regulatory waivers and guidelines relaxing the applicability of otherwise stringent fraud and abuse laws, including the physician self-referral (Stark) law, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. The pandemic waivers afford providers an opportunity to demonstrate that these fraud and abuse laws are inhibiting beneficial arrangements and can be changed without significant risk to the public fisc; but fraudulent schemes that seek cover under the waivers could spoil things for everyone. In the article, Conor and Peter review the current waivers and guidelines in place, the types of arrangements they are intended to protect, and whether there may be unintended consequences that prevent the waivers from laying the foundation for long-term change. View the article.

August 13, 2020

COVID-19 pandemic brings telehealth into U.S. homes

Medical Economics

The article provides a high-level overview of the systemic changes throughout the nation’s health care system that have resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic, highlights key issues for health care providers to monitor as federal and state governments, physicians and patients continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic, and considers how the post-COVID-19 health care landscape will look for telehealth services. View the article.

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
July 13, 2020

Health Law Diagnosis

Health Law Diagnosis teaser
June 11, 2020

Health Law Diagnosis


News


November 4, 2020

Conor Duffy and Peter Struzzi Author Article on Published in Medical Economics

Health Law Group lawyers Conor O. Duffy and Peter H. Struzzi authored the article “The benefit of COVID-19 waivers to Stark Law, anti-kickback statute” published in Medical Economics on November 3, 2020. In response to the COVID-19 public health emergency, the federal government has issued a series of regulatory waivers and guidelines relaxing the applicability of otherwise stringent fraud and abuse laws, including the physician self-referral (Stark) law, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. The pandemic waivers afford providers an opportunity to demonstrate that these fraud and abuse laws are inhibiting beneficial arrangements and can be changed without significant risk to the public fisc; but fraudulent schemes that seek cover under the waivers could spoil things for everyone. In the article, Conor and Peter review the current waivers and guidelines in place, the types of arrangements they are intended to protect, and whether there may be unintended consequences that prevent the waivers from laying the foundation for long-term change. Read the full article.

Medical Economics
August 14, 2020

Conor Duffy and Peter Struzzi Author Article on Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic Published in Medical Economics

Medical Economics
November 4, 2020

Conor Duffy and Peter Struzzi Author Article on Published in Medical Economics

Health Law Group lawyers Conor O. Duffy and Peter H. Struzzi authored the article “The benefit of COVID-19 waivers to Stark Law, anti-kickback statute” published in Medical Economics on November 3, 2020. In response to the COVID-19 public health emergency, the federal government has issued a series of regulatory waivers and guidelines relaxing the applicability of otherwise stringent fraud and abuse laws, including the physician self-referral (Stark) law, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. The pandemic waivers afford providers an opportunity to demonstrate that these fraud and abuse laws are inhibiting beneficial arrangements and can be changed without significant risk to the public fisc; but fraudulent schemes that seek cover under the waivers could spoil things for everyone. In the article, Conor and Peter review the current waivers and guidelines in place, the types of arrangements they are intended to protect, and whether there may be unintended consequences that prevent the waivers from laying the foundation for long-term change. Read the full article.

Medical Economics
August 14, 2020

Conor Duffy and Peter Struzzi Author Article on Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic Published in Medical Economics

Medical Economics