Robinson Cole LLP
High Contrast Mode

Peter R. Knight focuses on litigation, defense of agency enforcement actions, and regulatory matters. He regularly assists clients with private cost recovery and complex multiparty Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLA cases, as well as environmental remediation projects. He also represents a variety of coastal and maritime interests in connection with large vessel casualties, oil spills and emergency response, criminal enforcement, and counseling on US Coast Guard regulatory matters. 

Environmental Litigation + Enforcement

Peter has represented clients in complex environmental litigation matters across the United States. These claims typically are brought under a variety of federal and state statutes, including CERCLA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. He has represented Fortune 500 companies in connection with the defense and prosecution of CERCLA cost recovery and contribution claims, including claims brought against the United States in connection with historical wartime operations. Peter's experience defending agency enforcement matters includes civil and criminal enforcement actions involving both land-based facilities and commercial shipping interests. A number of his maritime matters have involved major vessel casualties, including open water and coastal oil spills as well as container ship fires and explosions. His class action experience includes environmental and toxic tort matters, as well as consumer products and false labeling cases.

Environmental Counseling

Peter represents and manages the interests of large and small Potentially Responsible Parties at a number of Superfund sites across the country. He has both negotiated settlements and managed multiparty cases to resolution. He regularly works with clients on all manner of environmental legacy issues involving indemnity claims, historical liabilities, and remediation obligations. Peter also has advised companies on developing and implementing corporate compliance programs and environmental management systems.

Government Investigations

Peter represents companies and individuals in a variety of government investigations involving environmental and maritime matters. In these cases, which have spanned jurisdictions across the country, he typically works with the Environmental Crimes Section of the Department of Justice. Many of Peter's maritime matters have involved Coast Guard investigations and U.S. prosecution of claimed oil dumping by commercial shipping companies.

Pro Bono

Peter is a past chair of our firm’s Pro Bono Committee. His own pro bono efforts focus on representing children in neglect and abuse cases through the firm’s long-standing relationship with Lawyers for Children America (LFCA). Based on his many years of service to LFCA, the Connecticut Bar Association honored him with its Anthony V. DeMayo Pro Bono Award in 2016. Peter was also part of a team of firm attorneys involved in a pro bono project to combat poaching and illegal wildlife trafficking in Namibia, Myanmar, and Laos by strengthening the country’s legislative framework.

Peter has written and presented on a number of topics related to environmental enforcement, environmental regulation of commercial shipping, environmental disclosures, and climate change litigation.  

  • University of Connecticut School of Law (Juris Doctor, with honors)
    • Connecticut Journal of International Law
  • Wesleyan University (Bachelors)
    • B.A., English

  • State of Connecticut
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut

Lawyers for Children America (LFCA) “Advocate Hero,” 2025

Robinson+Cole Pro Bono Award, 2024

Lawyers for Children America Pro Bono Service Honoree, 2019

Connecticut Bar Association's Anthony V. DeMayo Pro Bono Award recipient, 2016

Robinson+Cole Pro Bono Service Award Recipient, 2014

University of Connecticut School of Law
Adjunct Professor

Lawyers for Children America
Co, chair, LFCA Advocates Network
Pro Bono Volunteer

Connecticut Forest and Park Association
Board of Directors
Chair, Governance Committee

Connecticut Legal Services, Inc.
Board of Directors

Legal Food Hub
Attorney Council

Experience


Environmental Litigation: Environmental Class Action Jury Trial

Represented transportation company in defense of an environmental class action jury trial in Massachusetts state court, one of the very few class action trials resulting from an environmental incident, and, to our knowledge, the first environmental class action ever tried in Massachusetts. The case involved claims for property damage resulting from an oil spill in Buzzards Bay. The class was made up of approximately 1,000 residents from the Town of Mattapoisett who alleged their shoreline property was oiled as a result of the spill. The trial, which lasted two weeks, addressed the claims of eight individual class members. The jury ultimately awarded a very favorable result for the client. The results of these initial cases provided the parties with a basis to resolve the remaining claims.

Read More

Environmental Litigation: CERCLA Cost Recovery Claim

Represented nuclear fuel manufacturer in Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLA cost recovery claim against the United States. The facility was contaminated with highly enriched uranium as a result of contract work performed for the U.S. Navy in connection with the development of the nuclear submarine program. Our client recovered a substantial portion of its multi-million dollar site remediation costs from the Government. The cleanup was conducted under the auspices of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Read More

Environmental Litigation: Multiparty CERCLA Cost Recovery Action

Represented former nuclear fuel manufacturer based in Illinois in multiparty CERCLA cost recovery action brought by current facility owner against former operators and arrangers, including the United States. Current owner conducted multimillion dollar site remediation and site closure to address a legacy of radiological contamination.

Read More


Publications


May 8, 2025

States Sue Trump Administration Over Blocked Wind Developments

Environmental Law+ Blog

On Monday, May 4, 2025, a coalition of 17 states and the District of Columbia filed suit in Massachusetts District Court over the Trump administration’s efforts to block federal permits for all offshore wind development. The administration’s policy was announced in a January 20, 2025 executive order placing federal permitting of wind projects on hold while the Interior Department reviews applications for offshore leases. The lawsuit asks the court to declare the executive order unlawful and to prevent federal agencies from taking any measures to block or delay wind projects, claiming the it is baseless and unjustified. Several offshore wind projects are under development, having advanced through the long list of environmental reviews required by federal law, while others are in the regulatory pipeline. The plaintiffs note that the executive order contradicts the administration’s simultaneous declaration of a “national energy emergency,” and undermines efforts by the affected plaintiffs to comply with their renewable energy requirements. Notwithstanding the executive order, the offshore wind industry has faced economic headwinds in recent years that have resulted in delays, additional costs, and, in some cases, project cancelations. As a result of economic uncertainty and political hostility, the status of offshore wind projects varies widely – Atlantic Shores (1.5GW) off the coast of New Jersey recently had its air pollution permit invalidated by the EPA; Empire Wind (810MW) off the coast of New York is under a stop order issued by the Interior Department; Beacon Wind (2.5GW) off the coast of New York withdrew a key permit application, citing the need to reevaluate the project design; Vineyard Wind 1 (800MW) off the coast of Massachusetts is on track to complete construction in 2025; New England Wind 1 and 2 (2.6GW) off the coast of Massachusetts is fending off lawsuits to reopen its Clean Air Act permits; Southcoast Wind (2.4GW) off the coast of Massachusetts has announced a construction delay; and Revolution Wind (704MW) off the coast of Rhode Island is progressing. The jurisdictions involved in the lawsuit are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington. Visit our Environmental Law+ blog. 

June 25, 2024

How Justices’ Chevron Ruling May Influence Wind Projects

Law360

The article covers recent challenges to offshore wind projects, and how an anticipated ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court may upend long-standing principles of deference to federal agency decision making. “The court’s decision could influence the agencies’ rulemaking process, how agencies interpret their statutory authority, and the deference that courts apply to those interpretations,” they write. “While the statutes and regulations governing the approval process for offshore wind projects will remain constant, at least for the time being, the federal courts’ framework for reviewing agencies’ decision making based on those rules could be subject to upheaval.” Read the article.

Legal Update: First Circuit Rejects Challenges to Federal Permits for Vineyard Wind 1 teaser
May 21, 2024

Legal Update: First Circuit Rejects Challenges to Federal Permits for Vineyard Wind 1

May 8, 2025

States Sue Trump Administration Over Blocked Wind Developments

Environmental Law+ Blog

On Monday, May 4, 2025, a coalition of 17 states and the District of Columbia filed suit in Massachusetts District Court over the Trump administration’s efforts to block federal permits for all offshore wind development. The administration’s policy was announced in a January 20, 2025 executive order placing federal permitting of wind projects on hold while the Interior Department reviews applications for offshore leases. The lawsuit asks the court to declare the executive order unlawful and to prevent federal agencies from taking any measures to block or delay wind projects, claiming the it is baseless and unjustified. Several offshore wind projects are under development, having advanced through the long list of environmental reviews required by federal law, while others are in the regulatory pipeline. The plaintiffs note that the executive order contradicts the administration’s simultaneous declaration of a “national energy emergency,” and undermines efforts by the affected plaintiffs to comply with their renewable energy requirements. Notwithstanding the executive order, the offshore wind industry has faced economic headwinds in recent years that have resulted in delays, additional costs, and, in some cases, project cancelations. As a result of economic uncertainty and political hostility, the status of offshore wind projects varies widely – Atlantic Shores (1.5GW) off the coast of New Jersey recently had its air pollution permit invalidated by the EPA; Empire Wind (810MW) off the coast of New York is under a stop order issued by the Interior Department; Beacon Wind (2.5GW) off the coast of New York withdrew a key permit application, citing the need to reevaluate the project design; Vineyard Wind 1 (800MW) off the coast of Massachusetts is on track to complete construction in 2025; New England Wind 1 and 2 (2.6GW) off the coast of Massachusetts is fending off lawsuits to reopen its Clean Air Act permits; Southcoast Wind (2.4GW) off the coast of Massachusetts has announced a construction delay; and Revolution Wind (704MW) off the coast of Rhode Island is progressing. The jurisdictions involved in the lawsuit are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington. Visit our Environmental Law+ blog. 

June 25, 2024

How Justices’ Chevron Ruling May Influence Wind Projects

Law360

The article covers recent challenges to offshore wind projects, and how an anticipated ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court may upend long-standing principles of deference to federal agency decision making. “The court’s decision could influence the agencies’ rulemaking process, how agencies interpret their statutory authority, and the deference that courts apply to those interpretations,” they write. “While the statutes and regulations governing the approval process for offshore wind projects will remain constant, at least for the time being, the federal courts’ framework for reviewing agencies’ decision making based on those rules could be subject to upheaval.” Read the article.

Legal Update: First Circuit Rejects Challenges to Federal Permits for Vineyard Wind 1 teaser
May 21, 2024

Legal Update: First Circuit Rejects Challenges to Federal Permits for Vineyard Wind 1

December 7, 2023

Tidal Changes in U.S. Offshore Wind Development

The Maritime Executive

The article covers offshore wind developments impacting the Biden administration’s renewable energy goals, including recent regional developments in Connecticut and constraints facing the offshore wind industry in the northeast. Facing obstacles has slowed development, but they provide an optimistic perspective moving forward, writing, Despite these setbacks, state governments continue to explore OSW development and ways to alleviate some of the economic and logistical hurdles standing in the way of progress. View the article.

May 27, 2021

COVID-19 and its Impact on the OSHA Inspection Process

ISHN (Industrial Safety & Hygiene News)

Taking into consideration how COVID-19 has brought significant changes to OSHA’s inspection and enforcement focus, the article offers best practices for managing facility inspections, both generally and with specific references to COVID considerations. Read the article.

April 19, 2021

Combustible Dust and OSHA Inspections

EHS Today

The article focuses on OSHA’s Combustible Dust National Emphasis Program, which continues to be an area of focus and enforcement. While OSHA does not have its own combustible dust standard, the Administration has said it will rely on the General Duty Clause and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards for enforcement. Guidelines to prepare for and handle OSHA inspections are in some cases universal, but when combustible dust may be a factor, there are some unique considerations for employers to be mindful of. Megan, Chris, Peter and Jon cover the actions employers can take before, during, and after an inspection to mitigate the potential for a citation. Read the full article.

March 2021

Avoiding Dust- Ups with OSHA over NFPA 652 Compliance

ISHN (Industrial Safety & Hygiene News)

The article offers an update on OSHA's Combustible Dust National Emphasis Program, which was launched in 2008 and continues to be an area of focus and enforcement. "While no OSHA standard directly addresses combustible dust, this has not hindered OSHA enforcement. Instead, OSHA has relied on the General Duty Clause and reference to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards when citing employers for combustible dust hazards." Under NFPA 652 facilities were required to complete an initial dust hazard analysis by September 7, 2020. Megan, Chris, Peter and Jon also briefly cover the applicable NFPA standards and OSHA’s compliance guidance. Read the full article.

February 10, 2021

Breaking the chain of “substantial continuity” — Tenth Circuit clarifies test for repeat OSHA violations

ISHN (Industrial Safety & Hygiene News)

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Sec’y of Labor v. Wynnewood Refining Co. recently evaluated the applicability of the substantial continuity test in connection with an OSHA citation that included several repeat violations. The article offers background on the important role that repeat violations play in OSHA citations, how the substantial continuity test has been applied in determining whether a current company should be held liable for repeat citations based on citations from a prior company, and how the Tenth Circuit addressed that question in Wynnewood Refining. Read the full article.

January 7, 2021

COVID-19 and OSHA: Where we started and where we are now

ISHN (Industrial Safety & Hygiene News)

The article gives a brief summary of OSHA’s response to COVID-19 to date and where enforcement measures currently stand. The piece also examines COVID-19 enforcement trends and offers some insight on changes and challenges for employers in 2021. Read the full article.



December 7, 2023

Tidal Changes in U.S. Offshore Wind Development

The Maritime Executive

The article covers offshore wind developments impacting the Biden administration’s renewable energy goals, including recent regional developments in Connecticut and constraints facing the offshore wind industry in the northeast. Facing obstacles has slowed development, but they provide an optimistic perspective moving forward, writing, Despite these setbacks, state governments continue to explore OSW development and ways to alleviate some of the economic and logistical hurdles standing in the way of progress. View the article.

May 27, 2021

COVID-19 and its Impact on the OSHA Inspection Process

ISHN (Industrial Safety & Hygiene News)

Taking into consideration how COVID-19 has brought significant changes to OSHA’s inspection and enforcement focus, the article offers best practices for managing facility inspections, both generally and with specific references to COVID considerations. Read the article.

April 19, 2021

Combustible Dust and OSHA Inspections

EHS Today

The article focuses on OSHA’s Combustible Dust National Emphasis Program, which continues to be an area of focus and enforcement. While OSHA does not have its own combustible dust standard, the Administration has said it will rely on the General Duty Clause and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards for enforcement. Guidelines to prepare for and handle OSHA inspections are in some cases universal, but when combustible dust may be a factor, there are some unique considerations for employers to be mindful of. Megan, Chris, Peter and Jon cover the actions employers can take before, during, and after an inspection to mitigate the potential for a citation. Read the full article.

March 2021

Avoiding Dust- Ups with OSHA over NFPA 652 Compliance

ISHN (Industrial Safety & Hygiene News)

The article offers an update on OSHA's Combustible Dust National Emphasis Program, which was launched in 2008 and continues to be an area of focus and enforcement. "While no OSHA standard directly addresses combustible dust, this has not hindered OSHA enforcement. Instead, OSHA has relied on the General Duty Clause and reference to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards when citing employers for combustible dust hazards." Under NFPA 652 facilities were required to complete an initial dust hazard analysis by September 7, 2020. Megan, Chris, Peter and Jon also briefly cover the applicable NFPA standards and OSHA’s compliance guidance. Read the full article.

February 10, 2021

Breaking the chain of “substantial continuity” — Tenth Circuit clarifies test for repeat OSHA violations

ISHN (Industrial Safety & Hygiene News)

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Sec’y of Labor v. Wynnewood Refining Co. recently evaluated the applicability of the substantial continuity test in connection with an OSHA citation that included several repeat violations. The article offers background on the important role that repeat violations play in OSHA citations, how the substantial continuity test has been applied in determining whether a current company should be held liable for repeat citations based on citations from a prior company, and how the Tenth Circuit addressed that question in Wynnewood Refining. Read the full article.

January 7, 2021

COVID-19 and OSHA: Where we started and where we are now

ISHN (Industrial Safety & Hygiene News)

The article gives a brief summary of OSHA’s response to COVID-19 to date and where enforcement measures currently stand. The piece also examines COVID-19 enforcement trends and offers some insight on changes and challenges for employers in 2021. Read the full article.


News


March 31, 2026

Bankruptcy + Reorganization Group Wins “Ch. 11 Reorganization of the Year” & “Restructuring of the Year”

Robinson+Cole’s Bankruptcy + Reorganization group received the “Ch. 11 Reorganization of the Year” and the “Restructuring of the Year” awards under the 50MM to $100MM category for their restructuring work of Presperse Corporation and SWC at The M&A Advisor’s 20th Annual Turnaround Awards. The awards are meticulously chosen by a panel of peers, which recognizes individuals and firms for their demonstrated excellence in distressed investing and restructuring matters. R+C is also pleased to be a sponsor of the awards ceremony. Robinson+Cole played a pivotal role as counsel to the Tort Claimant's Committee in the landmark Chapter 11 case involving Presperse. The matter was led by group partners Mark Fink and Natalie Ramsey, with support from Laurie Krepto, Peter Knight, and Jenna Scoville. Robinson+Cole also represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in In re SWC Industries LLC, securing a favorable settlement that delivered significant additional recovery and a strong liquidation plan for unsecured creditors. The matter was also led by group co-chair Natalie Ramsey with support from Jamie Edmonson, Rachel Jaffe Mauceri, Evan Lazerowitz, Laurie Krepto, and Rick Willi.

The M&A Advisor
Bankruptcy + Reorganization Group Wins “Ch. 11 Reorganization of the Year” & “Restructuring of the Year” teaser
November 10, 2025

Bankruptcy + Reorganizations Group Leads First-Ever Talc Bankruptcy Confirmed with Section 524(g) Injunction

February 11, 2025

Peter Knight Quoted in Hartford Business Journal Article on Jones Act’s Impact on New England’s Energy Costs

Hartford Business Journal
March 31, 2026

Bankruptcy + Reorganization Group Wins “Ch. 11 Reorganization of the Year” & “Restructuring of the Year”

Robinson+Cole’s Bankruptcy + Reorganization group received the “Ch. 11 Reorganization of the Year” and the “Restructuring of the Year” awards under the 50MM to $100MM category for their restructuring work of Presperse Corporation and SWC at The M&A Advisor’s 20th Annual Turnaround Awards. The awards are meticulously chosen by a panel of peers, which recognizes individuals and firms for their demonstrated excellence in distressed investing and restructuring matters. R+C is also pleased to be a sponsor of the awards ceremony. Robinson+Cole played a pivotal role as counsel to the Tort Claimant's Committee in the landmark Chapter 11 case involving Presperse. The matter was led by group partners Mark Fink and Natalie Ramsey, with support from Laurie Krepto, Peter Knight, and Jenna Scoville. Robinson+Cole also represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in In re SWC Industries LLC, securing a favorable settlement that delivered significant additional recovery and a strong liquidation plan for unsecured creditors. The matter was also led by group co-chair Natalie Ramsey with support from Jamie Edmonson, Rachel Jaffe Mauceri, Evan Lazerowitz, Laurie Krepto, and Rick Willi.

The M&A Advisor
Bankruptcy + Reorganization Group Wins “Ch. 11 Reorganization of the Year” & “Restructuring of the Year” teaser
November 10, 2025

Bankruptcy + Reorganizations Group Leads First-Ever Talc Bankruptcy Confirmed with Section 524(g) Injunction

February 11, 2025

Peter Knight Quoted in Hartford Business Journal Article on Jones Act’s Impact on New England’s Energy Costs

Hartford Business Journal
November 8, 2024

Peter Knight and Robinson+Cole Recognized at Lawyers for Children America’s “Champions for Children” Celebration

Peter Knight and Robinson+Cole Recognized at Lawyers for Children America’s “Champions for Children” Celebration teaser
August 1, 2024

Robinson+Cole Presents 2024 Awards

June 26, 2024

Peter Knight, John Casey, and Eden Yerby Co-Author Law360 Article on How SCOTUS Rulings May Impact Wind Projects

Law360
March 1, 2024

Peter Knight Named Co-Chair of Lawyers for Children America Advocate Network

Lawyers for Children America
December 20, 2023

Peter Knight, Jess Bardi, and Eden Yerby Author Article on “Tidal Changes in U.S. Offshore Wind Development” in The Maritime Executive

The Maritime Executive
November 3, 2023

Peter Knight Accepts Invitation to Join Legal Food Hub’s First Attorney Council


November 8, 2024

Peter Knight and Robinson+Cole Recognized at Lawyers for Children America’s “Champions for Children” Celebration

Peter Knight and Robinson+Cole Recognized at Lawyers for Children America’s “Champions for Children” Celebration teaser
August 1, 2024

Robinson+Cole Presents 2024 Awards

June 26, 2024

Peter Knight, John Casey, and Eden Yerby Co-Author Law360 Article on How SCOTUS Rulings May Impact Wind Projects

Law360
March 1, 2024

Peter Knight Named Co-Chair of Lawyers for Children America Advocate Network

Lawyers for Children America
December 20, 2023

Peter Knight, Jess Bardi, and Eden Yerby Author Article on “Tidal Changes in U.S. Offshore Wind Development” in The Maritime Executive

The Maritime Executive
November 3, 2023

Peter Knight Accepts Invitation to Join Legal Food Hub’s First Attorney Council


Events


Past

Lawyers for Children America "Champions for Children: Celebrating 30 Years of Protecting Children and Partnering for Change"

Nov 7 2024
The Society Room of Hartford
Past

CERCLA Year in Review

10/21/2021
Robinson + Cole
Past

Lawyers for Children America "Champions for Children: Celebrating 30 Years of Protecting Children and Partnering for Change"

Nov 7 2024
The Society Room of Hartford
Past

CERCLA Year in Review

10/21/2021
Robinson + Cole
Past

Responding to Safety Complaints and Incidents – Case Studies

10/08/2020
Past

Lawyers Lending a Hand in Recovery

6/12/2020
CWCSEO Small Business Matters Series of videos
Past

Advances in Climate Change Litigation

Nov 20 2019
American Bar Association Roundtable
Past

Dredging and Environmental Issues

Feb 12 2019
2019 Port Administration and Legal Issues Seminar presented by the American Association of Port Authorities
Past

Responding to Safety Complaints and Incidents – Case Studies

10/08/2020
Past

Lawyers Lending a Hand in Recovery

6/12/2020
CWCSEO Small Business Matters Series of videos
Past

Advances in Climate Change Litigation

Nov 20 2019
American Bar Association Roundtable
Past

Dredging and Environmental Issues

Feb 12 2019
2019 Port Administration and Legal Issues Seminar presented by the American Association of Port Authorities

Environmental Law +


Below is an excerpt of Environmental Law + blog posts authored by Peter.

Federal Courts Unswayed by Administration Stop Work Orders

Echoing recent rulings from the District Court for the District of Columbia, on January 16, 2026, the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted Dominion Energy’s request for a preliminary injunction, lifting the Trump administration’s suspension of the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project. Earlier that same week, two other judges in same district... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Offshore Developers Wind Up Challenges To Latest Stop Work Orders

In response to the Trump administration’s latest suspension of offshore wind development, three of the five affected developers have filed lawsuits in federal court seeking to overturn the stop work orders: Dominion Energy on behalf of its Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project; Ørsted on behalf of its Revolution Wind project; and Equinor on behalf of... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Just When You Thought It Was Safe To Go Back Into The Water – Trump Administration Halts Offshore Wind Projects

On December 22, citing security concerns, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) announced that it was pausing leases for all offshore wind projects currently under construction. The stop-work order blocks further construction of Vineyard Wind 1, Revolution Wind, Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, Sunrise Wind, and Empire Wind 1. All five projects had obtained leases... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Court Knocks the Wind out of Trump Administration’s Offshore Ban

On December 8, 2025, a Massachusetts federal court ruled that the Trump administration’s ban on permit application review for offshore and onshore wind projects was illegal.  While the ruling will not necessarily result in the issuance of new permits, it lifts the moratorium on review and processing of applications. In May 2025, a coalition of 17... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Revolution Wind Blasts Back

Following the Trump administration’s abrupt cancelation of the Revolution Wind project at the end of August, Revolution Wind LLC, a joint venture between Ørsted and Skyborn Renewables, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking to prevent enforcement of the stop work order. Revolution Wind contends that the order was motivated... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Trump Administration Derails Revolution Wind as Court Fight over Federal Policy Wages On

On Friday, August 22, 2025, the Trump administration announced the cancellation of the Revolution Wind project located off the south coast of Rhode Island, east of Block Island. At the time of the stop work order, the project, based out of the State Pier in New London, Connecticut, was approximately 80% complete with foundations in place... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Project Opponents of Empire Wind Strike Back

As recently reported, on May 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Interior reversed the stop work order it issued on April 16, 2025, thereby allowing the $5 billion, 2 GW, Empire Wind project to proceed. On June 3, 2025, a coalition of Empire Wind opponents sued the Trump administration in federal court in New... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Amidst Offshore Wind Moratorium, Empire Wind Back on Track

On May 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Interior reversed its April 16 stop work order and allowed the $5 billion, 2 GW, Empire Wind project 12 miles south of Long Island to proceed. The move follows an intensive lobbying effort by the project’s developer, Equinor ASA, who coordinated with federal, state, and city... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

Coalition of States Dispute Trump Administration’s “National Energy Emergency” Claim

On the heels of an action by states challenging the Trump administration’s efforts to block federal permits for offshore wind development a lawsuit filed by 15 states on May 9, 2025, claims that the administration misapplied the National Emergencies Act in declaring a national energy emergency.  The emergency declaration, announced in a January 20, 2025,... Continue Reading

Visit Blog

States Sue Trump Administration Over Blocked Wind Developments

On Monday, May 4, 2025, a coalition of 17 states and the District of Columbia filed suit in Massachusetts District Court over the Trump administration’s efforts to block federal permits for all offshore wind development. The administration’s policy was announced in a January 20, 2025 executive order placing federal permitting of wind projects on hold... Continue Reading

Visit Blog